Page 5 of 5

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:27
by Scotty K
Okay, first, learn how to spell "patsy"

And, yes, you do seem to be a pawn for the right

It does not seem like you read my points well before bashing them.

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:31
by DMC
CAPBOY wrote:Don't recall that, but I wouldn't be surprised. I don't pay attention to the cheap rhetoric, especially since I am convinced there
will be another attack.
You mean - you didnt pay attention to Repulican cheap rhetoric??
Cause you just mentioned Charlie Rangels rhetoric...

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:34
by CAPBOY
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:Don't recall that, but I wouldn't be surprised. I don't pay attention to the cheap rhetoric, especially since I am convinced there
will be another attack.
You mean - you didnt pay attention to Repulican cheap rhetoric??
Cause you just mentioned Charlie Rangels rhetoric...
No, it wasn't chuck's rhetoric. He proposed a bill on the draft I guess about a year before the elections. And then the Kerry campaign tried to make it an issue that Bush was trying to revive the draft. It wasn't rhetoric.

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:35
by CAPBOY
Scotty K wrote:Okay, first, learn how to spell "patsy"

And, yes, you do seem to be a pawn for the right

It does not seem like you read my points well before bashing them.
I read your posts and they are certainly well thought out and intelligent. Don't take it so personally!

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:37
by CAPBOY
Scotty K wrote:Okay, first, learn how to spell "patsy"

And, yes, you do seem to be a pawn for the right

It does not seem like you read my points well before bashing them.
Oh! the spelling and grammar police caught me !!!!!!!!

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:39
by DMC
CAPBOY wrote:
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:Don't recall that, but I wouldn't be surprised. I don't pay attention to the cheap rhetoric, especially since I am convinced there
will be another attack.
You mean - you didnt pay attention to Repulican cheap rhetoric??
Cause you just mentioned Charlie Rangels rhetoric...
No, it wasn't chuck's rhetoric. He proposed a bill on the draft I guess about a year before the elections. And then the Kerry campaign tried to make it an issue that Bush was trying to revive the draft. It wasn't rhetoric.
Sounds like a bunch of rhetoric to me...
blah blah blah...

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:41
by CAPBOY
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:Don't recall that, but I wouldn't be surprised. I don't pay attention to the cheap rhetoric, especially since I am convinced there
will be another attack.
You mean - you didnt pay attention to Repulican cheap rhetoric??
Cause you just mentioned Charlie Rangels rhetoric...
No, it wasn't chuck's rhetoric. He proposed a bill on the draft I guess about a year before the elections. And then the Kerry campaign tried to make it an issue that Bush was trying to revive the draft. It wasn't rhetoric.
Sounds like a bunch of rhetoric to me...
blah blah blah...
From your favorite news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/07/rangel.draft/

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:43
by CAPBOY
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:Don't recall that, but I wouldn't be surprised. I don't pay attention to the cheap rhetoric, especially since I am convinced there
will be another attack.
You mean - you didnt pay attention to Repulican cheap rhetoric??
Cause you just mentioned Charlie Rangels rhetoric...
No, it wasn't chuck's rhetoric. He proposed a bill on the draft I guess about a year before the elections. And then the Kerry campaign tried to make it an issue that Bush was trying to revive the draft. It wasn't rhetoric.
Sounds like a bunch of rhetoric to me...
blah blah blah...
But then again, you are mingling two seperate issues again....

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:47
by DMC
CAPBOY wrote:Sounds like a bunch of rhetoric to me...
blah blah blah...
From your favorite news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/07/rangel.draft/[/quote]

First of all - CNN is not my favorite news source.. So PLEASE stop assuming you know me - it's annoying me...

Second of all who cares what Charlie said about the draft? I mean - it's just like Bush trying to change the constitution...
It will never happen...

right???

rhetoric
n 1: using language effectively to please or persuade

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:48
by DMC
CAPBOY wrote:
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:Don't recall that, but I wouldn't be surprised. I don't pay attention to the cheap rhetoric, especially since I am convinced there
will be another attack.
You mean - you didnt pay attention to Repulican cheap rhetoric??
Cause you just mentioned Charlie Rangels rhetoric...
No, it wasn't chuck's rhetoric. He proposed a bill on the draft I guess about a year before the elections. And then the Kerry campaign tried to make it an issue that Bush was trying to revive the draft. It wasn't rhetoric.
Sounds like a bunch of rhetoric to me...
blah blah blah...
But then again, you are mingling two seperate issues again....
Rhetoric is rhetoric

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 09:59
by CAPBOY
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:Sounds like a bunch of rhetoric to me...
blah blah blah...
From your favorite news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/07/rangel.draft/
First of all - CNN is not my favorite news source.. So PLEASE stop assuming you know me - it's annoying me...

Second of all who cares what Charlie said about the draft? I mean - it's just like Bush trying to change the constitution...
It will never happen...

right???

rhetoric
n 1: using language effectively to please or persuade[/quote]

Then I guess what I am pointing out is the IRONY of Kerry & Edwards RHETORIC regarding the DRAFT that the instilled FEAR in the hearts of YOUNG PEOPLE by making them think BUSH was trying to bring back the DRAFT when all along it was their buddy RANGEL that proposed bringing it back.

2 a : skill in the effective use of speech b : a type or mode of language or speech; also : insincere or grandiloquent language

Now, I am going out back and I am going to shoot myself because we are trading ddictionary definitions, officially making us losers.

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 10:04
by DMC
CAPBOY wrote:Now, I am going out back and I am going to shoot myself because we are trading ddictionary definitions, officially making us losers.
Just a bunch of rhetoric....

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 10:12
by CAPBOY
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:Now, I am going out back and I am going to shoot myself because we are trading ddictionary definitions, officially making us losers.
Just a bunch of rhetoric....
LOL

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 10:13
by CAPBOY
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:Now, I am going out back and I am going to shoot myself because we are trading ddictionary definitions, officially making us losers.
Just a bunch of rhetoric....
And btw, please note in advance that if I call you an A-hole, unlike Dr. No, I mean it in the most affectionate possible meaning of the word :D

Posted: Nov 24th, '04, 10:25
by DMC
CAPBOY wrote:
DMC wrote:
CAPBOY wrote:Now, I am going out back and I am going to shoot myself because we are trading ddictionary definitions, officially making us losers.
Just a bunch of rhetoric....
And btw, please note in advance that if I call you an A-hole, unlike Dr. No, I mean it in the most affectionate possible meaning of the word :D
F you - bump boy.... ;)