Check this out.
Pretty lame. If Kerry wants a recount, then he should get up and say so. Saying his camp supports Mike Bednarik, his 14K votes, and his request for a recount is juvenile.
Where have all the great leaders gone?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/ ... index.html
Ohio Recount
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8067
- Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 07:28
- Location: Between the Dark and the Daylight
- Contact:
Just making sure all of the double votes get counted fairly, don't want to disenfranchise anyone.
This is so funny, the one thing Americans can't stand is a sore looser. I hope they keep this crap up until 2008, they may not be able to field a candidate.
This is so funny, the one thing Americans can't stand is a sore looser. I hope they keep this crap up until 2008, they may not be able to field a candidate.
Cogito, ergo sum
Sometimes it is that simple.
Sometimes it is that simple.
In an election that was so closely contested, I don't see any problem with recounting. Making sure that everyone's vote counts in a cornerstone to democracy. Ensuring that everyone (who wants to) can participate in our government fairly and equally is the only way to see that our nation will continue to thrive as the "beacon of democracy" that many of us claim that it is -- regardless of political affiliation. Even if Bush comes out of the recount even more ahead of Kerry, I definately support the recount measures.
~ Patriot first, Democrat second.
~ Patriot first, Democrat second.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 09:10
- Location: Under the Boardwalk
- Contact:
Re: Ohio Recount
Nothing wrong with making sure everything's done as fairly and accurately asDoubleD wrote:Check this out.
Pretty lame. If Kerry wants a recount, then he should get up and say so. Saying his camp supports Mike Bednarik, his 14K votes, and his request for a recount is juvenile.
Where have all the great leaders gone?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/ ... index.html
possible. Kerry's on record as stating that there's no way the recount will change the result. The Greens and Libertarians are paying for the recount, as they are legally required to, so what's the problem??
What is not possible is not to choose. ~Jean-Paul Sartre
Re: Ohio Recount
Who won't be happy? The Greens? The Lbertarians? I don't get it. Those would be the third and fourth Parties?DMC wrote:You know what the problem is... Any chance these guys have to jump on Democrats - they take it... Even though this whole thing was started by the Green party and the Liberitarians...BigKahuna13 wrote:Nothing wrong with making sure everything's done as fairly and accurately asDoubleD wrote:Check this out.
Pretty lame. If Kerry wants a recount, then he should get up and say so. Saying his camp supports Mike Bednarik, his 14K votes, and his request for a recount is juvenile.
Where have all the great leaders gone?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/ ... index.html
possible. Kerry's on record as stating that there's no way the recount will change the result. The Greens and Libertarians are paying for the recount, as they are legally required to, so what's the problem??
They wont be happy until we have a one party system..
Better Dead(Grateful) then red!