thorski wrote:JG-Wait -- are you claiming that Saddam was an ally of Iran? Are you really that ignorant?
I was saying it would only be a matter of time until they got together and started to work against us. The fact that you can't see this shows me how naive you are. That you try to put words in my mouth and make it look like i think they have been allies is silly. The threat was there that they would have become allies against a common western enemy.
Amazing. Now you're pretending that you can read minds and see into the future; justifying the invasion of Iraq by claiming that Iraq and their mortal enemies in Iran -- the nation they fought a bloody nine-year-war against, with America's support --
would have miraculously made nice and formed a League of Doom against the Western world.
You have nothing to base this on but your own ill-informed conjecture; no proof, no facts, no research, nothing but a pulled-out-of-your-ass guess. And you claim
I'M naive? What a joke!
thorski wrote:I think you all need to listen to how Obama talks about Iran. He will not allow them to develop a nuclear weapons.
Boy i wonder how everyone will feel if he is the one to invade Iran.
One doesn't necessarily mean the other. The Bush Doctrine isn't the only foreign policy process available to a new Commander-in-Chief, thank God.
thorski wrote:As far as my spelling goes. my home laptops keyboard doesn't work all that well.
If pointing out typos and misspells is your thing. Then you da'man.
Not sure what you're whining about here... even if you were capable of spelling at an eighth-grade level, your posts would STILL be mostly confused, ill-informed blather.