Just imagine the impact of all the sandwiches that SnoBrdr has gotten for Humpty.
Overall, making your sandwiches at home potentially halves the carbon emissions compared to their prepackaged equivalents.
I've seen those evil cellophane sandwiches at KBL. They must've been causing the r*in.
How dare you hillbillies mock this serious scientific finding. THIS is real science and anyone who doubts it probably doubts the moon landing. It is actual peer-reviewed activist hippy science,...I mean consensus c=science! Understanding the impact on climate change of convenience food: Carbon footprint of sandwiches https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... via%3Dihub" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Doubt it and you are a DENIER!
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
Posted: Feb 8th, '18, 12:12
by Sgt Eddy Brewers
There is No sea level rise and the IPC “scientists” are activist frauds!
A great Article where a top researcher on Sea Levels claims there is No increase in sera level rise (he claims there is currently NO sea level at all!) Translated from German.
Headlines : These researchers have a political agenda
The oceanographer Nils-Axel Mörner opposes the IPCC and the warnings of sinking islands.
Money Quotes:
I've been researching sea-level changes my entire life, traveling to 59 countries. Hardly any other researcher has so much experience in this field.
The IPCC relies in particular on questionable computer models rather than field research.
We checked these data - with the result that they are of very poor quality. One row is influenced by the fact that docks were built on loose sediment near the measuring station, which could have changed tidal heights. For the other series, the measuring station was even moved locally. The researchers who rely on such data are office workers. They are not specialized in coastal dynamics processes and sea level changes. Many of them have no idea of the real conditions.
We were able to prove that the sea level in Fiji from 1550 to about 1700 was about seventy centimeters higher than it is today. Then it sank and was about fifty centimeters lower in the 18th century than it is today. Then he rose to about the current level. In the last 200 years, the level has not changed significantly. For the past 50 to 70 years he has been absolutely stable.
Were you surprised?
Not really. It was not the first time that the claims of the IPCC turned out to be wrong.
Why are many climate researchers warning about sinking islands?
Because they have a political agenda. They are biased by the interpretation that man is causing climate change, and that is a threat. The IPCC was founded with the purpose of representing man-made climate change and of warning against it. His goal was thus fixed from the beginning. And he sticks to it like a dogma - no matter what the facts are. As a specialist in sea level developments, in recent years I have consistently found that the IPCC team does not include a single expert on this issue.
What triggered you to distance yourself from the warnings of manmade climate change?
In 1991, I gave a scientific presentation at a conference on sea level changes in the US. The representative of the IPCC present there responded with great anger to my points of view. This reaction surprised me. Because in science circles is true that you listen to each other and debate on different points of view. As a result, I noticed more and more that the IPCC disseminates completely false information and also adheres to obvious mistakes. I then published a paper on the influence of the sun on the sea level, behind which 19 recognized experts. But the IPCC attacked the work with outrageous claims and caused the scientific journal in which it was published to be discontinued.
You can not stop me. I have published about 650 scientific papers to date. But young colleagues who think critically have no chance given the manipulations. Basically, most science magazine publishers no longer accept work that goes against the claims of the IPCC, regardless of the quality of the work.
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
Posted: Feb 13th, '18, 13:08
by rogman
Sgt Eddy Brewers wrote:There is No sea level rise and the IPC “scientists” are activist frauds!
Blah, blah, blah...
More unhinged than usual, even for you. Where do you find these 80 year old geezers? Can you find anyone that's actually up to date on current sci/tech that agrees with you, or is it just living fossils? TBH, I was ignoring this post of yours, but saw the National Academy of Sciences just published this in their Proceedings, figured I'd pass it along. Prediction: You will learn nothing from it. http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/ ... 5.full.pdf
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
Posted: Feb 13th, '18, 21:03
by Mister Moose
rogman wrote: Where do you find these 80 year old geezers?
Hey now. I don't know about you, but I plan on skiing at 80 and when I get there I'd appreciate not being called a geezer.
Younger than Humpty,
out.
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
Posted: Feb 14th, '18, 15:07
by Sgt Eddy Brewers
rogman wrote:
Sgt Eddy Brewers wrote:There is No sea level rise and the IPC “scientists” are activist frauds!
Blah, blah, blah...
More unhinged than usual, even for you. Where do you find these 80 year old geezers? Can you find anyone that's actually up to date on current sci/tech that agrees with you, or is it just living fossils? TBH, I was ignoring this post of yours, but saw the National Academy of Sciences just published this in their Proceedings, figured I'd pass it along. Prediction: You will learn nothing from it. http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/ ... 5.full.pdf
Can you find anyone that's actually up to date on current sci/tech that agrees with you, or is it just living fossils?
Well heck yeah...just hard to know where to stop there is just SO MUCH "peer reviewed" science published lately that contradicts the "consensus."
For instance: Anthropogenic CO2 warming challenged by 60-year cycle from Earth-Science Reviews
Volume 155, April 2016, Pages 129-135
an analysis of 60 cycle in ocean exchange that suggests the role of Anthropogenic CO2 in sea level rise is NOT DETECTABLE.
Will read your article when I get a chance. Thanks.....just wanted to remind you with my response....
THERE REALLY IS NO ACTUAL CONSENSUS IN CLIMATE SCIENCE.
We are still trying to understand the dynamics of the earth's climate system. NOT settled science.
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
Posted: Mar 11th, '18, 14:58
by Bubba
Pruitt wanted a debate on climate science. Kelly killed it.
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
Posted: Mar 21st, '18, 17:56
by Sgt Eddy Brewers
Sorry to drone on and on but..... for those that follow climate science this is TOO GOOD not to share. The following is a link to a document produced by three eminent scientists for a legal case in California where a significant part of the legal outcome depends on an understanding of what represent objective TRUTH in climate science. The Judge, to his credit, has requested tutorials from both parties to ascertain their claims re truth in climate science. The document made in response to specific questions from the judge is, IMO, quite excellent and easy reasonably thorough (given the venue).
Lots of great graphics and explanations of some core concepts in climate science...to much to copy paste... so here is their overview:
Happer, Koonin, Lindzen
March 19, 2018
Section I: Climate science overview
Our overview of climate science is framed through four statements:
1. The climate is always changing; changes like those of the past half-century are common in the geologic record, driven by powerful natural phenomena
2.Human influences on the climate are a small (1%) perturbation to natural energy flows
3. It is not possible to tell how much of the modest recent warming can be ascribed to human influences
4. There have been no detrimental changes observed in the most salient climate variables and
today’s projections of future changes are highly uncertain
YUP!
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
Posted: Apr 11th, '18, 07:04
by Mister Moose
^ Sure hope that's low VOC paint....
Guaranteed that will be flaking off inside of a year. Then you get white chips into the run-off. Plus the paint will be grey in no time from tire black, grime and blown in dirt. And the surface will be much more slippery when wet.
Interesting experiment though, as we all know black roads (a small percentage of the land mass) get very hot in the summer. With all the variables in play, how much reduction in heating will be seen?
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
Guaranteed that will be flaking off inside of a year. Then you get white chips into the run-off. Plus the paint will be grey in no time from tire black, grime and blown in dirt. And the surface will be much more slippery when wet.
Interesting experiment though, as we all know black roads (a small percentage of the land mass) get very hot in the summer. With all the variables in play, how much reduction in heating will be seen?
Re: Science Rant, Not politics: Can CO2 cause "Climate Chang
