Vote for Killington

[blakeslee_a]

Sugarloaf with 3489 and k with 2539

[shortski]

Sugarloaf 3857 Killington 2799

Com'on people show some support.

[freeski]

voted

[SnoBrdr]

voted

Just once ?

[Highway Star]

Voting is over, Killington lost by about 900 votes. Some serious cheating going on.....I voted about 500+ times using a macro and adblocker disabling most of the junk loading on the page....on two computers. Was just enough to keep up with who was spamming the sugarloaf votes, but not enough to gain any ground on them.

[Nikoli]

Voting is over, Killington lost by about 900 votes. Some serious cheating going on.....I voted about 500+ times using a macro and adblocker disabling most of the junk loading on the page....on two computers. Was just enough to keep up with who was spamming the sugarloaf votes, but not enough to gain any ground on them.

Next time use Fiddler. You can capture HTTP traffic and then replay it in a loop. The sky's the limit.

[Highway Star]

Voting is over, Killington lost by about 900 votes. Some serious cheating going on.....I voted about 500+ times using a macro and adblocker disabling most of the junk loading on the page....on two computers. Was just enough to keep up with who was spamming the sugarloaf votes, but not enough to gain any ground on them.

Next time use Fiddler. You can capture HTTP traffic and then replay it in a loop. The sky's the limit.

Probably way over my head, but I'll take a look at it. Thanks!!!

[Dr. NO]

HS, throughout this campaign seems you too PLEASURE posting that K was losing. If K is so bad, why the F*** are you here? If you have to post, at least support the hill and people that love it.

[Highway Star]

HS, throughout this campaign seems you too PLEASURE posting that K was losing.

Errr, no? I voted for Killington 500+ times and spent several hours at it.

[SnoBrdr]

HS, throughout this campaign seems you too PLEASURE posting that K was losing.

Errr, no? I voted for Killington 500+ times and spent several hours at it.

Yup you did mention that before.

Guess we both did.

Next time will use Fiddler.

[Dickc]

These "vote off's" are meaningless unless they use filter software to prevent spamming. Killington should have won this hands down.

[SnoBrdr]

These "vote off's" are meaningless unless they use filter software to prevent spamming. Killington should have won this hands down.

Not sure what "filtering" SW you mean, with all the stuff that's around today it's near impossible to stop someone who wants to cast a ton of votes.

[Dr. NO]

These "vote off's" are meaningless unless they use filter software to prevent spamming. Killington should have won this hands down.

Not sure what "filtering" SW you mean, with all the stuff that's around today it's near impossible to stop someone who wants to cast a ton of votes.

Like many social media, provide a valid e-mail address to register before you can post or vote on that site. Yeah, some spam experts will find a way around it but if you have to have an e-mail address that requires a response pretty difficult to spam the vote.
500 votes in one day with required DIFFERENT contacts? Good Luck with that.

[SnoBrdr]

These "vote off's" are meaningless unless they use filter software to prevent spamming. Killington should have won this hands down.

Not sure what "filtering" SW you mean, with all the stuff that's around today it's near impossible to stop someone who wants to cast a ton of votes.

Like many social media, provide a valid e-mail address to register before you can post or vote on that site. Yeah, some spam experts will find a way around it but if you have to have an e-mail address that requires a response pretty difficult to spam the vote.
500 votes in one day with required DIFFERENT contacts? Good Luck with that.

If you had to supply and then go thru the process of verifying your email address before you could vote, I'd bet very few would even bother.