Are laws inconsequential prejudice parameters? Again, against the law for a 17 year old to open carry. Should have been carded by the police and had his firearm confiscated and been arrested. Breaking curfew against the law. Should have been asked to leave just like the protesters, not thrown water bottles and told how much he is appreciated.Mister Moose wrote: ↑Aug 29th, '20, 16:08 Defaming him because of his weight, age, open carrying, or other inconsequential prejudical parameters is just.... just.... just so DHS.
ProjectionMister Moose wrote: ↑Aug 29th, '20, 16:08 DHS, you need to reconsider the rights of property owners to defend their property (and in other cases their homes).
Never have I have ever argued against the rights of homeowners to protect their private property with arms. If you don't feel that your own preparations with the support of law enforcement is enough, then hire a professional security firm to assist.
But having a bunch of wannabe GI Joes show up and patrol the streets with long riffles, threatening to shoot others over vandalism? Hard pass. Sounds like Fallujah to me, but plenty of Y'all Qaeda types want that.
If the local PD isn't enough to manage Civic unrest, call in the county police, then state and then National Guard. Having the local chapter of Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys patrolling? No freaking way. Heaven forbid my town ever has a rioting problem, I don't want private citizens from out of town showing up and shooting looters.
In these arguments I've seen those against magazine capacity limits state that limiting capacity doesn't matter as a skilled owner can swap magazines in two seconds. Now it does?Mister Moose wrote: ↑Aug 29th, '20, 16:08 Also, for the Barney Fife one bullet or limited size magazine proponents, Rittenhouse had to defend himself 3 times in a short time span. Leaving aside what the evidence shows in court on how justified the shooting was, this shows how in the real world limiting ammunition to a 1 digit number is not an educated position.
Which is it?
As you appear to making the claim that you are more educated than most on this subject, what should the law be?