Welcome to the Killington Zone Message Board
https://www.killingtonzone.com/forums/
The Fulton County District Attorney’s office said some fake electors for Donald Trump have implicated each other in potential criminal activity and is seeking to disqualify their lawyer, according to a new court filing.
The district attorney’s office is requesting that attorney Kimberly Bourroughs Debrow be disqualified from representing a group of 10 Republicans who served as electors for the former president in Georgia – a state Trump lost to President Joe Biden. The DA’s office also accused the lawyer of failing to present an immunity deal to her clients last year, according to the filing.
The new filing offers the latest indication that immunity offers could still be in the works months after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis suggested charging decisions were “imminent.”
In mid-January 2021, two men hired by former President Donald Trump's legal team discussed over text message what to do with data obtained from a breached voting machine in a rural county in Georgia, including whether to use it as part of an attempt to decertify the state's pending Senate runoff results.
The texts, sent two weeks after operatives breached a voting machine in Coffee County, Georgia, reveal for the first time that Trump allies considered using voting data not only to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, but also in an effort to keep a Republican hold on the US Senate.
"Here's the plan. Let's keep this close hold," Jim Penrose, a former NSA official working with Trump lawyer Sidney Powell to access voting machines in Georgia, wrote in a January 19 text to Doug Logan, CEO of Cyber Ninjas, a firm that purports to run audits of voting systems.
In the text, which was obtained by CNN and has not been previously reported, Penrose references the upcoming certification of Democrat Jon Ossoff's win over Republican David Perdue.
"We only have until Saturday to decide if we are going to use this report to try to decertify the Senate run-off election or if we hold it for a bigger moment," Penrose wrote, referring to a potential lawsuit.
The plot to breach voting systems in Coffee County, coordinated by members of Trump's legal team including Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, is part of a broader criminal investigation into 2020 election interference led by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA1ak5pd“It was Donald Trump’s words. It was his motivation. It was his anger that caused what occurred on January 6th in your amazing and beautiful city,” said Nayib Hassan, a lawyer for the Proud Boy’s national chair Enrique Tarrio during closing arguments in the trial Tuesday.
“It was not Enrique Tarrio. They want to use Enrique Tarrio as a scapegoat for Donald Trump and those in power.”
The "whole I am not accountable for my own actions" point of view.easyrider16 wrote: ↑Apr 25th, '23, 10:46 sounds about right:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA1ak5pd“It was Donald Trump’s words. It was his motivation. It was his anger that caused what occurred on January 6th in your amazing and beautiful city,” said Nayib Hassan, a lawyer for the Proud Boy’s national chair Enrique Tarrio during closing arguments in the trial Tuesday.
“It was not Enrique Tarrio. They want to use Enrique Tarrio as a scapegoat for Donald Trump and those in power.”
Lawyers representing David Shafer, the embattled chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, are arguing their client should not be charged with any crimes for his actions following the 2020 election because he was following advice provided by attorneys working for former President Donald Trump, according to a letter sent to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis last week.
Specifically, Shafer’s attorneys say their client was relying on “repeated and detailed advice of legal counsel” when he organized a group of “contingent” electors from Georgia and served as one himself, thus “eliminating any possibility of criminal intent or liability,” according to a copy of the May 5 letter.
Ahem....where have I heard "I was just following orders" before?XtremeJibber2001 wrote: ↑May 9th, '23, 06:39 It all points back to one man ...
Georgia GOP chairman says he was just following orders from Trump lawyers
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/08/politics ... index.html
Lawyers representing David Shafer, the embattled chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, are arguing their client should not be charged with any crimes for his actions following the 2020 election because he was following advice provided by attorneys working for former President Donald Trump, according to a letter sent to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis last week.
Specifically, Shafer’s attorneys say their client was relying on “repeated and detailed advice of legal counsel” when he organized a group of “contingent” electors from Georgia and served as one himself, thus “eliminating any possibility of criminal intent or liability,” according to a copy of the May 5 letter.
Here I thought the GOP was the party of personal accountability.Bubba wrote: ↑May 9th, '23, 10:29Ahem....where have I heard "I was just following orders" before?XtremeJibber2001 wrote: ↑May 9th, '23, 06:39 It all points back to one man ...
Georgia GOP chairman says he was just following orders from Trump lawyers
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/08/politics ... index.html
Lawyers representing David Shafer, the embattled chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, are arguing their client should not be charged with any crimes for his actions following the 2020 election because he was following advice provided by attorneys working for former President Donald Trump, according to a letter sent to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis last week.
Specifically, Shafer’s attorneys say their client was relying on “repeated and detailed advice of legal counsel” when he organized a group of “contingent” electors from Georgia and served as one himself, thus “eliminating any possibility of criminal intent or liability,” according to a copy of the May 5 letter.
This isn't exactly following orders so much as it is someone claiming to follow legal advice but ignorance of the law is no excuse.
easyrider16 wrote: ↑May 9th, '23, 10:54So the defense is, how could they have known this was against the law when their legal counsel advised them that this was an acceptable course of action under the law?
A valid point I am sure the prosecution is sure to raise. Of course the defense might say, these are officers of the court who have a duty not to give people bad legal advice or to advise people to do things that are illegal. But again, I'm not sure this argument can carry the day.Stormchaser wrote: ↑May 9th, '23, 11:04Not even his attorney(s) tho correct? Advice from a lawyer for someone else?
Trump desperately needs to win over independents and last nights townhall on CNN will do anything but that.easyrider16 wrote: ↑May 11th, '23, 07:02 He is still claiming election fraud, and his supporters are cheering him on. These are blatant lies at this point.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... i-AA1b1XfW
Also interesting is the post-interview Q&A with Trump supporters at the town hall:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... i-AA1b25FZ