in a perfect world..

[Steve]

http://www.ronpaulexplore.com/

he would be president.

.. and he'll be the first republican candidate who'll I vote for in any election since 1996. it's the first time in a while that I'm excited about a presidential candidate.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul

[XtremeJibber2001]

http://www.ronpaulexplore.com/

he would be president.

.. and he'll be the first republican candidate who'll I vote for in any election since 1996. it's the first time in a while that I'm excited about a presidential candidate.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul

Looks like my kinda President. He looks like he needs a better website, maybe I'll volunteer to help ...

I wonder if he's pro-legalization of marijuana? After all, he does support medical usage.

[BigKahuna13]

Good stuff. Sucks that the man has to hide his Libertarianism under the blanket of the Republican Party.

[XtremeJibber2001]

Good stuff. Sucks that the man has to hide his Libertarianism under the blanket of the Republican Party.

Why don't the few Libertarians in congress form their own party?

[BigKahuna13]

Good stuff. Sucks that the man has to hide his Libertarianism under the blanket of the Republican Party.

Why don't the few Libertarians in congress form their own party?

There already is one. The fact that you don't know about it illustrates the problem that they and most 3rd parties have.

btw - there are something like a hundred - maybe more - political parties in this country. Bet most people can't name more than the big 2.

[XtremeJibber2001]

Good stuff. Sucks that the man has to hide his Libertarianism under the blanket of the Republican Party.

Why don't the few Libertarians in congress form their own party?

There already is one. The fact that you don't know about it illustrates the problem that they and most 3rd parties have.

btw - there are something like a hundred - maybe more - political parties in this country. Bet most people can't name more than the big 2.

Well ... I knew there were many more parties, but I think it would help if they represented themselves as Libertarians in congress rather than Republicans/Democrats. However, I guess if they did that, they might get some slack and lack the funding they would get if they were part of one of the two major parties.

[Dr. NO]

Good stuff. Sucks that the man has to hide his Libertarianism under the blanket of the Republican Party.

Why don't the few Libertarians in congress form their own party?

There already is one. The fact that you don't know about it illustrates the problem that they and most 3rd parties have.

btw - there are something like a hundred - maybe more - political parties in this country. Bet most people can't name more than the big 2.

Hmm, Communist, Libertarian, Green. that is the end of my list.

[XtremeJibber2001]

Good stuff. Sucks that the man has to hide his Libertarianism under the blanket of the Republican Party.

Why don't the few Libertarians in congress form their own party?

There already is one. The fact that you don't know about it illustrates the problem that they and most 3rd parties have.

btw - there are something like a hundred - maybe more - political parties in this country. Bet most people can't name more than the big 2.

Hmm, Communist, Libertarian, Green. that is the end of my list.

Socialist, but that falls under Democrat, oops.

[Dr. NO]

Good stuff. Sucks that the man has to hide his Libertarianism under the blanket of the Republican Party.

Why don't the few Libertarians in congress form their own party?

There already is one. The fact that you don't know about it illustrates the problem that they and most 3rd parties have.

btw - there are something like a hundred - maybe more - political parties in this country. Bet most people can't name more than the big 2.

Hmm, Communist, Libertarian, Green. that is the end of my list.

Socialist, but that falls under Democrat, oops.

No, there probably is a "sociolist Party" in the US. Just seems most dems want to be sociolist without the label.

[JerseyGuy]

Why don't the few Libertarians in congress form their own party?

There already is one. The fact that you don't know about it illustrates the problem that they and most 3rd parties have.

btw - there are something like a hundred - maybe more - political parties in this country. Bet most people can't name more than the big 2.

Hmm, Communist, Libertarian, Green. that is the end of my list.

Socialist, but that falls under Democrat, oops.

No, there probably is a "sociolist Party" in the US. Just seems most dems want to be sociolist without the label.

SociAlist! SociAlist! Are you mentally incapable of spelling that word correctly? Lord knows you fling it around often enough -- one would think you'd know how to spell it by now.

Christ, didn't you ever pass the third grade?

Better yet, just start calling them the "SOCS" to go with your constant rants about the "DEMS" and the "LIBS".

Dumbass...

[Dr. NO]

Before you harrass me about spelling some words I do NOT pass around much, Check out the grammar of others. I would rather see a word phoneticaly spelt wrong than the use of words and phrases improperly. You get pissed about Sociolist (socialist) by me, but what about Than vs. Then or There vs. Their? Don't hear (here is another one and almost got me) you high and mighty English Professors bitchin about that. Just shut the F up and ignore my spelling until the rest of the board can also comply.

[Cityskier]

Nice! The "I'm not the only retard" defense!

Well played, Doc. Well played!