madhatter wrote:yeah cuz friends of bill go direct to state while all others go " stand in line" at a gov website isn't evidence enough to open an investigation? but it hardly matters since any investigation will be a banana republic investigation like the IRS, benghazi and server investigations were...I'm hardly trying to implicate digicel but pointing out the OBVIOUS pay for play scheme by which friends of bill get direct access to the state dept...that IS illegal...and the media does not care...and you by extension also do not care...
but yet you DO hear how trump MIGHT have avoided taxes for 18 years...with ZERO in the way of proof and fully failing to disclose that he wouldnt be "avoiding" taxes but simpy would not have taxable income or that none of that is in any way illegal, unethical or uncommon...
you DO hear that trump grabbed em on the p@ssy w/o permission despite his quote being " and they let you"
The US Army, working with Haiti on disaster aid, was pushing to get telecomm up and running which is run by Digicel. Digicel couldn't get clearance to bring in their equipment so the CEO leveraged his relationships to escalate his issues to the State Department. Again, hardly anything illegal here and no evidence of pay to play. $.02
are you both ignorant and blind? I didn't say digicel did ANYTHING...I agree the digicel clearance thing c/b simply a matter of improving logistics...we don't know the whole story...
THIS:
“Need you to flag when people are friends of WJC,” wrote Caitlin Klevorick, then a senior State Department official who was juggling incoming offers of assistance being funneled to the State Department by the Clinton Foundation. “Most I can probably ID but not all.”
of course, this directly contradicts comments that Bill Clinton previously made to CBS' Charlie Rose just last month when he assured voters that "nothing was ever done for anybody because they were contributors to the foundation, nothing."
In another Klevorick and Dasai exchange, the State Department official asks “Is this a FOB!” saying that "If not, she should go to cidi.org" (a general government website).
clearly shows that friends of bill got special access that all others did not...how hard is that for you to understand?
mach es sehr schnell
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
madhatter wrote:
“Need you to flag when people are friends of WJC,” wrote Caitlin Klevorick, then a senior State Department official who was juggling incoming offers of assistance being funneled to the State Department by the Clinton Foundation. “Most I can probably ID but not all.”
of course, this directly contradicts comments that Bill Clinton previously made to CBS' Charlie Rose just last month when he assured voters that "nothing was ever done for anybody because they were contributors to the foundation, nothing."
In another Klevorick and Dasai exchange, ]the State Department official asks “Is this a FOB!” saying that "If not, she should go to cidi.org" (a general government website).
clearly shows that friends of bill got special access that all others did not...how hard is that for you to understand?
I get what you're saying. I have issues jumping from "is this a friend of bills" to "the state department did favors for donors to the foundation". You ever treated someone differently based on their relationship with you or one of your close friends? Does that automatically make what you did or discussed illegal or that you broke protocol or played favor to them? There's no smoking gun at the moment, unfortunately.
madhatter wrote:
“Need you to flag when people are friends of WJC,” wrote Caitlin Klevorick, then a senior State Department official who was juggling incoming offers of assistance being funneled to the State Department by the Clinton Foundation. “Most I can probably ID but not all.”
of course, this directly contradicts comments that Bill Clinton previously made to CBS' Charlie Rose just last month when he assured voters that "nothing was ever done for anybody because they were contributors to the foundation, nothing."
In another Klevorick and Dasai exchange, ]the State Department official asks “Is this a FOB!” saying that "If not, she should go to cidi.org" (a general government website).
clearly shows that friends of bill got special access that all others did not...how hard is that for you to understand?
I get what you're saying. I have issues jumping from "is this a friend of bills" to "the state department did favors for donors to the foundation". You ever treated someone differently based on their relationship with you or one of your close friends? Does that automatically make what you did or discussed illegal or that you broke protocol or played favor to them? YESThere's no smoking gun at the moment, unfortunately.
that IS illegal to do in a govt office...definitely enough evidence to go before a grand jury and ask for an indictment...
mach es sehr schnell
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
off course we know that the obama administration will DO ANYTHING to prevent the truth from coming out, cuz he obviously was involved in it..only the dumbest of the dumb in the willfully ignorant are unable to come to that conclusion, ( barely) useful idiots that you are...
mach es sehr schnell
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
off course we know that the obama administration will DO ANYTHING to prevent the truth from coming out, cuz he obviously was involved in it..only the dumbest of the dumb in the willfully ignorant are unable to come to that conclusion, ( barely) useful idiots that you are...
back on topic.......your bicycle evidently has no seat.
