Japan debates strikes on N. Korea

[XtremeJibber2001]

Japan debates strikes on N. Korea
Discussions signal harder stance ahead of U.N. vote

Monday, July 10, 2006; Posted: 7:09 a.m. EDT (11:09 GMT)

TOKYO, Japan (AP) -- Japan said Monday it was considering whether a pre-emptive strike on the North's missile bases would violate its constitution, signaling a hardening stance ahead of a possible U.N. Security Council vote on Tokyo's proposal for sanctions against the regime.

While Japan talked of sanctions, China -- North Korea's top ally and benefactor -- pressed ahead with its diplomatic efforts to draw North Korea back to stalled six-nation talks on its nuclear weapons program, dispatching a high-profile delegation to Pyongyang on Monday.

U.S. nuclear envoy Christopher Hill huddled with Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Aso and other officials in Tokyo on a tour of the region to coordinate a common strategy on the North's missile tests last week and urge Pyongyang to drop its months-long boycott of the nuclear talks.

North Korea's missile tests last week caused no injuries or damage, but they sparked international condemnation. Officials in Japan -- badly shaken by the tests -- said Monday they were mulling whether their pacifist constitution allowed pre-emptive strikes on North Korean missile targets.

"If we accept that there is no other option to prevent an attack ... there is the view that attacking the launch base of the guided missiles is within the constitutional right of self-defense. We need to deepen discussion," said Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe.

Japan's U.S.-drafted constitution, untouched since it was enacted after World War II, foreswears the use of war to settle international disputes, but the government has interpreted that to allow defensive forces. The question is whether such a pre-emptive strike could be defined as self-defense.

The discussions Monday came ahead of a possible vote Monday in the U.N. Security Council on Japan's U.S.-backed resolution to prohibit nations from procuring missiles or missile-related "items, materials goods and technology" from North Korea.

While the U.S., Britain and France were behind the measure, the other two veto-wielding members of the council, China and Russia, favor a softer approach. Speculation was high that Russia would abstain if it came to a vote, but a Chinese veto was still considered a possibility.

U.S. officials were calling for China to take a bolder stand with the North and to use its influence with Pyongyang to persuade it to return to the six-party talks, which are hosted by Beijing. Hill said Washington was working with both China and Russia to force a common approach.

Still, he raised a rare question about how influential Beijing really was with the enigmatic regime.

"I must say the issue of China's influence on DPRK is one that concerns us," Hill told reporters. "China said to the DPRK, `Don't fire those missiles,' but the DPRK fired them. So I think everybody, especially the Chinese, are a little bit worried about it."

The DPKR refers to the North's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

Despite the opposition, Japan showed no signs of backing away from the U.N. resolution.

"It's important for the international community to express a strong will in response to the North Korean missile launches," Abe told reporters. "This resolution is an effective way of expressing that."

China was also active on the U.N. front.

Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing "exchanged views" by phone Sunday with his counterparts from 11 council members and South Korea, the Foreign Ministry said on its Web site. He "stressed that any action should be conducive to maintaining the peace and stability in the region and the unity of the Security Council," the two-sentence statement said without elaborating.

On Monday, Vice Foreign Minister Wu Dawei, China's chief nuclear negotiator, and Chinese Vice Premier Hui Liangyu arrived in Pyongyang for a six-day stay. The two governments exchanged congratulatory messages marking the 45th anniversary of a friendship treaty between the neighbors.

The Chinese government hasn't said whether Wu or Hui would bring up the six-nation nuclear talks. But a ministry spokeswoman said last week that China was "making assiduous efforts" in pushing for a resumption of the negotiations.

Talks have been deadlocked since November because of a boycott by Pyongyang in protest of a crackdown by Washington on the regime's alleged money-laundering and other financial crimes.

A North Korean delegation was expected in China on Tuesday to mark the treaty anniversary.

North Korea agreed in September 2005 to give up its nuclear ambitions in return for aid and energy, but no progress has been made to implement that accord.

As a way out of the impasse, China has suggested an informal gathering which could allow Pyongyang to technically stand by its boycott, but at the same time meet with the other five parties. Hill backed the proposal on Saturday, and said Washington could meet with the North on the sidelines of such a meeting.

Hill said he discussed the proposal with Japan's Aso, but he refused to provide any details.

Guess it would be nice for Japan to handle this on their own without us.

[ski_adk]

[St. Jerry]

That's a great response/picture!

[BigKahuna13]

Interesting to see what happens. JSDF had troops in Iraq until recently, but they weren't allowed to carry weapons and needed to be protected by
other coalition troops.

Considering that the country pretty much only uses nuclear power and knows how to enrich uranium, Japan could become a large nuclear power pretty quickly. If it ever came to it, North Korea would be toast.

[yeti]

They possess almost 100 tons of weapons grade plutonium.

However Japan is too smart to do something foolhardy like start another war - or so we all hope.

[BigKahuna13]

They possess almost 100 tons of weapons grade plutonium.

However Japan is too smart to do something foolhardy like start another war - or so we all hope.

Agreed. Last thing anyone needs is an arms race in Asia. But there is a fringe movement in the country that's advocating serious re-armament. In recent years they have been growing and gaining some mainstream credibility.

[ski_adk]

In recent years they have been growing and gaining some mainstream credibility.

Japan's cultural history indicates a very strong military tradition. They don't like to be subjugated under anyone's authority -- friend or foe. They are a very proud people. And likewise, history has shown them to be utterly ruthless when they go on the offensive. The entire Asian peninsula knows this and would not be too warm to the idea of another Japanese empire. Any singular act of aggression by the Japanese could easily be construed as the beginning of just such an endeavor.

[shortski]

Wow, three posts in a row well though out and sticking to the point...we can't have that...and I'm here to put things right...

The Us should just supply Japan with suit case nukes to take out Korea, then we can get all their oil. IMHO