Bubba wrote:Well, you're advocating that citizen children be deported, which legally cannot be done. If the parents don't take their kids with them, they're our responsibility, draining our tax dollars for up to 18 years and, in some cases, becoming totally dysfunctional and turning to crime. Alternatively, we set up boarding schools around the country for them, pay for their private education, etc. Does that work for you? Or maybe we'll just reopen our WW II vintage internment camps that the Japanese were placed into out west. How will that sit with you?
No, re-read what I wrote. I said that their parents should be deported and what they do with their kids is up to them seeing as how they were the one that endangered their child's welfare.
I would think very few would leave their children, but for those who do, I'd prefer my taxes go to supporting US Citizens versus a family of illegals.
If the children grew-up in English speaking households, there is a great chance they would actually be more successful then if they grew-up with their law-breaking, border jumping, uneducated, Spanish speaking parents. The same percentage for success exists that exists for the child to turn to crime and illegal activities ... same as it does for children of bona fide US Citizens.
Deport the parents ... let them choose what to do with their children, for those children left in the US that are citizens, I don't object to may tax dollars going to their care .... the alternative is far worse in my opinion.
Bubba wrote:Why should any leave on their own? They came here illegally and they've been here in most cases for years. What makes you think they'll all start marching quietly toward the border? As for the rest, you think we have the resources to even begin processing, incarcerating and deporting even 1 million people? Damn, the jails will be filled; new jails will have to be built; and the justice system will be tied up in knots for years.
Um, why shouldn't we? Some will leave the US and some won't. Heck, some will live their whole lives and never get caught, but many will and many will consequently be deported or start the path of citizenship.
No we don't, which is why illegals should be deported when they're caught. I'm not hoping for a mass round-up, just deport those that are caught. If we don't have the resources, let's allocate some.
Don't jail any of them, just deport them ... unless of course they committed murder, etc.
Bubba wrote:Beating their drum? No. Just explaining the illogic and impracticality of what you advocate. I should also be amazed at your ignorance but, having read your posts here for the past few years, amazement has waned.
Hmm .... enforcing the law is illogical and impractical and the "cost effective, tax payer conscious, no-amnesty-giving" alternative is ....?
My ignorance? I'll admit it when I'm being dense, ignorant, or difficult, but this is not one of these cases. Please select at which points you beleive I'm being ignorant. Sure, my point-of-view and solution may be different then yours, but I don't see how my solution is any more ignorant then your own?
Anyways, to keep things interesting, what's your alternative? I'm all ears.
Personally, having all the numbers/costs would sure help this debate. If I had the time and I knew someone somewhere had the interest, I'd bust all the costs out into a spreadsheet and see what were really talking about. Quite frankly, both you and I are just throwing costs and tax dollars around with no real perspective unto how the numbers really workout.
BigKahuna13 wrote:XtremeJibber2001 wrote:I'm certainly not advocating that "citizens" be deported, not sure how you got that from what I said, but OK. Maybe you're referring to the illegals "anchor children" that were born in the US and are now citizens. Fortunately, this isn't our problem. We deport the parents, what happens to the kids is, up to the parents ... after all, the parents got their kids in the mess to begin with.
Ah no they are potentially OUR problem. They are citizens. They can't be deported. If the parents decide to leave them here - which many may well do figuring life as an orphan in the US is preferable to going home -
they become society's problem.
And that's completely beside the point that it would be immoral for us as a society to force millions of parents to make that choice.
Yes, yes they are our problem. See what I wrote above.
As for being immoral, what do you mean? Is it immoral for us to send a crack whore to jail and leave her child alone and in some type of orphanage? Is it immoral when we split up a family and send someone to jail as is the case with some of the Enron executives? Is it immoral for a supporting father to go to jail for three consecutive DUI's when he has to support a family of 4?
Do you see a trend? All of these parents made that choice when they broke the law. They put their family and children lives and well being at risk and it's not immoral for us to remind them of that just like we do to average US citizens everyday.
If you're advocating that the "family situation" should be taken into account, then in all the cases above, their family situation would have to be taken into account and the charges brought by the prosecutor should fit for the "criminal's" "family situation".