KillingtonZone.com

http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/04/politics/ ... index.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... urish.html

He has personal investments in private prisons. Do the math.

Party of state rights and a smaller, less intrusive federal government my ass. Only when it applies to their ideals.

Swamp is plenty full, just smells a little different

rogman wrote:He has personal investments in private prisons. Do the math.

Your evidence of this claim.

https://www.truthorfiction.com/jeff-ses ... e-prisons/

deadheadskier wrote:Party of state rights and a smaller, less intrusive federal government my ass. Only when it applies to their ideals.

Swamp is plenty full, just smells a little different

like always yer dumber than a box of rocks...congress needs to change the federal law...you can't simply grant states the right to ignore federal law...

SnoBrdr wrote:

rogman wrote:He has personal investments in private prisons. Do the math.

Your evidence of this claim.

https://www.truthorfiction.com/jeff-ses ... e-prisons/

Stop Global Meme-ing.

madhatter wrote:

deadheadskier wrote:Party of state rights and a smaller, less intrusive federal government my ass. Only when it applies to their ideals.

Swamp is plenty full, just smells a little different

like always yer dumber than a box of rocks...congress needs to change the federal law...you can't simply grant states the right to ignore federal law...

You may be technically correct, but deadheadskier statement is also correct. In my opinion, if enough of the population votes to legalize it then it should be more valid then the dc swamp. I could care less if people smoke, just don't block getting on the gondola.

biged wrote:

madhatter wrote:

deadheadskier wrote:Party of state rights and a smaller, less intrusive federal government my ass. Only when it applies to their ideals.

Swamp is plenty full, just smells a little different

like always yer dumber than a box of rocks...congress needs to change the federal law...you can't simply grant states the right to ignore federal law...

You may be technically correct, but deadheadskier statement is also correct. In my opinion, if enough of the population votes to legalize it then it should be more valid then the dc swamp. I could care less if people smoke, just don't block getting on the gondola.

well the problem is if you have the head of state ( POTUS) ruling by decree you don't have states rights at all...if lead from behind obama wanted it legal he should have asked congress to take it up, but like always he only votes "present" so as not to actually take a position at all...

I'm not against it at all but legalizing at the state level while remaining criminal at the federal level is not actually legalizing it at all...it's ridiculous that its a schedule one drug and congress should act to reclassify/decriminalize/legalize etc...

but to say that the trump admin wants to intrude on states rights ( that in this case they don't actually have but might have if congress changed the law) or personal liberties or whatever DHS said is just partisan quackery...Trump has said in the past that congress should change the law if that's what the people want...til then federal law will "trump" local law as it always has in the past...

Time to move this thread where it belongs

When states go full 420, the cops who opposed: truth, justice and the American way need to resign. We don't need dickheads limiting our god given right to persue happiness.

Justice ROO out.

If 2/3 of the States go 420, Congress will act if they haven't already done so.

This may well force Congress to pick a side.

Alabama
Maybe AlfredE will recuse himself.
He's good at only that.

The Pot business is booming.
Economic utopia for some States.
Train has left the station.

SnoBrdr wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/04/politics/ ... index.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... urish.html

Folks: we have a POLITICAL board page elsewhere on the K-zone. Please limit the Chatter board to non-political issues....thanks! The Political Board page will more than welcome your posts and remarks...Thanks!

Powderputz wrote:

SnoBrdr wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/04/politics/ ... index.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... urish.html

Folks: we have a POLITICAL board page elsewhere on the K-zone. Please limit the Chatter board to non-political issues....thanks! The Political Board page will more than welcome your posts and remarks...Thanks!

This was not posted as a political discussion but to show that this DoJ plans to actually enforce the current laws that are on the books.

No wonder you have "putz" in your name.