KillingtonZone.com

Which they'll still have in the K1, Vale, Bear, and Skyeship lots, as well as the closer spots to the village.

Trying to picture spring skiing without the Supe access road. I don't like the picture.

The access road isn't going anywhere, at least up by Superstar.

snoloco wrote: ↑May 8th, '24, 17:46 The access road isn't going anywhere, at least up by Superstar.

Don't know what you mean by "up by Superstar", but where is the Supe access road in this drawing?

Why are we still looking at old notional drawings without scale or accuracy? These are wet dreams.

Count me in for a condo on Yodeler Run though.

snoloco wrote: ↑May 8th, '24, 17:28 Which they'll still have in the K1, Vale, Bear, and Skyeship lots, as well as the closer spots to the village.

Half of the Bear lot will be gone soon with the development there. If you look at the drawing above Vale is gone and covered with a development. And the KBL lot is shrunk with all the parking near the bubble and Bay 1 gone. And then of course no one will be able to park on the road. We all know the lots overflow and the road is parked down to the look out on busy weekends. Skyship parking extends a mile in either direction on route 4. So I’m just trying to come up with a percentage of parking lost in my head but I’m going to say 2/3rds of the existing parking disappears. I hear people thinking that property values of existing property in the area increases with the village. Considering how much less desirable the ski experience will be with all the ski to your car parking gone, is that really a logical conclusion? Will we really see an increase in skier visits? Will more people want to “live” here in places where driving and shuttling is the norm?? Demand is what drives prices. I’m sure some group of people will buy their way out of the inconvenience and buy in the village. But will more people be clamoring for this kind of crappy and inconvenient experience after the village is build vs now?

That's a conceptual drawing from 20 years ago, and it's not necessarily representative of what's being built now. As for being able to ski back to the car, on the days I ski at Stratton, I park at the Sun Bowl and do just that. It's actually closer to the snow surface than many of Killington's lots.

WCAX story on Killington projects.

https://www.wcax.com/2024/05/09/constru ... e-project/

So where on these drawings is the replacement parking lots? Will killington become a private resort for only the homeowners?

Big Bob wrote: ↑May 10th, '24, 05:43 So where on these drawings is the replacement parking lots? Will killington become a private resort for only the homeowners?

Parking lots will line the access road from Mary Lou's up to the Distillery. There is a map somewhere.

180 wrote: ↑May 10th, '24, 08:02

Big Bob wrote: ↑May 10th, '24, 05:43 So where on these drawings is the replacement parking lots? Will killington become a private resort for only the homeowners?

Parking lots will line the access road from Mary Lou's up to the Distillery. There is a map somewhere.

Unless they put a lift and a “ski to the parking lots” trail in, that ruins Killington. For me and I’m sure many other folks, if I have to deal with that it makes it such a cluster f that it’s not really worth going. For the 5-10 day a year skier that fully immerses themselves into the Disney like experience of a ski day, that may be ok. But for folks who live nearby and want to ski every day and still balance family, a job, etc that is not workable.

Parking highlighted

Skivt2 wrote: ↑May 10th, '24, 09:55

180 wrote: ↑May 10th, '24, 08:02

Big Bob wrote: ↑May 10th, '24, 05:43 So where on these drawings is the replacement parking lots? Will killington become a private resort for only the homeowners?

Parking lots will line the access road from Mary Lou's up to the Distillery. There is a map somewhere.

Unless they put a lift and a “ski to the parking lots” trail in, that ruins Killington. For me and I’m sure many other folks, if I have to deal with that it makes it such a cluster f that it’s not really worth going. For the 5-10 day a year skier that fully immerses themselves into the Disney like experience of a ski day, that may be ok. But for folks who live nearby and want to ski every day and still balance family, a job, etc that is not workable.

The "5-10 day a year skier" is where all the money is. They spend money on rentals for the kids, lunch for the family, maybe some cocktails, maybe some lessons etc. People like me with weekday passes that ski a few million vert per year and bring their own lunch are a DISASTER for Killington. In the past 4 years, other than my season pass, I've spent a grand total of $70 at Killington. When it gets late in the season I always watch my back because I suspect Solimano's got a hitman out looking for me...

As far as K is concerned, I'm a deadbeat and should ski at Okemo or Sugarbush.

But don't sweat the parking situation, at this pace, its likely to only impact your great grandchildren.

Probably so but some of the work force lives here for the easy skiing access. I’m not sure making it less attractive to live the lifestyle is in Killington’s interest either. When a couple forks over $2,500 to $3,000 for two season passes every year. The 5-10 day skier is skiing typically on an icon pass. How much does K get for Icon redemptions? And if that person stays at an Airbnb and brings their lunch too, are they actually more valuable then a full pass holder? I mean passes are not exactly free.

Skivt2 wrote: ↑May 10th, '24, 09:55

180 wrote: ↑May 10th, '24, 08:02

Big Bob wrote: ↑May 10th, '24, 05:43 So where on these drawings is the replacement parking lots? Will killington become a private resort for only the homeowners?

Parking lots will line the access road from Mary Lou's up to the Distillery. There is a map somewhere.

Unless they put a lift and a “ski to the parking lots” trail in, that ruins Killington. For me and I’m sure many other folks, if I have to deal with that it makes it such a cluster f that it’s not really worth going. For the 5-10 day a year skier that fully immerses themselves into the Disney like experience of a ski day, that may be ok. But for folks who live nearby and want to ski every day and still balance family, a job, etc that is not workable.

Agree - remote lots with a shuttle would be a big downgrade... especially for those of us who like to boot up at the car for short outings.