Posted: Nov 30th, '06, 11:52
not sure. Lemme check.Stormchaser wrote:"Quality" life of the hakkas is prob 2x the michelins. do they cost 2x more?SkiDork wrote:OK, so...
Hakkas or X-Ice?
Welcome to the Killington Zone Message Board
https://www.killingtonzone.com/forums/
not sure. Lemme check.Stormchaser wrote:"Quality" life of the hakkas is prob 2x the michelins. do they cost 2x more?SkiDork wrote:OK, so...
Hakkas or X-Ice?
Is that because the Hakkas become harder as they wear, thus reducing their ability for traction? I know the Blizzak is very soft for about 25 K miles then lasts another 40K due to the hard rubber base.Stormchaser wrote:"Quality" life of the hakkas is prob 2x the michelins. do they cost 2x more?SkiDork wrote:OK, so...
Hakkas or X-Ice?
Take a closer look. It is a Race Volunteer we all know and love.SkiDork wrote:is that Mr Moose in your sig pic?
is frau sehr aware of this?Dr. NO wrote:Take a closer look. It is a Race Volunteer we all know and love.SkiDork wrote:is that Mr Moose in your sig pic?
Gotta be. nobody else dresses like that. FINN? where are ya. Is that you or someone else?SkiDork wrote:it ain't finn....
I think Finn's jacket is all red.SkiDork wrote:that is not finn.. I'm positive.
It's some dude.
I've never run the X-Ice. The studded Hakka SUVs on the Mountaineer have 3 winters (30K miles?) on them with tons of life left. When I bought them, they were really the only option in a studded tire with lots of siping cuts. You're not going to want studs. I'd think the performance between the Hakka SUV (not studded) and the X-Ice will be similar since they have a similar amount of siping. Consumer Reports rated the X-Ice #1 so it's not going to suck.SkiDork wrote:Here's a question (hopefully Geoff sees this one)
I have an opportunity to get a set of 4 snows plus rims (b-day/xmas gift)
Would it be better to get:
1) Michelin X-Ice from Costco to take advantage of their lifetime tire/rim switch deal
or
2) Go for Hakkas from another tire vendor, but sacrifice the lifetime rim switch deal?
i.e. are the hakkas SOOO much better than the Michelin X-Ice's that its worth sacrificing the rim switch deal?
cool. Yeah, you're right. Althought it would be nice to have studs it's just not practical. So I'll look into the price differentail between the hakkas and the michelins.Geoff wrote:I've never run the X-Ice. The studded Hakka SUVs on the Mountaineer have 3 winters (30K miles?) on them with tons of life left. When I bought them, they were really the only option in a studded tire with lots of siping cuts. You're not going to want studs. I'd think the performance between the Hakka SUV (not studded) and the X-Ice will be similar since they have a similar amount of siping. Consumer Reports rated the X-Ice #1 so it's not going to suck.SkiDork wrote:Here's a question (hopefully Geoff sees this one)
I have an opportunity to get a set of 4 snows plus rims (b-day/xmas gift)
Would it be better to get:
1) Michelin X-Ice from Costco to take advantage of their lifetime tire/rim switch deal
or
2) Go for Hakkas from another tire vendor, but sacrifice the lifetime rim switch deal?
i.e. are the hakkas SOOO much better than the Michelin X-Ice's that its worth sacrificing the rim switch deal?
Either tire is going to be far better than your stock tire on ice and that's where heavy SUVs need the most help to get safety margin cornering and braking. I'll bet the X-Ice is far cheaper than a Nokian so I'd shop on price if I racked up the miles you do going to Killington every weekend.
SkiDork wrote:cool. Yeah, you're right. Althought it would be nice to have studs it's just not practical. So I'll look into the price differentail between the hakkas and the michelins.Geoff wrote:I've never run the X-Ice. The studded Hakka SUVs on the Mountaineer have 3 winters (30K miles?) on them with tons of life left. When I bought them, they were really the only option in a studded tire with lots of siping cuts. You're not going to want studs. I'd think the performance between the Hakka SUV (not studded) and the X-Ice will be similar since they have a similar amount of siping. Consumer Reports rated the X-Ice #1 so it's not going to suck.SkiDork wrote:Here's a question (hopefully Geoff sees this one)
I have an opportunity to get a set of 4 snows plus rims (b-day/xmas gift)
Would it be better to get:
1) Michelin X-Ice from Costco to take advantage of their lifetime tire/rim switch deal
or
2) Go for Hakkas from another tire vendor, but sacrifice the lifetime rim switch deal?
i.e. are the hakkas SOOO much better than the Michelin X-Ice's that its worth sacrificing the rim switch deal?
Either tire is going to be far better than your stock tire on ice and that's where heavy SUVs need the most help to get safety margin cornering and braking. I'll bet the X-Ice is far cheaper than a Nokian so I'd shop on price if I racked up the miles you do going to Killington every weekend.
What about the "free tire rotation/switching" deal at Costco? Is that only worth it if you on;y have one set of rims and actually require remounting? Or is is still worthwhile even to have them switch the rims with the tires on them?
I don't know about Costco but at BJ's, you get free tire rotation whcih you can use to swap winter and summer rims & tires. They'll mount new tires with new valve stems for free once when you buy the tires. If you don't have spare winter rims, they'll charge you the mounting fee every 6 months. Tire people claim it's bad for a tire to mount and unmount it many times. I don't know if that's true.SkiDork wrote:cool. Yeah, you're right. Althought it would be nice to have studs it's just not practical. So I'll look into the price differentail between the hakkas and the michelins.Geoff wrote:I've never run the X-Ice. The studded Hakka SUVs on the Mountaineer have 3 winters (30K miles?) on them with tons of life left. When I bought them, they were really the only option in a studded tire with lots of siping cuts. You're not going to want studs. I'd think the performance between the Hakka SUV (not studded) and the X-Ice will be similar since they have a similar amount of siping. Consumer Reports rated the X-Ice #1 so it's not going to suck.SkiDork wrote:Here's a question (hopefully Geoff sees this one)
I have an opportunity to get a set of 4 snows plus rims (b-day/xmas gift)
Would it be better to get:
1) Michelin X-Ice from Costco to take advantage of their lifetime tire/rim switch deal
or
2) Go for Hakkas from another tire vendor, but sacrifice the lifetime rim switch deal?
i.e. are the hakkas SOOO much better than the Michelin X-Ice's that its worth sacrificing the rim switch deal?
Either tire is going to be far better than your stock tire on ice and that's where heavy SUVs need the most help to get safety margin cornering and braking. I'll bet the X-Ice is far cheaper than a Nokian so I'd shop on price if I racked up the miles you do going to Killington every weekend.
What about the "free tire rotation/switching" deal at Costco? Is that only worth it if you on;y have one set of rims and actually require remounting? Or is is still worthwhile even to have them switch the rims with the tires on them?