$84 Million ?

[f.a.s.t.]

So Brownie let me ask you this ? Have the Pats EVER, even before Brady , have they ever beaten the NY GIANTS in a meaningful game ? I recall the year the Pats threw the bomb to Moss in reg. season to stay undefeated only to have the Giants beat them when it counted the most in the Super Bowl that year ! So 2 Super Bowl victories for ELI over Brady and the Pats says it all . Don't be a hater , instead cheer for the Giants to make it to the Super Bowl again to give your Pats another chance for a win .

You keep saying 2 SB wins over Brady.

If you watched the games, you'd know that in both games that TB left with the lead and the defense blew it in the 1st game and a fluky catch beat them in the 2nd.

So while the Pats lost both, you can hardly blame TB and last time I looked both teams have 4 SB wins.

But don't worry, I'm sure troll #2 will be around to prop up your thinking with something both pithy and witty, in his mind of course.

Terry Bradshaw, 4-0 in the Superbowl-UNDEAFETED-PERFECT RECORD (unlike Brady), once said to win the Superbowl the quarterback has to out play the opposing quarterback. If the other quarterback scores 4 touchdowns, then you have score 5 touchdowns. Brady did not score as many points as Manning, Manning out played him................PERIOD.

[SnoBrdr]

So Brownie let me ask you this ? Have the Pats EVER, even before Brady , have they ever beaten the NY GIANTS in a meaningful game ? I recall the year the Pats threw the bomb to Moss in reg. season to stay undefeated only to have the Giants beat them when it counted the most in the Super Bowl that year ! So 2 Super Bowl victories for ELI over Brady and the Pats says it all . Don't be a hater , instead cheer for the Giants to make it to the Super Bowl again to give your Pats another chance for a win .

You keep saying 2 SB wins over Brady.

If you watched the games, you'd know that in both games that TB left with the lead and the defense blew it in the 1st game and a fluky catch beat them in the 2nd.

So while the Pats lost both, you can hardly blame TB and last time I looked both teams have 4 SB wins.

But don't worry, I'm sure troll #2 will be around to prop up your thinking with something both pithy and witty, in his mind of course.

Terry Bradshaw, 4-0 in the Superbowl-UNDEAFETED-PERFECT RECORD (unlike Brady), once said to win the Superbowl the quarterback has to out play the opposing quarterback. If the other quarterback scores 4 touchdowns, then you have score 5 touchdowns. Brady did not score as many points as Manning, Manning out played him................PERIOD.

He also admitted to using steroids.

But he's your binky so I guess that's OK

[f.a.s.t.]

So Brownie let me ask you this ? Have the Pats EVER, even before Brady , have they ever beaten the NY GIANTS in a meaningful game ? I recall the year the Pats threw the bomb to Moss in reg. season to stay undefeated only to have the Giants beat them when it counted the most in the Super Bowl that year ! So 2 Super Bowl victories for ELI over Brady and the Pats says it all . Don't be a hater , instead cheer for the Giants to make it to the Super Bowl again to give your Pats another chance for a win .

You keep saying 2 SB wins over Brady.

If you watched the games, you'd know that in both games that TB left with the lead and the defense blew it in the 1st game and a fluky catch beat them in the 2nd.

So while the Pats lost both, you can hardly blame TB and last time I looked both teams have 4 SB wins.

But don't worry, I'm sure troll #2 will be around to prop up your thinking with something both pithy and witty, in his mind of course.

Terry Bradshaw, 4-0 in the Superbowl-UNDEAFETED-PERFECT RECORD (unlike Brady), once said to win the Superbowl the quarterback has to out play the opposing quarterback. If the other quarterback scores 4 touchdowns, then you have score 5 touchdowns. Brady did not score as many points as Manning, Manning out played him................PERIOD.

He also admitted to using steroids.

But he's your binky so I guess that's OK

In your face SloBOREdr........................Art Rooney with the four Lombardi trophies Bradshaw won----------------UNDEFEATED-PERFECT RECORD.
He was not outplayed by the other Quarterbacks.

[f.a.s.t.]

Just typical Boston Yahoo radical communist piggy. Ever notice how SloBOREdr is the first to accuse someone of stating facts from the past as not being relevant or current? Yet he is the first to bring up things that from the past when he thinks it benefits him. Yahoo-hypocrite-Boston-SloBOREdr.

[SnoBrdr]

Just typical Boston Yahoo radical communist piggy. Ever notice how SloBOREdr is the first to accuse someone of stating facts from the past as not being relevant or current? Yet he is the first to bring up things that from the past when he thinks it benefits him. Yahoo-hypocrite-Boston-SloBOREdr.

Uhm, those 6 SB trophies are neither current or relevant.

Chose your OWN words carefully.

BTW, your feeble attempt at word play on my name is just sad and embarrassing on your part.

Please, please try and do better.

It's kinda like me fighting a unarmed man.

Maybe the other trolls and wannabes will be along to help bail you out.

[brownman]

Bradshaw was indeed good, and had an excellent supporting cast.
He was blessed to be playing on a team that had a stretch as one of the best defenses in league history

Manning's team should have spent that money on defense.
They are hideous. Soon you will see just how bad it is.

There are 3 names that consistently surface in discussions of all time best QB.
Don't ever recall Terry or Eli in any of those discussions.

Have a nice day !

[f.a.s.t.]

You're missing the point. Bradshaw was undefeated in the Superbowl. Brady has lost twice, plus he and his team cheated too.

In addition, the NFL had to make two rule changes because of the controversial plays the Patriots have gotten away with to get to the Superbowl.

It's not about who the best quarterback is, it's about how many Superbowls you win. It's the one and only reason the game is played.

[madhatter]

You're missing the point. Bradshaw was undefeated in the Superbowl. Brady has lost twice, plus he and his team cheated too.

In addition, the NFL had to make two rule changes because of the controversial plays the Patriots have gotten away with to get to the Superbowl.

It's not about who the best quarterback is, it's about how many Superbowls you win. It's the one and only reason the game is played.

so brady and bradshaw have the same record then...

the rest is a bunch of cryin' ( like a bitch)

[f.a.s.t.]

You're missing the point. Bradshaw was undefeated in the Superbowl. Brady has lost twice, plus he and his team cheated too.

In addition, the NFL had to make two rule changes because of the controversial plays the Patriots have gotten away with to get to the Superbowl.

It's not about who the best quarterback is, it's about how many Superbowls you win. It's the one and only reason the game is played.

so brady and bradshaw have the same record then...

the rest is a bunch of cryin' ( like a bitch)

Better check the loss column there madhatter....................btw.............Patriots have the most Superbowl losses too, let's not forget that either.

[junior]

Just typical Boston Yahoo radical communist piggy. Ever notice how SloBOREdr is the first to accuse someone of stating facts from the past as not being relevant or current? Yet he is the first to bring up things that from the past when he thinks it benefits him. Yahoo-hypocrite-Boston-SloBOREdr.

It's kinda like me fighting a unarmed man.

Any you still wonder why you were fired dishonorably from the police force?

This little piggy went to market...........

[brownman]

Throwing pebbles from a glass shack
Here's a 'rule stretch' for you to chew on.

The article's 2nd to the last sentence is particularly telling.
Watch the replay ... there's a puck-stealer in that group

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nf ... y/1778279/

[madhatter]

You're missing the point. Bradshaw was undefeated in the Superbowl. Brady has lost twice, plus he and his team cheated too.

In addition, the NFL had to make two rule changes because of the controversial plays the Patriots have gotten away with to get to the Superbowl.

It's not about who the best quarterback is, it's about how many Superbowls you win. It's the one and only reason the game is played.

so brady and bradshaw have the same record then...

the rest is a bunch of cryin' ( like a bitch)

Better check the loss column there madhatter....................btw.............Patriots have the most Superbowl losses too, let's not forget that either.

but you CLEARLY said its about how many you WIN, unfortunately for bradshaw he had fewer opportunities to win cuz he wasn't good enough to make it that far that many times...

in reality year over year performance is what defines the greats...as you can see bradshaw doesn't even make the top ten...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m ... uarterback" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[madhatter]

and taken into the postseason:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_start ... ff_records" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

and the superbowl

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_q ... owl_starts" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


get yer cryin' towel out S.L.O.W.

[f.a.s.t.]

You're missing the point. Bradshaw was undefeated in the Superbowl. Brady has lost twice, plus he and his team cheated too.

In addition, the NFL had to make two rule changes because of the controversial plays the Patriots have gotten away with to get to the Superbowl.

It's not about who the best quarterback is, it's about how many Superbowls you win. It's the one and only reason the game is played.

so brady and bradshaw have the same record then...

the rest is a bunch of cryin' ( like a bitch)

Better check the loss column there madhatter....................btw.............Patriots have the most Superbowl losses too, let's not forget that either.

but you CLEARLY said its about how many you WIN, unfortunately for bradshaw he had fewer opportunities to win cuz he wasn't good enough to make it that far that many times...

in reality year over year performance is what defines the greats...as you can see bradshaw doesn't even make the top ten...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m ... uarterback" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Steelers had to play much tougher opponents than the Patriots do playing in the NCAA AFC East division. This pathetic division is an unfair competitive advantage for the Patriots which allows them a much easier path to the playoffs every year. If the Steelers were going up against the Jets-Dolphins-Bills twice a year for the past 20 years they would have had a couple more Superbowls, at least.

[SnoBrdr]

You're missing the point. Bradshaw was undefeated in the Superbowl. Brady has lost twice, plus he and his team cheated too.

In addition, the NFL had to make two rule changes because of the controversial plays the Patriots have gotten away with to get to the Superbowl.

It's not about who the best quarterback is, it's about how many Superbowls you win. It's the one and only reason the game is played.

so brady and bradshaw have the same record then...

the rest is a bunch of cryin' ( like a bitch)

Better check the loss column there madhatter....................btw.............Patriots have the most Superbowl losses too, let's not forget that either.

but you CLEARLY said its about how many you WIN, unfortunately for bradshaw he had fewer opportunities to win cuz he wasn't good enough to make it that far that many times...

in reality year over year performance is what defines the greats...as you can see bradshaw doesn't even make the top ten...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m ... uarterback" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Steelers had to play much tougher opponents than the Patriots do playing in the NCAA AFC East division. This pathetic division is an unfair competitive advantage for the Patriots which allows them a much easier path to the playoffs every year. If the Steelers were going up against the Jets-Dolphins-Bills twice a year for the past 20 years they would have had a couple more Superbowls, at least.

AS S.L.O.W fails to acknowledge and the same goes for fans of the 60s Celtics and the 50-60s Yankees is that all or most of these championships occurred BEFORE the advent of the biggest game changer in all of sports.

Free Agency.

All three of these teams were able to basically keep their entire teams intact and really didn't have to worry from year to year who was not going to be there.

Much, much easier to repeat or win multiples when you don't have to worry about that.

That's why you can't compare different eras and continue to live in the past.

It's all about who won the last one.