Moderators: spanky, SkiDork, shortski, Bubba
da Pimp wrote:Close to eleven percent? I find that real hard to believe. Based on my own observations of every weekend at Killington, I would have believed numbers around 20-25%. My ski club had poor attendance at our lodge every month, we turned back huge numbers of unused bulk tickets for all VT areas, and the slopes and liftlines seemed abnormally slow for the many crummy weekends before Xmas let alone the terrible March/April heat wave. People simply stayed away from the mountain, and the wicked slow access road activity for the last 6-7 weeks of the season was obvious. Areas south of Killington struggled just to get anything skiable before Xmas. Those southern VT early season numbers must have been miniscule.
I would love to see the actual attendances as reported to the VSAA by the mountain marketing snakes. I bet they pulled some BS out of their butts such as using average season pass holder attendance versus actuals recorded, or reservations made instead of the actuals which reflected a ton of cancellations.
I wish it was all true, but it seems so hard to believe. If a snowmaking giant (former snowmaking giant) like Killington seemed so slow, where do the other areas get their attendance numbers that contribute to the claimed 10.5%?
Highway Star wrote:da Pimp wrote:Close to eleven percent? I find that real hard to believe. Based on my own observations of every weekend at Killington, I would have believed numbers around 20-25%. My ski club had poor attendance at our lodge every month, we turned back huge numbers of unused bulk tickets for all VT areas, and the slopes and liftlines seemed abnormally slow for the many crummy weekends before Xmas let alone the terrible March/April heat wave. People simply stayed away from the mountain, and the wicked slow access road activity for the last 6-7 weeks of the season was obvious. Areas south of Killington struggled just to get anything skiable before Xmas. Those southern VT early season numbers must have been miniscule.
I would love to see the actual attendances as reported to the VSAA by the mountain marketing snakes. I bet they pulled some BS out of their butts such as using average season pass holder attendance versus actuals recorded, or reservations made instead of the actuals which reflected a ton of cancellations.
I wish it was all true, but it seems so hard to believe. If a snowmaking giant (former snowmaking giant) like Killington seemed so slow, where do the other areas get their attendance numbers that contribute to the claimed 10.5%?
Killington was down vs. other areas. Killington is no longer a snowmaking giant and people know it. Killington is also not counting all skier visits, I skied at least 10 days where my pass was not scanned. When a Killington passholder goes and buys a ticket at another area, that visit actually gets counted (by the other area). Killington either set a modern all time low for skier visits or matched '07-'08. I'm guessing around 550-600k.



da Pimp wrote:Close to eleven percent? I find that real hard to believe. Based on my own observations of every weekend at Killington, I would have believed numbers around 20-25%. My ski club had poor attendance at our lodge every month, we turned back huge numbers of unused bulk tickets for all VT areas
da Pimp wrote:Close to eleven percent? I find that real hard to believe. Based on my own observations of every weekend at Killington, I would have believed numbers around 20-25%. My ski club had poor attendance at our lodge every month, we turned back huge numbers of unused bulk tickets for all VT areas, and the slopes and liftlines seemed abnormally slow for the many crummy weekends before Xmas let alone the terrible March/April heat wave. People simply stayed away from the mountain, and the wicked slow access road activity for the last 6-7 weeks of the season was obvious. Areas south of Killington struggled just to get anything skiable before Xmas. Those southern VT early season numbers must have been miniscule.
I would love to see the actual attendances as reported to the VSAA by the mountain marketing snakes. I bet they pulled some BS out of their butts such as using average season pass holder attendance versus actuals recorded, or reservations made instead of the actuals which reflected a ton of cancellations.
I wish it was all true, but it seems so hard to believe. If a snowmaking giant (former snowmaking giant) like Killington seemed so slow, where do the other areas get their attendance numbers that contribute to the claimed 10.5%?
hillbangin wrote:
I wonder if places like K, Bush, Jay, Stowe do better because you've got a more 'dedicated' season pass crowd following - places like Okeblow, Stratton, and Snow must get killed in down snow years becuase it's more 'weekend warriors' - not that there's anything wrong with that.


hillbangin wrote:da Pimp wrote:Close to eleven percent? I find that real hard to believe. Based on my own observations of every weekend at Killington, I would have believed numbers around 20-25%. My ski club had poor attendance at our lodge every month, we turned back huge numbers of unused bulk tickets for all VT areas, and the slopes and liftlines seemed abnormally slow for the many crummy weekends before Xmas let alone the terrible March/April heat wave. People simply stayed away from the mountain, and the wicked slow access road activity for the last 6-7 weeks of the season was obvious. Areas south of Killington struggled just to get anything skiable before Xmas. Those southern VT early season numbers must have been miniscule.
I would love to see the actual attendances as reported to the VSAA by the mountain marketing snakes. I bet they pulled some BS out of their butts such as using average season pass holder attendance versus actuals recorded, or reservations made instead of the actuals which reflected a ton of cancellations.
I wish it was all true, but it seems so hard to believe. If a snowmaking giant (former snowmaking giant) like Killington seemed so slow, where do the other areas get their attendance numbers that contribute to the claimed 10.5%?
I wonder if places like K, Bush, Jay, Stowe do better because you've got a more 'dedicated' season pass crowd following - places like Okeblow, Stratton, and Snow must get killed in down snow years becuase it's more 'weekend warriors' - not that there's anything wrong with that.
Geoff wrote:Since Killington doesn't publish skier visits, all we can do is look at state data. The traffic counter on the Access Road gives you a good idea on how many people were around. Sales, meals, lodging, and alcohol give a sense for lift tickets, retail, and the overall tourist business in town.
Here are the results from the traffic counter on the Access Road:
November down 2%
December down 3.1%
January down 3.5%
February down 4.5%
March down 6.7%
April down 8.6%
The Vermont tax data is out through February:
November:
Sales, down 39.5%
Meals, up 20%
Room, down 7.4%
Alcohol, up 5.2%
December:
Sales, down 51.8%
Meals, down 2.9%
Room, down 13.2%
Alcohol, up 7%
January:
Sales, down 17%
Meals, down 8.5%
Room, down 17%
Alcohol, down 9.5%
February:
Sales, down 8.7%
Meals, down 9%
Room, down 18%
Alcohol, down 2%
Bad but still better than that first disaster POWDR year.
RENO wrote:I've asked this before and haven't gotten an answer: Where exactly is this traffic counter located on the access road? Does it take into account the traffic coming up East Mountain Road and West Hill Road?



Geoff wrote:RENO wrote:I've asked this before and haven't gotten an answer: Where exactly is this traffic counter located on the access road? Does it take into account the traffic coming up East Mountain Road and West Hill Road?
It's 0.4 miles up the hill. There are no traffic counters on West Hill Road or East Mountain Road. The total number really doesn't matter. What matters is the overall trend from year to year. You'd expect West Hill Road and East Mountain Road traffic to be fairly proportional to the main Access Road.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests