Six Peaks Killington
Moderators: SkiDork, spanky, Bubba
Re: Six Peaks Killington
Needs to pass bond vote in November based on building guarantees from resort, SP land selling to a developer.
They'd like to start next year, we will see
They'd like to start next year, we will see
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 26942
- Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 08:42
- Location: Where the climate suits my clothes
Re: Six Peaks Killington
It's possible, but...
1. SP Land needs to finalize a deal with the developer (the only one that is interested, even with TIF).
2. The Selectboard will have to approve issuing bonds, which realistically will require presales of residential real estate presumably in an amount required for taxes to cover the bonds. The Town's attorney will also have to ensure that the developer and SP Land provide security guarantees to cover the bonds.
3. Assuming that all takes place, the voters of Killington will have to approve the Town issuing bonds.
Can all this happen? Yes. Will all this happen? Not necessarily. The developer (Great Gulf Residential) has lots of experience developing residential and commercial real estate but has little to no experience with resort residential development. Their only resort property to date is a 59 unit lakeside development in Ontario. The president of the resort division has years of experience but only joined the parent company in March 2022. Will the parent company really commit to all that's necessary for a development of this size? Time will tell...
"Abandon hope all ye who enter here"
Killington Zone
You can checkout any time you like,
but you can never leave
"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function" =
F. Scott Fitzgerald
"There's nothing more frightening than ignorance in action" - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Killington Zone
You can checkout any time you like,
but you can never leave
"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function" =
F. Scott Fitzgerald
"There's nothing more frightening than ignorance in action" - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Re: Six Peaks Killington
Most of the Great Gulf development is in Ontario, which seems to be entering a real estate correction. Wonder if that will impact plans for K
-
- Post Office
- Posts: 4722
- Joined: Nov 10th, '19, 15:56
Re: Six Peaks Killington
Killington receives preliminary TIF approval, a move that could revitalize the town’s resort village
https://vtdigger.org/2022/07/04/killing ... t-village/
https://vtdigger.org/2022/07/04/killing ... t-village/
-
- Bumper
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Oct 23rd, '21, 09:27
Re: Six Peaks Killington
or leave local homeowners in a fiscal abyss. Try using your GOOD eye
-
- Postaholic
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Mar 15th, '18, 09:27
Re: Six Peaks Killington
That's not how TIF districts work...
-
- Post Office
- Posts: 4722
- Joined: Nov 10th, '19, 15:56
Re: Six Peaks Killington
Just to be clear, I was quoting the headline in the story, not trying to express my opinion. I don't know enough about how TIF districts work and I don't get to vote on it anyway so I'm not going to bother researching it.
My question would be, what happens if the village doesn't go forward, and we don't get all the new units being built to expand the tax base? Who pays for the bond? Because if it's the taxpayers who are still there, and there's no way to offload the debt somehow, it feels like a bad deal with the town taxpayers taking on a lot of risk. I don't get a vote, but they can still decide to take my money (which kind of seems unfair).
My question would be, what happens if the village doesn't go forward, and we don't get all the new units being built to expand the tax base? Who pays for the bond? Because if it's the taxpayers who are still there, and there's no way to offload the debt somehow, it feels like a bad deal with the town taxpayers taking on a lot of risk. I don't get a vote, but they can still decide to take my money (which kind of seems unfair).
-
- Postaholic
- Posts: 2611
- Joined: Nov 12th, '10, 08:45
- Location: Dillsburg, PA
Re: Six Peaks Killington
to answer your question Bubba has a good summary in bullet 2 a few posts up. basically the developer would have to escrow the amount of the bonds so that the town wouldn't get screwed. How that all shakes out if said developer goes bankrupt, I have no idea...
2024-2025
Ski Visits in PA 51
Ski Visits in MD 1
Ski Visits in VT 7
Ski Visits in CO 3
Total Ski Visits 62
Ski Visits in PA 51
Ski Visits in MD 1
Ski Visits in VT 7
Ski Visits in CO 3
Total Ski Visits 62
-
- Postinator
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Feb 23rd, '06, 17:17
- Location: Where the host of Dancing with the stars lives.
Re: Six Peaks Killington
Taxation without representation. Property taxpayers should be allowed to vote on items that spend their money paid in property taxes.easyrider16 wrote: ↑Jul 7th, '22, 05:54 Just to be clear, I was quoting the headline in the story, not trying to express my opinion. I don't know enough about how TIF districts work and I don't get to vote on it anyway so I'm not going to bother researching it.
My question would be, what happens if the village doesn't go forward, and we don't get all the new units being built to expand the tax base? Who pays for the bond? Because if it's the taxpayers who are still there, and there's no way to offload the debt somehow, it feels like a bad deal with the town taxpayers taking on a lot of risk. I don't get a vote, but they can still decide to take my money (which kind of seems unfair).
2 hours and 10-minute drive to K
2024/2025 Ski Days: 35 days for the season
Killington: 11/14 (Day One), 12/23, 1/6, 1/10, 1/13,1/23, 2/5, 2/10, 2/19, 2/28, 3/11, 3/27, 4/20
Loon: 12/13, 12/20, 12/25, 1/8, 1/13, 1/15, 1/21, 1/27, 2/4, 2/12, 2/24, 3/13, 3/19, 4/11
Sunday River:3/4
Sugarloaf:
Cannon:12/05, 1/17, 1/24, 1/31, 2/21, 2/26, 3/14, 3/25
2024/2025 Ski Days: 35 days for the season
Killington: 11/14 (Day One), 12/23, 1/6, 1/10, 1/13,1/23, 2/5, 2/10, 2/19, 2/28, 3/11, 3/27, 4/20
Loon: 12/13, 12/20, 12/25, 1/8, 1/13, 1/15, 1/21, 1/27, 2/4, 2/12, 2/24, 3/13, 3/19, 4/11
Sunday River:3/4
Sugarloaf:
Cannon:12/05, 1/17, 1/24, 1/31, 2/21, 2/26, 3/14, 3/25
-
- Post Office
- Posts: 4722
- Joined: Nov 10th, '19, 15:56
Re: Six Peaks Killington
Yeah I heard there was a war fought over that issue once...
-
- Postaholic
- Posts: 2611
- Joined: Nov 12th, '10, 08:45
- Location: Dillsburg, PA
Re: Six Peaks Killington
This is definitely something that should be allowed to be voted on by all property tax payers.
2024-2025
Ski Visits in PA 51
Ski Visits in MD 1
Ski Visits in VT 7
Ski Visits in CO 3
Total Ski Visits 62
Ski Visits in PA 51
Ski Visits in MD 1
Ski Visits in VT 7
Ski Visits in CO 3
Total Ski Visits 62
-
- Bumper
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Oct 23rd, '21, 09:27
Re: Six Peaks Killington
Correct-a-Mundo.........
-
- Postaholic
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Mar 15th, '18, 09:27
Re: Six Peaks Killington
They do get to vote - a TIF district is not implemented without a vote. That said, usually TIF districts are commercially zoned and has little impact either way on a homeowner.
-
- Postaholic
- Posts: 2611
- Joined: Nov 12th, '10, 08:45
- Location: Dillsburg, PA
Re: Six Peaks Killington
if you are a second home owner you don't get a vote. That is what I was insinuating.
2024-2025
Ski Visits in PA 51
Ski Visits in MD 1
Ski Visits in VT 7
Ski Visits in CO 3
Total Ski Visits 62
Ski Visits in PA 51
Ski Visits in MD 1
Ski Visits in VT 7
Ski Visits in CO 3
Total Ski Visits 62
-
- Post Office
- Posts: 4722
- Joined: Nov 10th, '19, 15:56
Re: Six Peaks Killington
Well that's confusing. Isn't the point of this development to create a whole bunch of extra housing units?newpylong1 wrote: ↑Jul 7th, '22, 09:36 They do get to vote - a TIF district is not implemented without a vote. That said, usually TIF districts are commercially zoned and has little impact either way on a homeowner.