Kpdemello wrote:f.a.s.t. wrote:You're missing the point. Americans have every right to prove their innocence if they want to, no body is forcing them to do it. Asking or forcing someone to turn over their birth certificate if they don't want to is not the same thing.
So are you.
There's no credible evidence of these claims against Omar, so why should she have to prove anything to you?
actually there's NOTHING to dispel them...and AFAIK the DOJ is investigating...
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/arti ... -dna-test/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
DNA TESTING
Even if those restrictions are loosened, refugees applying for family reunification will face another hurdle to clear: DNA testing.
The inspiration for this requirement was born in East Africa, where more than 1 million Somalians have been displaced from their country by civil war and famine. In the mid-2000s, the U.S. was providing refuge to about 10,000 Somalians a year — many of whom went on to apply to the family reunification program to bring over relatives.
Immigration officials suspected that some were inventing “ghost children,” and filling out applications for children not related to them. There had even been some reports of brokers who sold the ghost children’s slots for profit, according to a U.S. Department of State official who spoke to FRONTLINE but asked not to be named.
So in early 2008, the State Department launched a pilot program to determine the extent of fraud by testing relationships using DNA.
In the initial pilot of 476 applicants in Nairobi, Kenya, only 16 percent were genetically related to every person they said was in their family. Another 39 percent tested false for at least one family member. In the remaining 45 percent of cases, applicants either refused to participate or didn’t show up for the test.
Officials interpreted these results as proof of widespread fraud. The P-3 program was suspended, and did not reopen for more than four years.
This stunned refugees around the world, many of whom had spent years waiting for P-3 applications to be approved. Most were told to apply for an alternate visa, but it was even more restrictive than P-3 and soon had a multi-year waiting list.
The suspension was likewise criticized by refugee advocates, who argued that fraud wasn’t the only explanation for the pilot program’s results. For example, if a family had five children and just one tested false, they would all be counted as fraudulent. And if any member of the family didn’t show up for a test, that family would also be considered fraudulent, even if the no-show was for a legitimate reason.
if she's a fraud she needs a one way ticket to somalia...DNA test would be conclusive...
as far as credible claims maybe you need to brush up, she certainly committed tax fraud, she also committed campaign finance fraud...
there is a plethora of evidence provided and omar has offered nothing to refute any of it...
https://www.twincities.com/2019/06/06/i ... oard-says/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin ... ijacked-it" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
There is evidence that she entered a sham marriage, committed federal and state tax fraud, and lied about it. There is also compelling, if not yet undeniable evidence, that she perjured herself.
Whether a Republican or Democrat, a sitting member of Congress entering a sham marriage, committing multiple crimes to cover it up, and lying to the public to do so would render them unelectable in any sane world.
But Omar has been protected from this story by two threeforces. One is a media that leans left and is terrified of a story that touches on immigration, faith, and marriage. The second is President Trump, who has chosen to broach this issue in the most ham-fisted, blockheaded manner.the third of course is Kpdemento...
"Well," the president said as an afterthought this weekend. "There's a lot of talk about the fact that she was married to her brother."
And boom goes the news cycle.
In a standard reaction, Will Sommer at the Daily Beast deemed the entire Omar story, not just the "brother" allegations but also the charge of a sham marriage, "baseless" and "Pizzagate-levels of delusion."
Sommer is wrong. But he's smart enough to know that crackpots who compare Twitter bans and verification losses to the literal Holocaust and Trump himself have tainted the waters so deeply that a complicit media cartel can willfully ignore a story that, of right, is a scandal.
local Minnesota news site Alpha News did compelling objective reporting into ample social media posts that suggest that Omar and her former husband Ahmed Elmi — the one accused of being her brother — kept in contact after she swore they were incommunicado.
The rest of the Minnesota media ignored the story, even after Alpha News laid out a trail other reporters could follow. But then anti-Muslim activists like Laura Loomer and Brigitte Gabriel jumped on the story, effectively handing the press a blank check to write it off as a vast right-wing conspiracy.
But then more evidence popped up, and it was harder to ignore.
Two pieces of critical evidence recently emerged: first that Omar jointly filed taxes with her current husband Ahmed Hirsi while married to Elmi, and next that her campaign team had shut down a reporter inquiring into the matter of her marriages in 2016. Then, it became a matter of national news concern. The Star Tribune addressed this, and the Washington Examiner investigated it. The evidence we found was overwhelming, at least insofar as it indicates that for some reason, whatever it may be, Omar is covering up the intention of her marriage from 2009 to 2011.
I'm sure you're all for investigating this right? If she has nothing to hide it shouldn't be a problem... we need to KNOW EVERYTHING about our elected officials, right? and if she gained citizenship fraudulently that citizenship needs to be revoked...
