Obama, along with ALL rest of our government were aware of the threat, did NOT ignore it, and still underestimated it in a very reasonable way. reality says otherwise...They aren't psychic, you know.Highway Star wrote:I'm not sure what your point is. I never said it was a great strategy, it's simply a strategy that will succeed.XtremeJibber2001 wrote:Except we're not staying out of it. Obama's strategy, which you claimed earlier to be a successful one, included arming Syrian rebels. It's not clear if you're still trying to support your point about Obama's strategy or conceding his strategy is ineffective.Highway Star wrote:Syria was, and continues to be a no-win situation. Staying out of it for as long as possible is inherently an effective strategy. One could even argue that we are not involved in the syrian civil war - we are eliminating a terror organization which is basically a branch of Al-Queda. Should we have attacked them earlier? Sure. Were there LOTS of reasons not to? Definitely.
Can this even be called a strategy? Should the US only get involved when another country asks for help, even when there may be a threat to US national security?Highway Star wrote:Iraq is an ally and we came to their aide with millitary support when it was proven that they needed it, a relatively nutral governemtn was put in place, and regional countries brought on board.
Are we not aiding the Shiites by bombing the ISIS Sunni's? This is part of Obama's strategy.Highway Star wrote:Iraq's shites have close ties with Iran. We don't want to be seen as aiding only the Shites against the ISIS sunni's, which would really tick off our Sunni allies in the region. (mainly the saudis)
I heard it from the horses mouth, Obama. Sounds like you feel Obama knew about the threat and ignored it. Although your point is contrary to your point earlier where you said "ISIS only became a threat in Iraq in the past year or so".Highway Star wrote:If you think the CIA and DIA go around underestimating the situation anywhere in the middle east, you're kidding yourself and are just looking to hate on the government. They were widely warning throughout the past year that ISIS was growing strongly, going to take territory, etc. Obama, the millitary and congress were ALL aware of it. However, it is still accurate for him to say that he was still suprised by it and underestimated it. Read the full 60-minutes interview from 9/28/14, not just the Fox news spin:
By what you post it seems like you're pretty down on Obama's strategy - sounds like you think he's supporting the wrong people and was slow to act. Stark contrast to your original post where you hailed his strategy as a successful one.
I don't watch FOX and I saw the 60 minutes interview. There's nothing the transcript offers contrary to my point.homostar wrote:Obama's plan is brilliant SERIOUSLY STFU already... yer completely full of $hit...are you f@ckin schizophrenic?
As far as Shite vs. Sunni, it is EXTREMELY important in our current foreign policy that we not be seen as picking sides based on religion, sect, or race.
I haven't made contradictory points, you've made contradictory distortions of what I've said.[/quote]
unless you adjust everything else for inflation this chart has no bearing on your statement about bush and oil prices... where did you go to school? no matter HOW you slice it gasoline cost more per gallon under obama than bush... by a significant amount...
do you even know what "contradictory " means???
here's a clue: Your assertions are contradictory to your premise...
Honestly your "thought" process is painful to watch...