Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post here for sports discussions not related to skiing or riding
brownman
Postinator
Posts: 7351
Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 17:59
Location: Stockbridge Boulevard

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by brownman »

Yes, we shall see :like

Sox caught fire a trifle too late ... needed a dozen more games :sad:
Ramirez and Sandoval needed to implode earlier for them to have any chance.
The Porcello contract is a real problem. Their young arms are showing well.
Nice to see them battling right to the end ... chewing up NY pitching :-)

:Toast
Forever .. Goat Path
junior
Signature Poster
Posts: 15690
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 10:01
Location: 2200 feet

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by junior »

Bubba wrote:
SnoBrdr wrote:
Bubba wrote:
SnoBrdr wrote:I call people trolls who act like trolls.

You had a lot to post before the Brady decision was handed down by the judge and then you disappeared.

Now that news organizations are trying to stir up more on the Patriots, you resurface.

You are posting links, that you admit you have not seen/read but you claim that there is smoke there.

Possibly you might want to read what was written in both the SI/ESPN stories.

75% of it was a rehash of many years ago.

The other 25% is unattributed and cannot be checked.

The once name used was that of the Ex Ram's coach and he claims that he did not say the things that the NFL says he did.

Funny that two totally separate organizations were doing the exact same story and released it on the exact same day with no new evidence of anything.

The biggest bombshell of the story is the idea that the other NFL owners are/were trying to punish the Pats for something that they were previously punished for and when they copuld not get the man they wanted, they went after Brady.

I guess in that respect they are like you, who feels he is the arbiter who decides who contributes what.

You are truly a legend in your own mind.
People take vacations. You should try it.
See once again YOU know what's best for all.
So DON'T take a vacation. See if I care. :roll:
Wouldn't he actually first need a job to take a vacation from? What would he be vacationing from? Unemployment?
Image
Image
brownman
Postinator
Posts: 7351
Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 17:59
Location: Stockbridge Boulevard

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by brownman »

In another surprise ruling, Brady and Gostkowski both named Players of the Month.
Pats must've somehow gamed the jury :lol:

Have a nice bye week :oops:
Forever .. Goat Path
Atomic1
Level 10K poster
Posts: 13371
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 10:21
Location: Southington Ct.

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by Atomic1 »

brownman wrote:In another surprise ruling, Brady and Gostkowski both named Players of the Month.
Pats must've somehow gamed the jury :lol:

Have a nice bye week :oops:

Brownie , last time I checked this post was about baseball !
The "RED SOX " opening should of put you in the right sport !
But maybe when they say the Pats are on a " BUY WEEK " they are talking about other things !
junior
Signature Poster
Posts: 15690
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 10:01
Location: 2200 feet

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by junior »

Atomic1 wrote:
brownman wrote:In another surprise ruling, Brady and Gostkowski both named Players of the Month.
Pats must've somehow gamed the jury :lol:

Have a nice bye week :oops:

Brownie , last time I checked this post was about baseball !
The "RED SOX " opening should of put you in the right sport !
But maybe when they say the Pats are on a " BUY WEEK " they are talking about other things !
Buying off the Refs? Buying new Video Equipment? Buying new Headsets for the opposing teams? Buying an air pump?
Image
Image
SnoBrdr
Whipping Post
Posts: 9521
Joined: Jun 18th, '07, 04:45

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by SnoBrdr »

Atomic1 wrote:
brownman wrote:In another surprise ruling, Brady and Gostkowski both named Players of the Month.
Pats must've somehow gamed the jury :lol:

Have a nice bye week :oops:

Brownie , last time I checked this post was about baseball !
The "RED SOX " opening should of put you in the right sport !
But maybe when they say the Pats are on a " BUY WEEK " they are talking about other things !
True as they did pick up both a nice LB from Chiraq and a DT from NO for basically nothing.
Beware of fools & trolls here, they lurk everywhere.
brownman
Postinator
Posts: 7351
Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 17:59
Location: Stockbridge Boulevard

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by brownman »

Back on topic and protocol.

Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.

Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.

:Toast
Forever .. Goat Path
madhatter
Signature Poster
Posts: 18340
Joined: Apr 2nd, '08, 17:26

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by madhatter »

brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.

Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.

Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.

:Toast
yeah like 40 times...
mach es sehr schnell

'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
junior
Signature Poster
Posts: 15690
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 10:01
Location: 2200 feet

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by junior »

madhatter wrote:
brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.

Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.

Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.

:Toast
yeah like 40 times...
or at least 27.....
Image
Image
madhatter
Signature Poster
Posts: 18340
Joined: Apr 2nd, '08, 17:26

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by madhatter »

junior wrote:
madhatter wrote:
brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.

Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.

Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.

:Toast
yeah like 40 times...
or at least 27.....
40 pennants...
mach es sehr schnell

'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
junior
Signature Poster
Posts: 15690
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 10:01
Location: 2200 feet

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by junior »

madhatter wrote:
junior wrote:
madhatter wrote:
brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.

Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.

Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.

:Toast
yeah like 40 times...
or at least 27.....
40 pennants...
And 27 World Championships...
Image
Image
madhatter
Signature Poster
Posts: 18340
Joined: Apr 2nd, '08, 17:26

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by madhatter »

junior wrote:
madhatter wrote:
junior wrote:
madhatter wrote:
brownman wrote:Back on topic and protocol.

Lowly Sox sweeping tonite would be high point of a dreadful season.
Yankees are demonstrating their inability to close.

Playoff history has a way of repeating itself.

:Toast
yeah like 40 times...
or at least 27.....
40 pennants...
And 27 World Championships...
hey, he said playoffs...

mach es sehr schnell

'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
brownman
Postinator
Posts: 7351
Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 17:59
Location: Stockbridge Boulevard

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by brownman »

Take solace in the 27.

Getting to the #4 slot this season is what I'm referring to ... Bucky.

:Toast
Forever .. Goat Path
madhatter
Signature Poster
Posts: 18340
Joined: Apr 2nd, '08, 17:26

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by madhatter »

brownman wrote:Take solace in the 27.

Getting to the #4 slot this season is what I'm referring to ... Bucky.

:Toast
yanks will seal the deal as far as a WC appearance I'd think, but hey who knows...sox fans are always gleeful about any postseason appearance as a measure of success, except when they don't make it...yanks may not be a powerhouse or the odds on favorite this year but they still make the "playoffs" nearly every season, a sort of bottom line of acceptable outcomes.. much easier to count the times they don't make it... With the sox it's quite the opposite...


I'm always happy to see the yanks make a postseason appearance though no doubt disappointed if they are eliminated at any point during... as any fan of any team would be in similar circumstances...
mach es sehr schnell

'exponential reciprocation'- The practice of always giving back more than you take....
SnoBrdr
Whipping Post
Posts: 9521
Joined: Jun 18th, '07, 04:45

Re: Red Sox "B" Boys Young Bucks . . .

Post by SnoBrdr »

madhatter wrote:
brownman wrote:Take solace in the 27.

Getting to the #4 slot this season is what I'm referring to ... Bucky.

:Toast
yanks will seal the deal as far as a WC appearance I'd think, but hey who knows...sox fans are always gleeful about any postseason appearance as a measure of success, except when they don't make it...yanks may not be a powerhouse or the odds on favorite this year but they still make the "playoffs" nearly every season, a sort of bottom line of acceptable outcomes.. much easier to count the times they don't make it... With the sox it's quite the opposite...


I'm always happy to see the yanks make a postseason appearance though no doubt disappointed if they are eliminated at any point during... as any fan of any team would be in similar circumstances...
They haven't gotten there yet as the Sox refuse to lay down for them.

Three in a row against the EE's best pitchers.
Beware of fools & trolls here, they lurk everywhere.
Post Reply