No I will not answer your simple request. You have setup a bunch of straw-men based on misstatements and factual errors (no the science does not predict cyclones will increase*. It's a lot more complicated than that and it would require a complex explanation. In addition, species have been displaced**. The scientific literature is filled with hundreds of papers documenting range shifts in the direction predicted by warming. And the atmosphere has warmed in time-frames meaningful to many systems - just three examples of the type of misleading statements you make). And I will not use simple explanations, nor refrain from posting links, or graphs, or pictures of my cat. Who are you to set the terms of a debate? I will gladly share what I know with other readers, but I have no time for games. And I will only debate people who at least get the premises of their arguments correct.Sgt Eddy Brewers wrote:Streamtracker & Coydog .. nice to have you back.
I would suggest you didn't answer my simple request for a simple explanation of how any other purported effect of CO2 can be justified with a chain of casual events... if the primary effect, warming of the atmosphere, is NOT happening.
*"Has there been an increase in late-season tropical storm activity?
Hurricane experts agree that global warming has not led to an increase in the number of tropical cyclones occurring world-wide, and are currently debating whether or not global warming has affected tropical cyclone intensity...."
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMa ... ason-activ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
**Rapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of Climate Warming
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6 ... 4.abstract" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
***And the stock just keeps rising:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/graphics.php?g=47" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;