We need to attack Saudi Arabia NOW!

St. Jerry · Post by **St. Jerry** » Jul 16th, '07, 09:19

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/usiraqsaudi ... JJDWUDW7oF

2knees · Post by **2knees** » Jul 16th, '07, 09:50

yeah, thats the solution. more war. Its proven to be highly effective to this point.

XtremeJibber2001 · Post by **XtremeJibber2001** » Jul 16th, '07, 09:51

We could send Nancy and Hillary over there, they'll fix the problem(s)!

Dr. NO · Post by **Dr. NO** » Jul 16th, '07, 17:06

XtremeJibber2001 wrote:We could send Nancy and Hillary over there, they'll fix the problem(s)!

yeah, all the males would commit suicide, bombs or guns to the head, just to get away from them.

Cityskier · Post by **Cityskier** » Jul 16th, '07, 19:25

you don't attack the ones you love

Vinny Vincenzo · Post by **Vinny Vincenzo** » Jul 17th, '07, 07:33

We would have to withdraw our troops before we invaded.

yeti · Post by **yeti** » Jul 17th, '07, 10:46

"We."

Sounds good Jerry. When are YOU signing up?

St. Jerry · Post by **St. Jerry** » Jul 17th, '07, 10:56

Are you saying I don't "support our troops"? My car and office are plastered with those yellow ribbon things.

CAPBOY · Post by **CAPBOY** » Jul 25th, '07, 21:37

This is a great idea. We could create a major repository for radicals and therefore, pull out and justify the nuking.

yeti · Post by **yeti** » Jul 28th, '07, 21:11

Just pointing out the the word "we" is inclusive to you, when of course you are the one who says it.

In a week I am back to Iraqistan. 60 more days and I am done - until I am extended... or get shipped off to the Horn of Africa. Lovely.

I am still waiting for a war to be waged in the Bahamas.

Dr. NO · Post by **Dr. NO** » Jul 28th, '07, 21:14

yeti wrote:Just pointing out the the word "we" is inclusive to you, when of course you are the one who says it.

In a week I am back to Iraqistan. 60 more days and I am done - until I am extended... or get shipped off to the Horn of Africa. Lovely.

I am still waiting for a war to be waged in the Bahamas.

Ah, when Cuba desides to dump it's current regime and needs advisors you may be at the top of the list. I hear they are considering embrassing capitolism there.

Mister Moose · Post by **Mister Moose** » Aug 1st, '07, 12:46

Dr. NO wrote: Ah, when Cuba desides to dump it's current regime and needs advisors you may be at the top of the list. I hear they are considering embrassing capitolism there.

Dr No, I usually can read through your tiepose, but did you mean embarrassing or embracing? Both could apply...

Dr. NO · Post by **Dr. NO** » Aug 1st, '07, 14:23

Mister Moose wrote:
Dr. NO wrote: Ah, when Cuba desides to dump it's current regime and needs advisors you may be at the top of the list. I hear they are considering embrassing capitolism there.
Dr No, I usually can read through your tiepose, but did you mean embarrassing or embracing? Both could apply...

Go with it!

BigKahuna13 · Post by **BigKahuna13** » Aug 1st, '07, 15:45

Mister Moose wrote:
Dr. NO wrote: Ah, when Cuba desides to dump it's current regime and needs advisors you may be at the top of the list. I hear they are considering embrassing capitolism there.
Dr No, I usually can read through your tiepose, but did you mean embarrassing or embracing? Both could apply...

and who's capitol are they gonna embrace? Washington??

Dr. NO · Post by **Dr. NO** » Aug 1st, '07, 17:59

BigKahuna13 wrote:
Mister Moose wrote:
Dr. NO wrote: Ah, when Cuba desides to dump it's current regime and needs advisors you may be at the top of the list. I hear they are considering embrassing capitolism there.
Dr No, I usually can read through your tiepose, but did you mean embarrassing or embracing? Both could apply...
and who's capitol are they gonna embrace? Washington??

Hell yes. Who else would start pouring money into the country once Fidel is gone? Plus all the cuanos in the States would be happy to visit and leave their hard earned money visiting family and such.