KillingtonZone.com

shortski wrote:Hey let's move the Giants to the NFC South.....that's the only way the contended for a playoff spot in the next 3 years. Boy how the mighty have fallen. They really suck this year.

You know this will just bring out the trolls and the fools to talk about the years gone by glory days.

Nducom Suh (whatever his name is) is a total bush player.
A 1 game suspension is inadequate on his history alone.

(Edited Tuesday) NFL rescinding that suspension on appeal is appalling

Not that it will matter at all.
Romo may break his luck streak this time

Oh, and Book of Manning is due for an appendix.

The NFL STOLE that game from Detroit.

Chancellor's play was textbook
Pete Carroll will always be a twit

Sorry Christie bridge is closed.

No bridge for you.

Another great game with Packers beating down the Cowboys with a little help from the refs.

No hug either.

posting Brownman style (or trying too)

That was purely a makeup call for the Detroit game.

This time Dallas got hosed.

SnoBrdr wrote:

shortski wrote:Hey let's move the Giants to the NFC South.....that's the only way the contended for a playoff spot in the next 3 years. Boy how the mighty have fallen. They really suck this year.

You know this will just bring out the trolls and the fools to talk about the years gone by glory days.

YEAH, 18 and 1 really sucks.

Dr. NO wrote:

SnoBrdr wrote:

shortski wrote:Hey let's move the Giants to the NFC South.....that's the only way the contended for a playoff spot in the next 3 years. Boy how the mighty have fallen. They really suck this year.

You know this will just bring out the trolls and the fools to talk about the years gone by glory days.

YEAH, 18 and 1 really sucks.

You don't win the last one, it does.

prolly a good thing for NBC that Dallas got their due today.
Thereby eliminating the potential of Giant fans boycotting this year's Superbowl broadcast.
Why would a New Yorker wanna' watch their 2 nemeses playing for another world title ?

SnoBrdr wrote:That was purely a makeup call for the Detroit game.

This time Dallas got hosed.

Understand the rule. This was the correct call by rule versus the travesty that occurred last week. Detroit would have rioted if this was not overturned as they lost a game a couple years ago on the exact same call. If Bryant had secured the ball Dallas would have had it at the one. He did not. Its on him.

wanderer7453 wrote:

SnoBrdr wrote:That was purely a makeup call for the Detroit game.

This time Dallas got hosed.

Understand the rule. This was the correct call by rule versus the travesty that occurred last week. Detroit would have rioted if this was not overturned as they lost a game a couple years ago on the exact same call. If Bryant had secured the ball Dallas would have had it at the one. He did not. Its on him.

I understand the rule.

Bryant took about 3 steps and then fumbled the ball. Obviously the steps are a "football move" but once again the NFL sees things their own way.

No biggie to me.

Just kismet.

Instant Karma's gonna get you
Gonna knock you right on the head
You better get yourself together

SnoBrdr wrote:

wanderer7453 wrote:

SnoBrdr wrote:That was purely a makeup call for the Detroit game.

This time Dallas got hosed.

Understand the rule. This was the correct call by rule versus the travesty that occurred last week. Detroit would have rioted if this was not overturned as they lost a game a couple years ago on the exact same call. If Bryant had secured the ball Dallas would have had it at the one. He did not. Its on him.

I understand the rule.

Bryant took about 3 steps and then fumbled the ball. Obviously the steps are a "football move" but once again the NFL sees things their own way.

No biggie to me.

Just kismet.

http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/i ... t-due-refs

You can watch it again at the link above. Dez has one foot touch the ground after the ball is thrown to him, but doesn't have control until the ball hits the ground. Had Dez focused on making the catch, rather than scoring a touchdown, Cowboys would have advanced. Personally, I don't think Dallas should have advanced past Detroit given the non-calls, but what's done is done.

SnoBrdr wrote:

wanderer7453 wrote:

SnoBrdr wrote:That was purely a makeup call for the Detroit game.

This time Dallas got hosed.

Understand the rule. This was the correct call by rule versus the travesty that occurred last week. Detroit would have rioted if this was not overturned as they lost a game a couple years ago on the exact same call. If Bryant had secured the ball Dallas would have had it at the one. He did not. Its on him.

I understand the rule.

Bryant took about 3 steps and then fumbled the ball. Obviously the steps are a "football move" but once again the NFL sees things their own way.

No biggie to me.

Just kismet.

Isn't the ball not caught until Dez touches two feet on the ground? His first move after two feet touch, is a lunge towards the goal line. As part of the lunge, his left toe drags, his knee hits, then the ball hits the ground and comes loose. I don't see three steps after the completion. Should the lunge be considered a football move, with the landing being the second move? I might buy that. Refs appeared to call it the same way they'd call it on the sideline; two feet come down, then the receiver must continue to control the ball through the tackle/end of the play. Dez didn't.

Correct call on a confusing rule. Common sense says he caught the ball, but the letter of the "process" rule and confirming replays show he didn’t. GB finally has a challenge go their way, though it’s gonna be tough to get pass Seattle in Seattle with AR not at 100%.