Page 1 of 1
Ohio Recount
Posted: Dec 8th, '04, 12:12
by DoubleD
Check this out.
Pretty lame. If Kerry wants a recount, then he should get up and say so. Saying his camp supports Mike Bednarik, his 14K votes, and his request for a recount is juvenile.
Where have all the great leaders gone?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/ ... index.html
Posted: Dec 8th, '04, 12:15
by CAPBOY
Don't know.
Posted: Dec 8th, '04, 12:18
by shortski
Just making sure all of the double votes get counted fairly, don't want to disenfranchise anyone.
This is so funny, the one thing Americans can't stand is a sore looser. I hope they keep this crap up until 2008, they may not be able to field a candidate.
Posted: Dec 9th, '04, 13:37
by ski_adk
In an election that was so closely contested, I don't see any problem with recounting. Making sure that everyone's vote counts in a cornerstone to democracy. Ensuring that everyone (who wants to) can participate in our government fairly and equally is the only way to see that our nation will continue to thrive as the "beacon of democracy" that many of us claim that it is -- regardless of political affiliation. Even if Bush comes out of the recount even more ahead of Kerry, I definately support the recount measures.
~ Patriot first, Democrat second.
Re: Ohio Recount
Posted: Dec 9th, '04, 13:50
by BigKahuna13
DoubleD wrote:Check this out.
Pretty lame. If Kerry wants a recount, then he should get up and say so. Saying his camp supports Mike Bednarik, his 14K votes, and his request for a recount is juvenile.
Where have all the great leaders gone?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/ ... index.html
Nothing wrong with making sure everything's done as fairly and accurately as
possible. Kerry's on record as stating that there's no way the recount will change the result. The Greens and Libertarians are paying for the recount, as they are legally required to, so what's the problem??
Re: Ohio Recount
Posted: Dec 9th, '04, 14:30
by DMC
...
Re: Ohio Recount
Posted: Dec 10th, '04, 11:30
by CAPBOY
DMC wrote:BigKahuna13 wrote:DoubleD wrote:Check this out.
Pretty lame. If Kerry wants a recount, then he should get up and say so. Saying his camp supports Mike Bednarik, his 14K votes, and his request for a recount is juvenile.
Where have all the great leaders gone?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/ ... index.html
Nothing wrong with making sure everything's done as fairly and accurately as
possible. Kerry's on record as stating that there's no way the recount will change the result. The Greens and Libertarians are paying for the recount, as they are legally required to, so what's the problem??
You know what the problem is... Any chance these guys have to jump on Democrats - they take it... Even though this whole thing was started by the Green party and the Liberitarians...
They wont be happy until we have a one party system..
Better Dead(Grateful) then red!
Who won't be happy? The Greens? The Lbertarians? I don't get it. Those would be the third and fourth Parties?