madhatter wrote:whatever....you @sswipes will never accept the results of the 2016 election...no need for anyone else to give a fvck what you " think"...XtremeJibber2001 wrote:Suppose I should have just believed Trump.madhatter wrote:of course....took ya 3-4 days to get word from your masters....ya gotta do what they tell you...XtremeJibber2001 wrote:As more details emerge it’s clear the “Mexico deal” amounts to a little more than nothing.
XtremeJibber2001 wrote:madhatter wrote:whatever....you @sswipes will never accept the results of the 2016 election...no need for anyone else to give a fvck what you " think"...XtremeJibber2001 wrote:Suppose I should have just believed Trump.madhatter wrote:of course....took ya 3-4 days to get word from your masters....ya gotta do what they tell you...XtremeJibber2001 wrote:As more details emerge it’s clear the “Mexico deal” amounts to a little more than nothing.
crybabies...sore loser TDS afflicted crybabies...madhatter wrote:XtremeJibber2001 wrote:madhatter wrote:whatever....you @sswipes will never accept the results of the 2016 election...no need for anyone else to give a fvck what you " think"...XtremeJibber2001 wrote:Suppose I should have just believed Trump.madhatter wrote:of course....took ya 3-4 days to get word from your masters....ya gotta do what they tell you...
HILLARYOUS....
laughing....orange man bad...just the deal to keep asylum seekers in mexico until their hearing date was a win...stepped up enforcement of mexico's southern border was also a help...democrats? no help at all...you? crybaby TDS afflicted whiner...no worries though Biden is gonna save the day if beto doesn't first....hahhahahahahahahah....XtremeJibber2001 wrote:madhatter wrote:XtremeJibber2001 wrote:madhatter wrote:whatever....you @sswipes will never accept the results of the 2016 election...no need for anyone else to give a fvck what you " think"...XtremeJibber2001 wrote:
Suppose I should have just believed Trump.
HILLARYOUS....
madhatter wrote:laughing....orange man bad...just the deal to keep asylum seekers in mexico until their hearing date was a win...stepped up enforcement of mexico's southern border was also a help...democrats? no help at all...you? crybaby TDS afflicted whiner...no worries though Biden is gonna save the day if beto doesn't first....hahhahahahahahahah....
let us know when MSNBC tells you what to think next....sad, so sad...
you've been saying that and similar since election day or longer...XtremeJibber2001 wrote:madhatter wrote:laughing....orange man bad...just the deal to keep asylum seekers in mexico until their hearing date was a win...stepped up enforcement of mexico's southern border was also a help...democrats? no help at all...you? crybaby TDS afflicted whiner...no worries though Biden is gonna save the day if beto doesn't first....hahhahahahahahahah....
let us know when MSNBC tells you what to think next....sad, so sad...
what did we give up? not imposing tariffs that we can still impose at any time if we so choose? would more concessions from mexico be better? duh...is it easy to enforce an agreement with the crooked govt of mexico? nope...can we impose tariffs if they fail to reach and maintain objectives? yep...is there hope for people w severe TDS such as yourself? doesn't seem so...just the deal to keep asylum seekers in mexico until their hearing date was a win...stepped up enforcement of mexico's southern border was also a help...democrats? no help at all...
Kpdemello wrote:What a fiasco this whole situation is.
A secret agreement that Mexico doesn't think is a secret.
An agreement to do all the things Mexico was already doing.
And Trump supporters lining up to praise him for this terrific piece of total incompetence.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Under the agreement, Mexico vowed to deploy of thousands of National Guard units to the Mexico-Guatemala border. Hoping to ease concerns that Mexico is looking to militarize the border, Bárcena Coqui stressed the National Guard is a "police force," similar to militarized police units in European countries like Spain and France.
The joint declaration unveiled by both governments also includes a provision that says the U.S. will "immediately expand the implementation" of "Remain in Mexico," officially called the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP). More than 10,000 asylum seekers have been returned to Mexico by U.S. authorities to await court hearings as the Trump administration prepares for the expansion of the controversial practice.
Under the resolution, Mexico made a remarkable commitment to not only allow those returned to stay in Mexico, but also provide them with work permits, health care and education — something immigration advocates have said has not occurred yet on a large scale.
Bárcena Coqui said she expects the new measures undertaken by both her government and the U.S. to curb migration flows from Central America in the coming weeks.
"We would hope that these will bring results in a very relative short term, like in a month or a month and a half," she said.
In Sunday tweets, the president wrote that "some things not mentioned in yesterday [sic] press release, one in particular, were agreed upon" and "will be announced at the appropriate time." Mexican Ambassador to the U.S. Martha Bárcena suggested in an interview Sunday with CBS News’ “Face the Nation” that additional agreements could surface beyond what the nations included in the joint statement.
as always the sore loser ( barely) useful idiot class is sucking on sour grapes...GFYS...Trump, meanwhile, kept open Sunday the possibility of slapping future tariffs on Mexico if there is not a significant drop in Central American migrants trying to enter the United States.
“We can always go back to our previous, very profitable, position of Tariffs,” he wrote on Twitter. “But I don’t believe that will be necessary.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/16/signs-p ... -tone.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;China suddenly added a new member to its negotiating team — the country’s commerce minister Zhong Shan, who was present at last month’s G-20 summit and took part in a telephone conversation with the U.S. representatives last week. Zhong is seen by many officials in Washington as a hardliner, a sign the Chinese leader Xi Jinping is standing firm, the Washington Post reported.
His recent remarks in the Chinese press indicated his tough stance in the trade war.
“The U.S. side has provoked economic and trade frictions against us and violated the principles of the WTO. It is typical of unilateralism and protectionism,” Zhong told the People’s Daily on Monday, according to a Google translation. “We have to uphold our warrior spirit in firmly defending national and people’s interests in defending the multilateral trading system.” The People’s Daily is the official newspaper for the Communist Party in China.
The new development dampened analysts and investors’ hope for a resolution as some see the progress “in reverse.”
not very informed huh?Kpdemello wrote:So we're ten days past the one year anniversary of Trump's China tariffs. I figure it's a pretty good time to assess how things are going.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/16/signs-p ... -tone.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;China suddenly added a new member to its negotiating team — the country’s commerce minister Zhong Shan, who was present at last month’s G-20 summit and took part in a telephone conversation with the U.S. representatives last week. Zhong is seen by many officials in Washington as a hardliner, a sign the Chinese leader Xi Jinping is standing firm, the Washington Post reported.
His recent remarks in the Chinese press indicated his tough stance in the trade war.
“The U.S. side has provoked economic and trade frictions against us and violated the principles of the WTO. It is typical of unilateralism and protectionism,” Zhong told the People’s Daily on Monday, according to a Google translation. “We have to uphold our warrior spirit in firmly defending national and people’s interests in defending the multilateral trading system.” The People’s Daily is the official newspaper for the Communist Party in China.
The new development dampened analysts and investors’ hope for a resolution as some see the progress “in reverse.”
Hmm... not so well, huh?
https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/hitt ... 22505.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Hong Kong (CNN Business)China's economic growth has slumped to its lowest level in nearly three decades as the world's second largest economy feels the effects of a prolonged trade war with the United States.
The country's gross domestic product grew at 6.2% in the quarter ended June, the slowest quarterly growth rate since 1992 and down from 6.4% in the previous quarter, according to government figures released on Monday.
And the Chinese economy will continue to face "downward pressure" in the second half of this year, the country's National Bureau of Statistics said in a statement.
"The Chinese economy is still in a complex and grave situation," it said. "Global growth has slowed and external uncertainties are on the rise."
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-ma ... 2019-07-14" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Hitting the brakes: China's economy slows to 27-year low
https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/15/investin ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
U.S. manufacturers move production from China as tariff tensions continue
Published: July 14, 2019 7:37 p.m. ET
And companies that leave China don’t expect to move back
or did you mean not so well for china?Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite close at new record highs
By Anneken Tappe, CNN Business
Updated 4:21 PM ET, Mon July 15, 2019
Kpdemello wrote:So we're ten days past the one year anniversary of Trump's China tariffs. I figure it's a pretty good time to assess how things are going.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/16/signs-p ... -tone.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;China suddenly added a new member to its negotiating team — the country’s commerce minister Zhong Shan, who was present at last month’s G-20 summit and took part in a telephone conversation with the U.S. representatives last week. Zhong is seen by many officials in Washington as a hardliner, a sign the Chinese leader Xi Jinping is standing firm, the Washington Post reported.
His recent remarks in the Chinese press indicated his tough stance in the trade war.
“The U.S. side has provoked economic and trade frictions against us and violated the principles of the WTO. It is typical of unilateralism and protectionism,” Zhong told the People’s Daily on Monday, according to a Google translation. “We have to uphold our warrior spirit in firmly defending national and people’s interests in defending the multilateral trading system.” The People’s Daily is the official newspaper for the Communist Party in China.
The new development dampened analysts and investors’ hope for a resolution as some see the progress “in reverse.”
Hmm... not so well, huh?
Fixed it for you.Kpdemello wrote:Our economy is fine. I wasn't commenting on that. I was commenting on how impatient I am for the Trump tariffs to be effective at getting China to agree on anything.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk