Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Anything and Everything political, express your view, but play nice
Post Reply
f.a.s.t.
Wanted Poster
Posts: 3063
Joined: Nov 14th, '11, 09:43

Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by f.a.s.t. »

Here is a list of Sharia Law, the basis of the Islam Religion. There is no separation of Church and State, it is unconstitutional and needs to be banned in the USA.

• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on
!!!!!!!!!! MAKE AMERICA LOVE AGAIN !!!!!!!!!!
Coydog
Guru Poster
Posts: 5926
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 12:23

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by Coydog »

First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I say go for it - as long as you can repeal that persnickety First Amendment.
madhatter
Signature Poster
Posts: 18340
Joined: Apr 2nd, '08, 17:26

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by madhatter »

Coydog wrote:First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;not exactly carte blanche or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I say go for it - as long as you can repeal that persnickety First Amendment.
many of the above are illegal practices in the US whether in the name of religion or otherwise...
mach es sehr schnell

'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
Coydog
Guru Poster
Posts: 5926
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 12:23

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by Coydog »

madhatter wrote:
Coydog wrote:First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;not exactly carte blanche or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I say go for it - as long as you can repeal that persnickety First Amendment.
many of the above are illegal practices in the US whether in the name of religion or otherwise...
So the acts would be banned, not the religion - like polygamy and Romneyism, um, Mormonism.
f.a.s.t.
Wanted Poster
Posts: 3063
Joined: Nov 14th, '11, 09:43

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by f.a.s.t. »

Coydog wrote:First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I say go for it - as long as you can repeal that persnickety First Amendment.
Islam is the State, the State is Islam...........it is unconstitutional, there is no separation. Islam is the established religion by law and all other religions are banned.
!!!!!!!!!! MAKE AMERICA LOVE AGAIN !!!!!!!!!!
Coydog
Guru Poster
Posts: 5926
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 12:23

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by Coydog »

f.a.s.t. wrote:
Coydog wrote:First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I say go for it - as long as you can repeal that persnickety First Amendment.
Islam is the State, the State is Islam...........it is unconstitutional, there is no separation. Islam is the established religion by law and all other religions are banned.
The State is not Islam in the US, so what's the problem? If a person in the US practices a religious act that under the circumstances is illegal, they are breaking the law - just ask Kim Davis.

Do you want to ban Islam in countries that have an Islamic theocracy? Don't think even The Donald could manage that.
madhatter
Signature Poster
Posts: 18340
Joined: Apr 2nd, '08, 17:26

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by madhatter »

Coydog wrote:
madhatter wrote:
Coydog wrote:First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;not exactly carte blanche or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I say go for it - as long as you can repeal that persnickety First Amendment.
many of the above are illegal practices in the US whether in the name of religion or otherwise...
So the acts would be banned, not the religion - like polygamy and Romneyism, um, Mormonism.
the mormons stopped practicing polygamy in 1890...
mach es sehr schnell

'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
madhatter
Signature Poster
Posts: 18340
Joined: Apr 2nd, '08, 17:26

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by madhatter »

f.a.s.t. wrote:
Coydog wrote:First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I say go for it - as long as you can repeal that persnickety First Amendment.
Islam is the State, the State is Islam...........it is unconstitutional, there is no separation. Islam is the established religion by law and all other religions are banned.
not here...
mach es sehr schnell

'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
Coydog
Guru Poster
Posts: 5926
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 12:23

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by Coydog »

madhatter wrote:
Coydog wrote:
madhatter wrote:
Coydog wrote:First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;not exactly carte blanche or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I say go for it - as long as you can repeal that persnickety First Amendment.
many of the above are illegal practices in the US whether in the name of religion or otherwise...
So the acts would be banned, not the religion - like polygamy and Romneyism, um, Mormonism.
the mormons stopped practicing polygamy in 1890...
Yeah, after it was made illegal here and enforcement was upheld by the courts.
Dr. NO
Signature Poster
Posts: 21422
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 05:52
Location: In the Baah!

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by Dr. NO »

madhatter wrote:
Coydog wrote:
madhatter wrote:
Coydog wrote:First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;not exactly carte blanche or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I say go for it - as long as you can repeal that persnickety First Amendment.
many of the above are illegal practices in the US whether in the name of religion or otherwise...
So the acts would be banned, not the religion - like polygamy and Romneyism, um, Mormonism.
the mormons stopped practicing polygamy in 1890...
They SAY they stopped practicing polygamy when the laws forced them to. They didn't stop marrying multiple women, just not on paper. They usually live in compounds and raise and teach their own to avoid contact with the outside world as much as possible. The "moms" some stay at home and care for the family while those with jobs go about life as if nothing is different.
MUST STOP POSTING ! MUST STOP POSTING !

Shut up and Ski!

Why's Everybody Always Pickin on Me?
steamboat1
Post Office
Posts: 4540
Joined: Sep 12th, '11, 21:53
Location: Brooklyn, NY/Pittsford,VT

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by steamboat1 »

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2015-12-09.html

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ME!
December 9, 2015
For my best birthday gift this week, Donald Trump called for blocking Muslim immigration to the United States. If he throws in all immigration, it will be my merriest Christmas ever.


By contrast, the eunuchs running against Trump went mental.


Marco Rubio called Trump's proposed moratorium on Muslim immigration "offensive and outlandish."


Rubio's idea for stopping Muslim terrorist attacks on U.S. soil is something simple: Launch several wars to clean up the entire Middle East.


Chris Christie called Trump's plan "ridiculous," saying, "This is the kind of thing that people say when they have no experience and don't know what they're talking about."


People with "experience" say things like: Walls don't work and are "too expensive."


Ted Cruz said he disagreed with Trump and instead would focus on "radical Islamic terrorism." Cruz will have a lot more radicals to focus on if we keep importing a quarter million Muslims every year.


And these were Republicans. MSNBC acted as if the nation had come under terrorist attack (by a Muslim immigrant) with its round-the-clock, breaking-news coverage of Trump's proposal, rife with images of dangerous demagogues from George Wallace to Hitler.


People without real arguments call anything they don't like "racist" or "unconstitutional."


Trump's proposal is neither -- I won't waste space mentioning 100 years of constitutional law and practice, but of course our country has absolute authority to decide who gets to immigrate here.


In the 14 years since Muslims killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11, this country has admitted another 1.5 million Muslims. So we're xenophobic, bigoted racists if we don't make it 2 million? Three million? When will we have enough? How many murdered Americans is an acceptable number before we can shut off the spigot of Muslim immigration?



The amazing thing is that no one (except the American people) wants any pause in Muslim immigration -- even after more than a dozen Muslim terrorist attacks on our soil in the last 15 years.


House Speaker Paul Ryan announced that he will refuse to consider cuts to Muslim immigration, saying, "That's not who we are."


Republicans are totally copacetic with Pew's recent finding that white Christians are now a minority in America, but furious with Trump for suggesting we take a break from importing Muslims.


Can we move them to Ryan's district? According to Pew, only 11 percent of Muslims are Republican or "lean Republican." They may not make the "best Americans" -- as Ryan claims -- but at least they'd get rid of him.


The hysterical demand for never-ending Third World immigration has gone beyond the rich's need for cheap servants and the Democrats' need for voters. It's a mass psychosis.


Everyone acts as if Pakistani pushcart operators are the same as American blacks, and we're required to bring them here to make up for the legacy of slavery.


Foreigners aren't the descendants of American slaves! The rest of the world does not have a civil right to move here. We're under no moral imperative to allow any immigration at all. We don't owe citizens of other countries anything.


But as long as you brought it up: They owe us. America runs around saving other countries from tsunamis, earthquakes, pirates, disease, starvation, warlords, dictators, Nazis, communists -- then their citizens show up full of grievances, as if we owe them.


Angry Muslims have been popping up all over TV to denounce Trump and complain about anti-Muslim bigotry in the U.S. If they'd prefer a country with a larger Muslim population and no white devil oppressors, low-rent mud huts are available in any of about 50 Muslim countries around the world. First month free; after that, two goats a month.


In addition to the thoughtful policy objection that Trump is a racist, we've been treated to an endless stream of stunningly stupid arguments against Trump's proposal.


Fox News' Dana Perino complained that Trump's policy doesn't "distinguish the peaceful from the radicals."


Yeah, nor can our government.


Given the devastation caused by only two Muslims in San Bernardino, eight Muslims in Paris, two at the Boston Marathon, one at a Chattanooga military recruitment center, one at Fort Hood, 19 on 9/11, etc. etc. -- it's really irrelevant whether "most" Muslim immigrants are peaceful little lambs. It doesn't take a lot of them to create havoc.


I don't know why we need any.


While it's fantastic news that most Muslim immigrants aren't terrorists, as Samuel Johnson said, "A horse who can count to 10 is a remarkable horse, not a remarkable mathematician."


We want remarkable Americans, not immigrants whose selling point is: "hasn't blown anything up yet." What's the upside of admitting 250,000 poor, culturally backward, non-English-speaking Muslims every year? When are we allowed to talk about what's good for America?


San Bernardino shooter Syed Farouk's mother described his father -- the original immigrant -- this way: "My husband is mentally ill and is on medication but is also an alcoholic and drinks with the medicine."


Fantastic. So glad we got him. The father, who has been here since 1973 -- thanks, Teddy Kennedy! -- told an Italian newspaper that he preached moderation to his son, saying it's not worth fighting Israel, because Russia, China and the U.S. "don't want Jews there any more." In "two years," he assured his son, "Israel will not exist any more."


So after four decades in American culture, these highly integrated, model immigrants are still clinging to their insane magic potion fantasies.


The senior Farouk didn't come here to work in some highly complex technical field, like nuclear physics or cell extraction biology. He's a truck driver. So one American lost his job as a truck driver and 14 Americans lost their lives because of Ted Kennedy's 1965 immigration act.


How else have the 1.5 million Muslims admitted since 9/11 made our country better? Their massive welfare use? Overburdening our schools and hospitals? The machete attacks? The clitorectomies? The honor killings? The occasional terrorist attack?


Currently, there are more than a thousand active investigations of ISIS in all 50 states. Here's an idea: Instead of paying for an ever-expanding federal workforce to track, wiretap and investigate immigrants with possible terrorist sympathies, let's stop bringing them in!


Beginning to sense the public's fury, a number of Republican politicians have been trying to talk tough on immigration. This week, Trump proved that that's all it is: talk.
Dr. NO
Signature Poster
Posts: 21422
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 05:52
Location: In the Baah!

Re: Ban Islam in the USA, it is unconstitutional

Post by Dr. NO »

A little country ditty from the land down under.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/yZZlo0WZ_iU?rel=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
MUST STOP POSTING ! MUST STOP POSTING !

Shut up and Ski!

Why's Everybody Always Pickin on Me?
Post Reply