Steve wrote:Maybe your awesome superiority eludes my feeble mind, but it seems to me that you are contradicting yourself. Perhaps it's just a language barrier. You seem have a different definition of "Didn't bother" than I.
Don't play the victim. You have a curious proclivity for jumping at that hook, even when it is justified.
Fine. No need to hide behind a skirt.
Still trying not to stand on your own two feet.
Let's stop right here and pause a moment. This is what I find repugnant in you.
You were given the chance after trying to duck behind the opinion of another, but still you persist in hiding behind others to protect yourself from the weakness of your own words. Stand up and be a man, godammit.
You disgust me.
Ok, I vented, let's move on, shall we?
Great. Since (you and bubba) both agree that your first statement is true,
Wrong. We will be at this a while if you don't pay me the minimal respect of at least getting the last post directed at you factually correct. I said that Bubba's statement was true, in my estimation. Bubba made no such assertion as to agreeing with me. Once again, I want to tell you in no uncertain terms what a f*cking worm you are for not standing up and defending what you yourself believe in, but rather find it necessary to rely on others to defend what you profess to believe in. Do we have that clear? I hope we do. What Bubba said was that it's never happened before. What you said was that not only has it not happened before, but it "hasn't been necessary to the investigations.. or they didn't bother. "
then lets look at why would they never have raided a congressman's office?
1. It wasn't necessary. Easy enough.
2.
That's it? you move on to 2? Easy enough, how? Explain to me why it wasn't EVER necessary,
and more importantly, why the agency involved never ever could have felt that it was not necessary.
It was necessary, but they didn't do it because of some external reason. In other words, they didn't bother (and probably didn't complete the investigation.)
More sh*t. What specific external reasons are you referring to? Be very specific please.
You are wasting my time.