Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
Yes, we shall see
Sox caught fire a trifle too late ... needed a dozen more games
Ramirez and Sandoval needed to implode earlier for them to have any chance.
The Porcello contract is a real problem. Their young arms are showing well.
Nice to see them battling right to the end ... chewing up NY pitching
Sox caught fire a trifle too late ... needed a dozen more games
Ramirez and Sandoval needed to implode earlier for them to have any chance.
The Porcello contract is a real problem. Their young arms are showing well.
Nice to see them battling right to the end ... chewing up NY pitching
Forever .. Goat Path
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
Wouldn't he actually first need a job to take a vacation from? What would he be vacationing from? Unemployment?Bubba wrote:So DON'T take a vacation. See if I care.SnoBrdr wrote:See once again YOU know what's best for all.Bubba wrote:People take vacations. You should try it.SnoBrdr wrote:I call people trolls who act like trolls.
You had a lot to post before the Brady decision was handed down by the judge and then you disappeared.
Now that news organizations are trying to stir up more on the Patriots, you resurface.
You are posting links, that you admit you have not seen/read but you claim that there is smoke there.
Possibly you might want to read what was written in both the SI/ESPN stories.
75% of it was a rehash of many years ago.
The other 25% is unattributed and cannot be checked.
The once name used was that of the Ex Ram's coach and he claims that he did not say the things that the NFL says he did.
Funny that two totally separate organizations were doing the exact same story and released it on the exact same day with no new evidence of anything.
The biggest bombshell of the story is the idea that the other NFL owners are/were trying to punish the Pats for something that they were previously punished for and when they copuld not get the man they wanted, they went after Brady.
I guess in that respect they are like you, who feels he is the arbiter who decides who contributes what.
You are truly a legend in your own mind.
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
In another surprise ruling, Brady and Gostkowski both named Players of the Month.
Pats must've somehow gamed the jury
Have a nice bye week
Pats must've somehow gamed the jury
Have a nice bye week
Forever .. Goat Path
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
brownman wrote:In another surprise ruling, Brady and Gostkowski both named Players of the Month.
Pats must've somehow gamed the jury
Have a nice bye week
Brownie , last time I checked this post was about baseball !
The "RED SOX " opening should of put you in the right sport !
But maybe when they say the Pats are on a " BUY WEEK " they are talking about other things !
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
Buying off the Refs? Buying new Video Equipment? Buying new Headsets for the opposing teams? Buying an air pump?Atomic1 wrote:brownman wrote:In another surprise ruling, Brady and Gostkowski both named Players of the Month.
Pats must've somehow gamed the jury
Have a nice bye week
Brownie , last time I checked this post was about baseball !
The "RED SOX " opening should of put you in the right sport !
But maybe when they say the Pats are on a " BUY WEEK " they are talking about other things !
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
True as they did pick up both a nice LB from Chiraq and a DT from NO for basically nothing.Atomic1 wrote:brownman wrote:In another surprise ruling, Brady and Gostkowski both named Players of the Month.
Pats must've somehow gamed the jury
Have a nice bye week
Brownie , last time I checked this post was about baseball !
The "RED SOX " opening should of put you in the right sport !
But maybe when they say the Pats are on a " BUY WEEK " they are talking about other things !
Beware of fools & trolls here, they lurk everywhere.
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
Back on topic and protocol.
Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.
Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.
Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.
Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.
Forever .. Goat Path
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
yeah like 40 times...brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.
Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.
Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.
mach es sehr schnell
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
or at least 27.....madhatter wrote:yeah like 40 times...brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.
Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.
Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
40 pennants...junior wrote:or at least 27.....madhatter wrote:yeah like 40 times...brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.
Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.
Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.
mach es sehr schnell
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
And 27 World Championships...madhatter wrote:40 pennants...junior wrote:or at least 27.....madhatter wrote:yeah like 40 times...brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.
Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.
Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
hey, he said playoffs...junior wrote:And 27 World Championships...madhatter wrote:40 pennants...junior wrote:or at least 27.....madhatter wrote:yeah like 40 times...brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.
Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.
Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.
mach es sehr schnell
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
Take solace in the 27.
Getting to the #4 slot this season is what I'm referring to ... Bucky.
Getting to the #4 slot this season is what I'm referring to ... Bucky.
Forever .. Goat Path
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
yanks will seal the deal as far as a WC appearance I'd think, but hey who knows...sox fans are always gleeful about any postseason appearance as a measure of success, except when they don't make it...yanks may not be a powerhouse or the odds on favorite this year but they still make the "playoffs" nearly every season, a sort of bottom line of acceptable outcomes.. much easier to count the times they don't make it... With the sox it's quite the opposite...brownman wrote:Take solace in the 27.
Getting to the #4 slot this season is what I'm referring to ... Bucky.
I'm always happy to see the yanks make a postseason appearance though no doubt disappointed if they are eliminated at any point during... as any fan of any team would be in similar circumstances...
mach es sehr schnell
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .
They haven't gotten there yet as the Sox refuse to lay down for them.madhatter wrote:yanks will seal the deal as far as a WC appearance I'd think, but hey who knows...sox fans are always gleeful about any postseason appearance as a measure of success, except when they don't make it...yanks may not be a powerhouse or the odds on favorite this year but they still make the "playoffs" nearly every season, a sort of bottom line of acceptable outcomes.. much easier to count the times they don't make it... With the sox it's quite the opposite...brownman wrote:Take solace in the 27.
Getting to the #4 slot this season is what I'm referring to ... Bucky.
I'm always happy to see the yanks make a postseason appearance though no doubt disappointed if they are eliminated at any point during... as any fan of any team would be in similar circumstances...
Three in a row against the EE's best pitchers.
Beware of fools & trolls here, they lurk everywhere.