Stem Cell Research

yeti · Post by **yeti** » Jul 20th, '06, 07:31

Quite frankly it reminds me of stories about how back in the day the church forbade the dissecting cadavers to further knowledge of anatomy.

I don't understand how anyone - regardless of political orientation or party affiliation - cannot see just how much of an idiot Bush is.

XtremeJibber2001 · Post by **XtremeJibber2001** » Jul 20th, '06, 07:36

yeti wrote:I don't understand how anyone - regardless of political orientation or party affiliation - cannot see just how much of an idiot Bush is.

Most politians are IMHO.

For the record, I don't agree with the veto.

St. Jerry · Post by **St. Jerry** » Jul 20th, '06, 07:47

XtremeJibber2001 wrote:
yeti wrote:I don't understand how anyone - regardless of political orientation or party affiliation - cannot see just how much of an idiot Bush is.
Most politians are IMHO.

For the record, I don't agree with the veto.

In the past presedential election, I felt a lot of people voted against what was in their best interest.

XtremeJibber2001 · Post by **XtremeJibber2001** » Jul 20th, '06, 07:49

St. Jerry wrote:
XtremeJibber2001 wrote:
yeti wrote:I don't understand how anyone - regardless of political orientation or party affiliation - cannot see just how much of an idiot Bush is.
Most politians are IMHO.

For the record, I don't agree with the veto.
In the past presedential election, I felt a lot of people voted against what was in their best interest.

I disagree. In 2004, I voted for the lesser of the two morons. However, classifying someone as a moron is a matter of perspective

shortski · Post by **shortski** » Jul 20th, '06, 08:02

Cityskier wrote: 10 out of 10 cats thing that I may be on to something.

http://us.share.geocities.com/beezskis/ ... r-hres.mov (takes a minute to load)

Some proponent for ethics.

Help me out, what's a "cats thing" and more importantly, why the hell would you want to be on it, you sick bastard

PBAB

Cityskier · Post by **Cityskier** » Jul 20th, '06, 08:19

shortski wrote:
Cityskier wrote: 10 out of 10 cats thing that I may be on to something.

http://us.share.geocities.com/beezskis/ ... r-hres.mov (takes a minute to load)

Some proponent for ethics.
Help me out, what's a "cats thing" and more importantly, why the hell would you want to be on it, you sick bastard

PBAB

Ooooh...you got me there.

Must proofread...must proofread...

BigKahuna13 · Post by **BigKahuna13** » Jul 20th, '06, 12:01

XtremeJibber2001 wrote:
St. Jerry wrote:
XtremeJibber2001 wrote:
yeti wrote:I don't understand how anyone - regardless of political orientation or party affiliation - cannot see just how much of an idiot Bush is.
Most politians are IMHO.

For the record, I don't agree with the veto.
In the past presedential election, I felt a lot of people voted against what was in their best interest.
I disagree. In 2004, I voted for the lesser of the two morons. However, classifying someone as a moron is a matter of perspective

No, even though there are few absolutes in the world there are some people who are absolute morons. Many seem to go into politics for some reason........

XtremeJibber2001 · Post by **XtremeJibber2001** » Jul 20th, '06, 12:11

BigKahuna13 wrote:
XtremeJibber2001 wrote:
St. Jerry wrote:
XtremeJibber2001 wrote:
yeti wrote:I don't understand how anyone - regardless of political orientation or party affiliation - cannot see just how much of an idiot Bush is.
Most politians are IMHO.

For the record, I don't agree with the veto.
In the past presedential election, I felt a lot of people voted against what was in their best interest.
I disagree. In 2004, I voted for the lesser of the two morons. However, classifying someone as a moron is a matter of perspective
No, even though there are few absolutes in the world there are some people who are absolute morons. Many seem to go into politics for some reason........

... so CS is suggesting I go into politics?