You Just Can't Make This S--t Up...

[JerseyGuy]

This is truly despicable. In another world, in another time, this might simply be too hard to believe... but in today's Republican Congress and Bush White House, it's just more of the same old nonsensical crap:


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The military's top generals have warned Iraq is on the cusp of a civil war and that U.S. troops must remain in large numbers until at least next spring. But if the winds suddenly blow a different direction, Congress is ready to celebrate with a $20 million victory party.

Lawmakers included language in this year's defense spending bill, approved last week, allowing them to spend the money. The money for "commemoration of success" in Iraq and Afghanistan was originally tucked into last year's defense measure, but went unspent amid an uptick in violence in both countries that forced the Pentagon to extend tours of duty for thousands of troops.

Republicans have yet to claim responsibility for the provision. Democrats say it was likely added by the Senate's majority Republicans, and less than five weeks from congressional elections are pointing to it as another example of where the GOP has gone astray handling the war in Iraq.

"If the Bush administration is planning victory celebrations, Americans deserve to know what their plan is to get us to a victory in Iraq," said Rebecca Kirszner, spokeswoman for Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada.

Carolyn Weyforth, spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tennessee, said, "Republicans are confident we will be victorious in the ongoing war in terror, and we look forward to a time when those funds can be used to honor the men and women who have risked and given their lives."

Under the language, the president could "designate a day of celebration" to honor troops serving in the two wars. The president also could call on the nation "to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities" and issue awards to troops who have served honorably.

The Pentagon could spend up to $20 million of its $532 billion budget in 2007 for the commemoration, minus any private contributions it might receive for such an event.(Watch CNN special Rumsfeld's Challenge in Iraq -- 3:30)

The money will be available for the 2007 budget year, which began October 1.

Some 140,000 U.S. troops remain in Iraq, with a drawdown not expected until at least early next year.(Watch retired U.S. Army general criticize troop levels in Iraq -- 8:13)

About 20,000 more are in Afghanistan. Last year, Bush administration and Pentagon officials had hoped thousands of troops could be brought home before the November 7 elections.

Proclaiming victory in the Iraq war has already proven to be tricky business.

President Bush was slammed by critics for delivering his "Mission Accomplished" speech in May 2003 aboard an aircraft carrier. While troops had successfully stormed Iraq and toppled Saddam Hussein's regime in Baghdad, the fight over control in the nation against a violent insurgency had just begun.

Vice President Dick Cheney also was ridiculed for suggesting last year that the insurgency was in its "final throes."

[XtremeJibber2001]

This is f*** sh*t. But it rests on the Dem's shoulders as well since they helped pass the bill.

Both parties don't deserve my vote.

[JerseyGuy]

This is f*** sh*t. But it rests on the Dem's shoulders as well since they helped pass the bill.

No, it doesn't. It was yet another last-minute BS clause inserted by GOP leaders in a bill headed for passage. They've made an art of this kind of thing over the past twelve years.

And if the Dems had voted AGAINST the bill becuase of this addition, their "no" votes would be bashed over their heads by Republicans seeking to tar them all as sniveling cowardly cut-and-runners who hate America and don't support the troops.

Disgusting.

[XtremeJibber2001]

This is f*** sh*t. But it rests on the Dem's shoulders as well since they helped pass the bill.

No, it doesn't. It was yet another last-minute BS clause inserted by GOP leaders in a bill headed for passage. They've made an art of this kind of thing over the past twelve years.

And if the Dems had voted AGAINST the bill becuase of this addition, their "no" votes would be bashed over their heads by Republicans seeking to tar them all as sniveling cowardly cut-and-runners who hate America and don't support the troops.

Disgusting.

Dems help pass it, case closed. Putting clauses in at the last minute and putting it to vote is part of politics. It's been done many times by both parties. The whole congress is a f*** laugh