Page 22 of 30

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: May 26th, '17, 12:04
by freeski
We need more strikes like this. It's the only way to get rid of the worst faction of people the world has ever seen.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/ ... 495809551/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: May 26th, '17, 23:07
by deadheadskier
freeski wrote:We need more strikes like this. It's the only way to get rid of the worst faction of people the world has ever seen.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/ ... 495809551/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Yes, mainly bombing a bunch of women and children is a sure fire way to stamp out terrorism. :roll:

It's worked perfectly over the past few decades. The terrorists are really starting to slow down now!

Consider for a moment that twisted suicide bombers like in Manchester last week also think if we just bomb the enemy one more time, they'll stop bombing us.

What we need is the middle eastern people to start policing themselves. You know, say Saudi Arabia. We just sold them a bunch of guns. Let them deal with the situation. America First!!!!

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: May 27th, '17, 12:39
by Bubba
http://start.att.net/news/read/article/ ... jures_1-ap" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Two people died Friday and another was hurt in a stabbing on a Portland light-rail train after a man yelled racial slurs at two young women who appeared to be Muslim, one of whom was wearing a hijab, police said.

Officers arrested a man Friday afternoon who ran from the train, The Oregonian/OregonLive reported (https://goo.gl/PKo777" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ). Police were still working Friday night to identify the man and the people who were attacked.

Before the stabbing the assailant on the train was ranting on many topics, using "hate speech or biased language," and then turned his focus on the women, police Sgt. Pete Simpson said.

"In the midst of his ranting and raving, some people approached him and appeared to try to intervene with his behavior and some of the people that he was yelling at," Simpson told The Oregonian. "They were attacked viciously."

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: May 27th, '17, 14:24
by freeski
Turn about is not always fair play. There was probably only a 35% chance they supported jihad. He'll never be a free man again and rightfully so.

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: May 27th, '17, 18:21
by XtremeJibber2001
Bubba wrote:http://start.att.net/news/read/article/ ... jures_1-ap

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Two people died Friday and another was hurt in a stabbing on a Portland light-rail train after a man yelled racial slurs at two young women who appeared to be Muslim, one of whom was wearing a hijab, police said.

Officers arrested a man Friday afternoon who ran from the train, The Oregonian/OregonLive reported (https://goo.gl/PKo777" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ). Police were still working Friday night to identify the man and the people who were attacked.

Before the stabbing the assailant on the train was ranting on many topics, using "hate speech or biased language," and then turned his focus on the women, police Sgt. Pete Simpson said.

"In the midst of his ranting and raving, some people approached him and appeared to try to intervene with his behavior and some of the people that he was yelling at," Simpson told The Oregonian. "They were attacked viciously."
People are idiots. These two men likely saved these girls lives. Too much hate these days, unjustified hate at that.

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: May 27th, '17, 21:34
by deadheadskier
freeski wrote:Turn about is not always fair play. There was probably only a 35% chance they supported jihad. He'll never be a free man again and rightfully so.
Expand upon this. What do you truly mean/believe?

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: May 28th, '17, 07:27
by freeski
One could say, the two girls were muslim and part of the jihad movement to destroy the west. If this was true the killer's actions could be justified under the saying "turnabout is fair play". However, the girls were most likely just minding their own business and not terrorists or supporters. So, the guy is in the wrong.

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: May 28th, '17, 08:22
by deadheadskier
freeski wrote:One could say, the two girls were muslim and part of the jihad movement to destroy the west. If this was true the killer's actions could be justified under the saying "turnabout is fair play". However, the girls were most likely just minding their own business and not terrorists or supporters. So, the guy is in the wrong.
Say these two girls were white. Would you say the same thing on a chance they might be white supremacists?

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: May 29th, '17, 11:25
by freeski
What if they were Russians? :shock:

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: Jun 1st, '17, 07:29
by madhatter
Image

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: Jun 3rd, '17, 18:18
by freeski
Hat trick for London over last month or so. The new muslim mayor is doing a great job. :|

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: Jun 4th, '17, 09:19
by freeski
May: "Something has to change".
How about this, if there is a cleric preaching hate, jihad, imprison the cleric AND close the mosque. London let hundreds if not thousands of muslims in and there will always be two to take the place of one jihadist. Katy Perry is over there for the bomb concert. I wonder if she's out walking the streets without security showing love to the terrorists :?: Nope...

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: Jun 4th, '17, 13:41
by freeski
London attack has been classified as a Bruce Jenner/Kathy Griffin attack (car/knife). 7 dead, 50 injured. May wants to regulate the internet. :shock: :-x

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: Jun 5th, '17, 07:03
by XtremeJibber2001
Image

Re: More Muslim Violence

Posted: Jun 5th, '17, 08:17
by Bubba
Trump attacked his own Justice Department in a tweet this morning and simultaneously undercut their stated position that the travel ban was not a ban but merely a pause to "find out what's going on ". Furthermore, since the "pause" was only for 90 days and more than 90 days has passed, the court can legitimately ask what they've learned since, presumably, the administration has been studying the issue with or without the pause in place. Unless the court chooses to focus solely on the issue of presidential authority under the law (clearly an issue) Trump and the administration have undercut if not obliterated their own position.