KillingtonZone.com

madhatter wrote:

Bubba wrote:

Coydog wrote:

steamboat1 wrote:

The Tsarnaev family came here on a travel visa and later obtained political asylum when that visa expired. They were not refugees and did not undergo the extensive refugee vetting process. However you make a good point, the brothers were Muslim and came as children. They were later radicalized by both foreign and domestic influences. So we really don’t know where the next terrorist will come from, but we know they will be Muslim.

Clearly, the House bill does not go far enough - we need to seal our borders to all refugees, certainly all Muslim refugees. But that doesn’t address the huge problem of Muslims already here in the homeland. Some have called for a national database of all Muslim citizens who would be issued a simple ID card. In fact, with today’s technology, we should also consider micro-chiping them. Why would anyone object if they don’t have anything to hide?

Once the Muslim population has been properly identified and tracked, they could be evacuated to a number of "safe spaces" located far away from major population centers. This would be a matter of mutual protection and a temporary measure, lasting only until victory is achieved in the war on terror. With the Muslim community secured, we could then engage in a national debate on a more final solution to the Muslim threat.

No doubt this would be complex logistical challenge, but other countries have instituted similar programs in the past and achieved great success with impressive efficiency. And we have American exceptionalism on our side.

Just sayin'.

What would we call those "safe places"? Reservations? Temporary internment camps? Concentration camps? I know....let's put all those on government assistance to work in the camps too. Then we could hang a sign at the entrance that says Arbeit Macht Frei.

And think of the benefit to the railroad and railcar industries with all the new demand for train travel...

pretty sure coydogs comment was sarcasm...colbert kinda thing...

madhatter wrote:there's a number of reasons why taking refugees is not of benefit, what is the benefit really? vs the detriment? its really a simple equation with a definite answer...but how often do we see that , cough cough gruber, when one has already decided their preferred course of action the math isn't a factor of consequence but a conveniently ignored matter of irrelevance ...

Rime & Reason wrote:

madhatter wrote:there's a number of reasons why taking refugees is not of benefit, what is the benefit really? vs the detriment? its really a simple equation with a definite answer...but how often do we see that , cough cough gruber, when one has already decided their preferred course of action the math isn't a factor of consequence but a conveniently ignored matter of irrelevance ...

What is the benefit? Get a heart! Ask yourself for once, “What would Jesus do?” I don’t think he’d be loading up the trains.

madhatter wrote:^^^^^^^^KZone is no longer a safe space^^^^^^^^

Rime & Reason wrote:

madhatter wrote:^^^^^^^^KZone is no longer a safe space^^^^^^^^

Bet you wish you'd stayed anonymous now. That Freeski is gonna get us all killed.

freeski wrote:

Rime & Reason wrote:

madhatter wrote:^^^^^^^^KZone is no longer a safe space^^^^^^^^

Bet you wish you'd stayed anonymous now. That Freeski is gonna get us all killed.

I was not the first to do it, although mine was larger. If anyone did get hurt I'd feel bad so...
Pretty sad state of affairs.

brownman wrote:Hellfire and Damn nation
Raytheon shares at $127.04 & Lockheed at $226.10

brownman wrote:Whatevah ... reading contrail signatures is not in my wheelhouse
My point ... those stocks are rated 'Buy' for good reason.

shortski wrote:

brownman wrote:Whatevah ... reading contrail signatures is not in my wheelhouse
My point ... those stocks are rated 'Buy' for good reason.

GE also looking good and shares s lot cheaper.