NSR AG Sessions plans to end the fun
Posted: Jan 4th, '18, 10:43
Welcome to the Killington Zone Message Board
https://www.killingtonzone.com/forums/
Your evidence of this claim.rogman wrote:He has personal investments in private prisons. Do the math.
like always yer dumber than a box of rocks...congress needs to change the federal law...you can't simply grant states the right to ignore federal law...deadheadskier wrote:Party of state rights and a smaller, less intrusive federal government my ass. Only when it applies to their ideals.
Swamp is plenty full, just smells a little different
Stop Global Meme-ing.SnoBrdr wrote:Your evidence of this claim.rogman wrote:He has personal investments in private prisons. Do the math.
https://www.truthorfiction.com/jeff-ses ... e-prisons/
You may be technically correct, but deadheadskier statement is also correct. In my opinion, if enough of the population votes to legalize it then it should be more valid then the dc swamp. I could care less if people smoke, just don't block getting on the gondola.madhatter wrote:like always yer dumber than a box of rocks...congress needs to change the federal law...you can't simply grant states the right to ignore federal law...deadheadskier wrote:Party of state rights and a smaller, less intrusive federal government my ass. Only when it applies to their ideals.
Swamp is plenty full, just smells a little different
well the problem is if you have the head of state ( POTUS) ruling by decree you don't have states rights at all...if lead from behind obama wanted it legal he should have asked congress to take it up, but like always he only votes "present" so as not to actually take a position at all...biged wrote:You may be technically correct, but deadheadskier statement is also correct. In my opinion, if enough of the population votes to legalize it then it should be more valid then the dc swamp. I could care less if people smoke, just don't block getting on the gondola.madhatter wrote:like always yer dumber than a box of rocks...congress needs to change the federal law...you can't simply grant states the right to ignore federal law...deadheadskier wrote:Party of state rights and a smaller, less intrusive federal government my ass. Only when it applies to their ideals.
Swamp is plenty full, just smells a little different
Folks: we have a POLITICAL board page elsewhere on the K-zone. Please limit the Chatter board to non-political issues....thanks! The Political Board page will more than welcome your posts and remarks...Thanks!
This was not posted as a political discussion but to show that this DoJ plans to actually enforce the current laws that are on the books.Powderputz wrote:Folks: we have a POLITICAL board page elsewhere on the K-zone. Please limit the Chatter board to non-political issues....thanks! The Political Board page will more than welcome your posts and remarks...Thanks!