Page 8 of 582

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 09:31
by XtremeJibber2001
boston_e wrote:
madhatter wrote:
freeski wrote:He needs to release his taxes.
no he does not...
Legally he does not have to, but considering he said he would once the mystery audit was complete, he should.

By not releasing them, it is reasonable to assume he has something to hide. What is he hiding?
Kinda of like Obama closing Guantanamo Bay? Like Obama saying you can keep your doctor? Lots of President's promise things that don't happen.

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 09:31
by madhatter
THIS WEEKEND'S RALLY

Image

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 09:58
by boston_e
XtremeJibber2001 wrote:
boston_e wrote:
madhatter wrote:
freeski wrote:He needs to release his taxes.
no he does not...
Legally he does not have to, but considering he said he would once the mystery audit was complete, he should.

By not releasing them, it is reasonable to assume he has something to hide. What is he hiding?
Kinda of like Obama closing Guantanamo Bay? Like Obama saying you can keep your doctor? Lots of President's promise things that don't happen.
So because past presidents didn't / were not able to follow through on things they said, that makes it right?

Not to mention, releasing his taxes is 100% in his control, unlike a lot of things other presidents have promised. He does not need to go through congress, courts, procedures etc to release his taxes. He could easily do it on his own. He must be hiding something, what is it?

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 10:02
by madhatter
boston_e wrote:
XtremeJibber2001 wrote:
boston_e wrote:
madhatter wrote:
freeski wrote:He needs to release his taxes.
no he does not...
Legally he does not have to, but considering he said he would once the mystery audit was complete, he should.

By not releasing them, it is reasonable to assume he has something to hide. What is he hiding?
Kinda of like Obama closing Guantanamo Bay? Like Obama saying you can keep your doctor? Lots of President's promise things that don't happen.
So because past presidents didn't / were not able to follow through on things they said, that makes it right?

Not to mention, releasing his taxes is 100% in his control, unlike a lot of things other presidents have promised. He does not need to go through congress, courts, procedures etc to release his taxes. He could easily do it on his own. He must be hiding something, what is it?
do you show people yours? you must be hiding something or you'd post them up here right? :?c


he has zero to gain by releasing them...libs will whine and cry no matter what, why bother trying to appease them? or even acknowledging their petty complaints?

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 10:46
by boston_e
madhatter wrote:do you show people yours? you must be hiding something or you'd post them up here right? :?c

This is a ridiculous comparison. I didn't run for public office where the longtime standard for Republicans and Democrats alike is to release them.

he has zero to gain by releasing them ...libs will whine and cry no matter what, why bother trying to appease them? or even acknowledging their petty complaints? Hmm, how about to help show that he has no conflict of interest? Or to follow through on an easily fulfill-able promise? Or if not to appease the liberals, how about appeasing the moderates, independents or skeptical republicans?

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 11:03
by deadheadskier
madhatter wrote:

he has zero to gain by releasing them...
God you are dense.

This isn't about him. It's about the American people gaining trust that there are no conflicts of interest. And actually, there is something for him to gain. The trust of those in the general public and Congress who are skeptical he may be hiding something detrimental to American interests.

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 11:05
by deadheadskier
...and you know, building trust is going to be one of the most important things he has to do to be able to accomplish his goals. It's called credibility because well you know......

this....

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 11:17
by madhatter
he won the election so apparently enough people to elect him aren't concerned...If you are concerned fine, but I'm not concerned about your concern...it's simply irrelevant...class dismissed...

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 11:19
by madhatter
deadheadskier wrote:
madhatter wrote:

he has zero to gain by releasing them...
God you are dense.

This isn't about him. It's about the American people gaining trust that there are no conflicts of interest. And actually, there is something for him to gain. The trust of those in the general public and Congress who are skeptical he may be hiding something detrimental to American interests.
the general public isn't concerned, it's just you moonbats...

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 11:32
by Nikoli
madhatter wrote:
deadheadskier wrote:
madhatter wrote:

he has zero to gain by releasing them...
God you are dense.

This isn't about him. It's about the American people gaining trust that there are no conflicts of interest. And actually, there is something for him to gain. The trust of those in the general public and Congress who are skeptical he may be hiding something detrimental to American interests.
the general public isn't concerned, it's just you moonbats...
What goes around comes around. Enjoy it.

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 11:37
by brownman
Just arriving back from Canada after a couple Primo Powder weeks. :like
Didn't observe any signs of Restored Greatness on the way through Customs.
Weren't we assured things would happen so quickly our heads would spin ?

Crowd Scientists debating Mall attendance .. that's what we need :shock:
Appears .. someone finally informed him the campaign is over with. :lol:
TPP is one in the plus column.
Long Road Ahead.

:Toast

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 11:41
by boston_e
madhatter wrote:he won the election so apparently enough people to elect him aren't concerned...If you are concerned fine, but I'm not concerned about your concern...it's simply irrelevant...class dismissed...
I don't think it is accurate to say that because someone voted for Dumb-ph that they would still not like for him to release his tax returns. Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

Don't forget he ran against the other co-worst candidate in history, so a lot of people who voted were holding their nose when they did.

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 11:47
by madhatter
Nikoli wrote:
madhatter wrote:
deadheadskier wrote:
madhatter wrote:

he has zero to gain by releasing them...
God you are dense.

This isn't about him. It's about the American people gaining trust that there are no conflicts of interest. And actually, there is something for him to gain. The trust of those in the general public and Congress who are skeptical he may be hiding something detrimental to American interests.
the general public isn't concerned, it's just you moonbats...
What goes around comes around. Enjoy it.
yep,payback for the last 8 years...definitely enjoying the loss of over 1000 D seats nationally since the '10 midterms...ya see this is the problem many of us were warning of...when you consolidate power first at the national level, then further by going around congress w executive actions in order to marginalize your opposition, you also set the stage for that power to be transferred to your opposition to be used against you...

what you fail to understand is that despite the incessant moonbat lunatic howlings, trump is taking action that IS winning...Yesterday;s union deal was a prime example of winning over former D's...when his policies take effect fewer and fewer will identify with the leftwing politics of gender and race in favor of the policy based actions of trump that favor anyone who wishes to take advantage of them regardless of gender or race...

not much gonna change in 2018 either...there won't be any tea party revolution that's for sure...just the same half a dozen whiney population centers within the blue states vs the rest of the country...2020 won't look much better if trump has even the mildest of economic success...2022 is too far to look ahead to...

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 11:53
by madhatter
boston_e wrote:
madhatter wrote:he won the election so apparently enough people to elect him aren't concerned...If you are concerned fine, but I'm not concerned about your concern...it's simply irrelevant...class dismissed...
I don't think it is accurate to say that because someone voted for Dumb-ph that they would still not like for him to release his tax returns. Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

Don't forget he ran against the other co-worst candidate in history, so a lot of people who voted were holding their nose when they did.
you keep telling yourself that...all I saw was chicks dressed as genitals this past weekend, nothing about taxes...again only the sore loser media and worshipers of the letter D are concerned about this...Like most conservatives I simply do not care at all what others make, nor do I care what they pay in taxes as that;s not my concern...if the IRS is satisfied, I'm satisfied too...what the left wants is to pick apart every LEGAL deduction, shelter etc and exploit that to rile up the ( barely) useful idiots...

meanwhile rangel and sharpton are known tax delinquents who no one on the left ever seems to even mention....

Re: Trump Presidency

Posted: Jan 24th, '17, 12:12
by deadheadskier
madhatter wrote:
deadheadskier wrote:
madhatter wrote:

he has zero to gain by releasing them...
God you are dense.

This isn't about him. It's about the American people gaining trust that there are no conflicts of interest. And actually, there is something for him to gain. The trust of those in the general public and Congress who are skeptical he may be hiding something detrimental to American interests.
the general public isn't concerned, it's just you moonbats...
Hmmm, I along with a majority of Americans would like to see the tax returns of the incoming President as has been customary for the past half century.

I'd like to see that he isn't violating the emolument clause in the Constitution. You know, kind of like the Republicans wanted to be certain of with Carter's peanut farm.

If I'm a moonbat, what does that make you?

There's a 30 page Obama thread with your verbal diarrhea all over it, never mind countless other threads. You've got such a loser life you basically haven't been able to go a day the past 8 years without coming to Kzone and broadcasting your rage.

And you took it to extreme levels. Calling for the death of Obama, which other forum members said was over the line and you should delete it. (lucky the secret service wasn't watching that day ya freak) You've also said you wanted to see Clinton swing from a rope.

You are on a whole other level. Most White Nationalist fascist pricks are.