K will close on 4/20/08

Communicate with fellow Zoners

Moderators: SkiDork, spanky, Bubba

Post Reply
Bubba
Site Admin
Posts: 26960
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 08:42
Location: Where the climate suits my clothes

Post by Bubba »

skiadikt wrote:
SkiDork wrote:
torcs wrote:Everybody seems to be missing the point. There is not enough revenue involved to justify staying open longer. If it were my business, I would do the same thing. We're not trying to run a f*cking charity here. You're all a bunch of whining p*ssies. If you would all step outside of your own little demented worlds for just a moment, you would realize that it is not too unreasonable to run a ski resort from November to April.

Bring on the hate you bunch of cry babies.

PS - I too wish they would stay open longer.
This has always been the voice of reason answer since back in the RSN days. And the counter since then has always been "Well Pres was able to do it"
and it wasn't only during pres' years ... for the first 7 years of asc they were able to open in oct (xcept for '01-'02) and close on or about memorial and have 200 day seasons. and i'm pretty sure that in '02-'03, their october opening was top-to-bottom. they only started to contract the season during their last 4 years when they were very bankrupt.

this is a business model/tradition that went on for 25 years. no 'lets try it for a couple of years and see if it works' ... it went on for 25 years ... so anyone who says it's unreasonable to have a 200 day season doesn't have a clue. times have changed but if it wasn't a viable business model i'm sure they would have pulled the plug long ago.
It is both a viable business model as well as the Killington brand. Two things have changed, however, that make modification of the model necessary.

1. Energy costs - it's a lot more expensive to make snow than it used to be. (Let's not forget, however, that lift ticket prices have also increased quite a bit as well.)

2. The K Double no longer exists.

The first problem is out of K's control but the second can be remedied through several different means, if K wants to spend the money. Being the accounting whizzes they are, however, they will focus on the short term ROI while ignoring the brand identity and marketing gains.
"Abandon hope all ye who enter here"

Killington Zone
You can checkout any time you like,
but you can never leave

"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function" =
F. Scott Fitzgerald

"There's nothing more frightening than ignorance in action" - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
skiingsnow
Guru Poster
Posts: 5131
Joined: Nov 20th, '06, 11:19
Location: Bridgewater, VT
Contact:

Post by skiingsnow »

skiadikt wrote: and it wasn't only during pres' years ... for the first 7 years of asc they were able to open in oct (xcept for '01-'02) and close on or about memorial and have 200 day seasons. and i'm pretty sure that in '02-'03, their october opening was top-to-bottom. they only started to contract the season during their last 4 years when they were very bankrupt.

this is a business model/tradition that went on for 25 years. no 'lets try it for a couple of years and see if it works' ... it went on for 25 years ... so anyone who says it's unreasonable to have a 200 day season doesn't have a clue. times have changed but if it wasn't a viable business model i'm sure they would have pulled the plug long ago.
So after 25 years, they had failed to biuld up a big enough reputation to bring in a hundred day ticket buyers to make the operation break even/small profit?????

What you say proves everything, they kept making the season smaller and smaller the last 4 or so seasons, because it was losing serious cash. They were going bankrupt, and instead of continueing to lose thousands of dollars staying open late, or opening early, they were slowly getting rid of it.


If after a strong 25 year reputation for providing that season length, why could they still not make it profitable?

25 YEARS. And they eventually started to slowly rid themselves of the burdon, it wasn't working.
.
Image
Finn
Postaholic
Posts: 2635
Joined: Nov 20th, '04, 14:36
Location: Wherever you can ski

Post by Finn »

go back and get a real job skiingsnow......you are off the mark
You really don't know the real K story.
skiingsnow
Guru Poster
Posts: 5131
Joined: Nov 20th, '06, 11:19
Location: Bridgewater, VT
Contact:

Post by skiingsnow »

JerseyGuy wrote:Jesus H. Christ on a popsicle stick, Skippy. Are you like this in real life? Does anyone outside of KillingtonZone ever take you seriously? You're like the one Polish guy walking around Warsaw in 1939 saying "Chill out, everyone, these Nazis are actually gonna do great things for us!"

*Snow Quality has improved. Tons of natural snow all season long, and more snowmaking in more places, and drier and higher quality. Grooming is around the same.

Look, Einstein, even YOU have to admit that Powdr doesn't have a damn thing to do with the amount of "natural snow" Killington gets. "More snowmaking in more places"? Until I see a water gallon usage statistic, I'll reserve judgement on that one. And just about everyone else on this board who's skied K-Mart this year seems to disagree with you on the overall quality of the grooming, so forgive me if I trust their collective judgement over your over-the-moon Powdr swooning.

*The quality of the kids programs has improved.

Yeah, it's amazing what happens when you jack the prices through the stratosphere. They're admitting fewer students per class? Good thing, since they seem to have chased away enough kids to cancel out the need for those old-fashioned bigger classes. Talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Say, you know what? I'll bet if Kia started making their cars twice as good and made the price twice as high, a hell of a lot fewer people would buy THEM, either! But that would be OK, according to you, if Kia simply stated that their goal was to sell half as many cars, right?

*K has more lifts then anyone else in the east. Tue/Wed they have had the same amount of lifts or more then Mount Snow and Okemo, and every other mountain in Vermont. Any other day they have dramatically more lifts then any where else. Including a couple gondolas, and more high speed lifts then anywhere else in Vermont.

Who the f*** cares? Jesus, Skippy... Killington has twice the acreage of those resorts with less REAL vertical than almost any of them. The place is so damned horizontally spread out, you NEED more lifts! How is this necessarily a good thing?

There are plenty of roads in my home state, but it's because we NEED them to get any damn place, not because we love driving...

*K had a great Opening day, earlier then most mountains in New England!!

Which was, of course, less than what used to occur; namely, opening BEFORE everyone else. Just give up and stop arguing this one with the members of this board, Skip. When you've been #1 for years and years, it's hard to accept a permanent descent into "also-ran" status.

*K has a variety of every kind of terrain, including more expert terrain then anywhere else.

OK... now you're starting to run off the rails here. Mr. "Quality not Quantity" is now himself starting to fall back on the old "bigger, better, more more more" criteria of years past.

*Passes are around the same, if not cheaper then most mountains in vt. Lift ticket prices are similiar of all big mountains in New England. They are not the most expensive out there...

Passes are cheaper than most mountains in Vermont? Really? Do us a favor, Skip (cause I know you will): run Killington's season pass prices up against all of the other Vermont mountains that are comparable in business to Killington. I want to see the list of Vermont mountains who are, in the aggregate, charging more for their 08-09 season passes than is Killington.

Seriously. Go do it.

*Nyberg has been out there grooming, deicing lifts, checking tickets, running lifts and so on, he cares.

He cares? About what? Whether some Joey from, yes, Jersey has his lift ticket properly displayed? Whether or not Fred the Groomer is driving his machine at the proper speed? Do you really think that any significant number of Killington skiers give two hoots as to whether or not Killington's GM is out "grooming, deicing lifts, checking tickets, and running lifts?

Who cares? I'd prefer a competent GM who sits on his ass in his office all day doing HIS ACTUAL JOB in a thoughtful, intelligent, visionary manner -- providing an actual, tangible benefit to his resort rather than another ticket-checker... making six figures!
1. Snowmaking has been of very high quality. Snowmaking on 6+ trails that havent seen it in a couple to several years. Non stop snowmaking from October to Mid Jaunuary, at every weather oppertunity. Thats at full capacity. And with the fantastically cold weather we've had all season long providing all that nattural terrain, the snowmaking system was running nearly 24/7 at full capacity for a good 11+ weeks. Then resurfacing throughout the resort on many occasions through mid Febraury. They were the only resort in Vermont making snow for numorous days! Infact, they have made snow this March as well.

2. They could have stacked 12 kids in each program, and only have an instructor or two working on any given day... No, they quadrupled
the amount of staffing needs, then if they just stacked all the kids in 1 program, rather then running 4 seperate ones.

3. So your saying number of lifts does not matter? High speed lifts/Gonodola's, who cares? I think people who dont want to hike terrain care.

4. Again, earlier then MOST other mountains in the east. Many opened a week, or several weeks later then K.

5. Theres high qaulity on a high qaunitity of trails. Its unbeatable.

6. Thats all in one sentance. "around the same, if not cheaper" Not just "cheaper". Mount Snow charges $72 weekends, Okemo $74 for weekends. Sugarloaf alternates between $69 and $72 a day all season, Sunday River alternates between $69 and $72 a day all season, Stowe is $79 Sun-Fri and $84 Sat, Stratton is $78 weekends.

Killington is $79 Saturdays, $76 Sun-Fri.

We can talk till we're blue in the face over pass prices and the value each has for what each mountain has to offer each individual. All I can say, is that K offers a very cheap Midweek pass, a very fair Blackout pass, and a full pass that is also cheaper then some other mountains, and around the same price as many others, that provide similar "stuff" !


7. It shows that instead of sitting in his office touching himself all day, hes out there doing stuff for the good of the resort. K has people to groom, run lifts, and on and on, they could pay 3 minimum wage people to get all these tasks done all the time, instead of Nyberg. It shows that he cares. I said that in response to someone else saying, "management doesn't care"...
.
Image
VermontGranola
Green Skidder
Posts: 102
Joined: Mar 10th, '08, 14:49
Location: Vermont

Post by VermontGranola »

April 21: Please move on, there is nothing to see here. Please dispurse.
Ski! Don't Walk!
skiingsnow
Guru Poster
Posts: 5131
Joined: Nov 20th, '06, 11:19
Location: Bridgewater, VT
Contact:

Post by skiingsnow »

VermontGranola wrote:April 21: Please move on, there is nothing to see here. Please dispurse.
Dispurse? Can you really say that, when talking about a group of 3 people? Please, dispurse, theres too many of you crowding around.
.
Image
lowrider81
Beginner On Rentals
Posts: 17
Joined: Mar 9th, '08, 13:15

Post by lowrider81 »

Dear lord, I thought you'd calmed down a bit skip, I even thought the lads at that new job of yours may have knocked a little sense into you.

*The quality of the kids programs has improved.

Now, define "improved".

Yes, there are less skiers per instructor, big deal, the only time instructors had groups bigger than 6/7 anyway was at busy holiday periods.

Killington are operating at 60% less instructors than last year, mainly because there is no work and the pay is one of the lowest of any mountain in the east. Killington lost a lot of good instructors from the kids side - is this improving?

What do you think happend at holiday time? they were so short of instructors that they asked basically anyone who could put a pair of skis on - is this improving?

Seasonal Kids now go into the hopefuls, as this was the only finacially sensible thing to do for the parents, this meant they had to give up certain days of THEIR holiday volunteer - is this improving?

So Skip, tell me, how has it improved? Please no BS, i know this all to be fact, I didnt guess, or hear it from someone else.
skiadikt
Level 10K poster
Posts: 11913
Joined: Nov 4th, '04, 21:43
Location: where the water tastes like wine

Post by skiadikt »

skiingsnow wrote:
skiadikt wrote: and it wasn't only during pres' years ... for the first 7 years of asc they were able to open in oct (xcept for '01-'02) and close on or about memorial and have 200 day seasons. and i'm pretty sure that in '02-'03, their october opening was top-to-bottom. they only started to contract the season during their last 4 years when they were very bankrupt.

this is a business model/tradition that went on for 25 years. no 'lets try it for a couple of years and see if it works' ... it went on for 25 years ... so anyone who says it's unreasonable to have a 200 day season doesn't have a clue. times have changed but if it wasn't a viable business model i'm sure they would have pulled the plug long ago.
So after 25 years, they had failed to biuld up a big enough reputation to bring in a hundred day ticket buyers to make the operation break even/small profit?????

What you say proves everything, they kept making the season smaller and smaller the last 4 or so seasons, because it was losing serious cash. They were going bankrupt, and instead of continueing to lose thousands of dollars staying open late, or opening early, they were slowly getting rid of it.


If after a strong 25 year reputation for providing that season length, why could they still not make it profitable?

25 YEARS. And they eventually started to slowly rid themselves of the burdon, it wasn't working.
first of all the business model was profitable for most of those years. do you think after 25 yrs they finally said "duh i don't think this is working". the fact that you even make a connection between the season length and bankruptcy just shows how deaf, dumb & blind you are. the financial problems were there long before they decided to kill late may skiing. more than anything it was probably the "all for one" pass that ultimately killed late season. as a standalone resort not beholden to the crushing asc debt, killington would have continued to be a very profitable business and gone on operating as it always had. and to be fair to asc, even with all their problems they managed to stay open as long as there was still snow on the ground. these guys are closing in 2 weeks probably with a substantial part of the mtn still skiable.
spoiled South American skiin' whore
boston_e
Wanted Poster
Posts: 3018
Joined: May 19th, '07, 21:12

Post by boston_e »

lowrider81 wrote:Dear lord, I thought you'd calmed down a bit skip, I even thought the lads at that new job of yours may have knocked a little sense into you.

*The quality of the kids programs has improved.

Now, define "improved".

Yes, there are less skiers per instructor, big deal, the only time instructors had groups bigger than 6/7 anyway was at busy holiday periods.

Killington are operating at 60% less instructors than last year, mainly because there is no work and the pay is one of the lowest of any mountain in the east. Killington lost a lot of good instructors from the kids side - is this improving?

What do you think happend at holiday time? they were so short of instructors that they asked basically anyone who could put a pair of skis on - is this improving?

Seasonal Kids now go into the hopefuls, as this was the only finacially sensible thing to do for the parents, this meant they had to give up certain days of THEIR holiday volunteer - is this improving?

So Skip, tell me, how has it improved? Please no BS, i know this all to be fact, I didnt guess, or hear it from someone else.
A couple of people I knew who actually spent the money on the kids programs tell me that they were no more or less impressed with the programs than in years past.

I didn't try them this year.... priced me out of that area.
Coydog
Guru Poster
Posts: 5966
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 12:23

Post by Coydog »

torcs wrote:Everybody seems to be missing the point. There is not enough revenue involved to justify staying open longer. If it were my business, I would do the same thing. We're not trying to run a f*cking charity here. You're all a bunch of whining p*ssies. If you would all step outside of your own little demented worlds for just a moment, you would realize that it is not too unreasonable to run a ski resort from November to April.

Bring on the hate you bunch of cry babies.

PS - I too wish they would stay open longer.
Well it appears Sugarloaf, Mt. Snow and Sugarbush will go longer than Killington this season – possibly MRG. Sugarbush even offers a special discounted ($199) Spring Pass.

To continue operations into the late season, I guess you are saying the managers of these resorts possess better business skills than those of Powdr.
JerseyGuy
Postinator
Posts: 6461
Joined: Feb 20th, '05, 12:10

Post by JerseyGuy »

skiingsnow wrote:I wuv Killington! I wuv Powdr! These guys rock! Here's why everything they do is the bestest stuff ever in the history of the world! Blah blah blah freakin' blah!
JerseyGuy wrote:Jesus, Skippy. Here's why you're wrong, in excruciating point-by-point detail.
skiingsnow wrote:I don't care! I don't care! Your logic and reason have no effect on me! I'm going to willfully ignore every single point you've attempted to make because thinking isn't my strong suit! Killington! Powdr! KillingtonPowdrKillingtonPowdr I can't HEAR you lalalalalalalalalala!
Sigh...

I had a chocolate lab once -- Cocoa (don't blame me, it was a girlfriend's idea to name him thus), and he was a great dog. Loyal, friendly, happy, always at my side (or under my feet)... and dumber than a bag of hammers. Whenever Cocoa did something INCREDIBLY lamebrained or stupid, the "conversation" between me and my dog would go something like this:

JerseyGuy: Cocoa! Dammit! Stop eating the damn stereo equipment!

Cocoa: Barkbarkbarkbark!

JerseyGuy: Cocoa! No! Cocoa! Dammit! Wait until I open the screen door before running outside!

Cocoa: Barkbarkwoofwoofslobber!

JerseyGuy: Jesus Christ, Cocoa, did you eat this entire loaf of bread off of the counter AND the jar of peanut butter? How many times do I have to tell you --

Cocoa: Barkwoofburpslobberarrroooooo!

His orchestra was definitely missing a few instruments, but you couldn't help admiring his -- if you'll pardon the pun -- dogged determination to go his own way, no matter how idiotic it was or how little sense it made to anyone else in the world. In CocoaWorld, everything that dog did was juuuuust fine.

I guess that's why all of these arguments with Skippy -- and his completely inane replies -- bring back such fond memories for me.

Skippy, I dub thee "Little Cocoa".
"Default on aug 3rd just like clown lips said."
-- Racist Maddie, finally revealing himself as the hateful racist that he really is


"The rest of your post is something my pathetic little mind can't even remotely fathom."
-- Racist Maddie: uncut, uncensored, unedited and unhinged


"when is JG gonna figure out that since i OWN HIM, there is no need to respond to him"
-- tellitlikeheiwishesitwas, stumbling into a new way to handle being publicly called out for lying: a clumsy duck and weave with a dollop of self-delusion


"blah blah Okemo is awesome blah"
-- SkippyShill, in an accidental moment of misplaced clarity


"Go f*** yourself."
-- StreetSkippy, who be hatin' on tha haters
icedtea
Guru Poster
Posts: 5446
Joined: Feb 20th, '07, 13:01
Location: da shady maple

Post by icedtea »

yeah skippy is a little naive...borderline cheerleader


but at least he contributes positive energy to the board. give the kid a break, we all should be happy that we got to ski/ ride killington or any other place as much as we did this year.

i love snowboarding...i am obsessed with snowboarding and i am one lucky sob that i get to do it as much as i do.

sh*t...some people worry about what they will feed their kids for dinner..let the kid be happy and positive and maybe we should be more happy and positive as well.

don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty!
"To have the truth in your possession you can be found guilty, sentenced to death."
Peter Tosh
skiingsnow
Guru Poster
Posts: 5131
Joined: Nov 20th, '06, 11:19
Location: Bridgewater, VT
Contact:

Post by skiingsnow »

skiadikt wrote:
skiingsnow wrote:
skiadikt wrote: and it wasn't only during pres' years ... for the first 7 years of asc they were able to open in oct (xcept for '01-'02) and close on or about memorial and have 200 day seasons. and i'm pretty sure that in '02-'03, their october opening was top-to-bottom. they only started to contract the season during their last 4 years when they were very bankrupt.

this is a business model/tradition that went on for 25 years. no 'lets try it for a couple of years and see if it works' ... it went on for 25 years ... so anyone who says it's unreasonable to have a 200 day season doesn't have a clue. times have changed but if it wasn't a viable business model i'm sure they would have pulled the plug long ago.
So after 25 years, they had failed to biuld up a big enough reputation to bring in a hundred day ticket buyers to make the operation break even/small profit?????

What you say proves everything, they kept making the season smaller and smaller the last 4 or so seasons, because it was losing serious cash. They were going bankrupt, and instead of continueing to lose thousands of dollars staying open late, or opening early, they were slowly getting rid of it.


If after a strong 25 year reputation for providing that season length, why could they still not make it profitable?

25 YEARS. And they eventually started to slowly rid themselves of the burdon, it wasn't working.
first of all the business model was profitable for most of those years. do you think after 25 yrs they finally said "duh i don't think this is working". the fact that you even make a connection between the season length and bankruptcy just shows how deaf, dumb & blind you are. the financial problems were there long before they decided to kill late may skiing. more than anything it was probably the "all for one" pass that ultimately killed late season. as a standalone resort not beholden to the crushing asc debt, killington would have continued to be a very profitable business and gone on operating as it always had. and to be fair to asc, even with all their problems they managed to stay open as long as there was still snow on the ground. these guys are closing in 2 weeks probably with a substantial part of the mtn still skiable.
Again, making an overall profit from the season, doesn't make the early and late skiing profitable. You can make $15 M Nov10 - April10, and then lose $1 M early Oct opening to Mid November, and from Mid April through closing in mid/late May or even early/mid June.

They got in a habit of doing it. And as we know, they were shortening it bit by bit over many years, and finally there last few years, they went into rapid season shortening mode.... If it made money, or at least broke even, they woulda kept up with it, it gave them all that good free advertising, and hell, didn't cost any money!!!

Stay open as long as snow on the ground? uhhhh, you mean in asc earlier years, not the last several years. . .

"the fact that you even make a connection between the season length and bankruptcy just shows how deaf, dumb & blind you are."

They were shortening the season more and more, because it wasn't making money, hence, they were slowly ridding themselves of the burdon of staying open later and later, and opening sooner and sooner, because they were losing their shirts doing it.

Within a year and a half of ownership, Powdr will have already dumped over $15 M into Killington. Powdr eats what they killed. Their business model is working!!!
.
Image
chfriend
Beginner On Rentals
Posts: 33
Joined: Sep 15th, '07, 05:45
Location: The flatlands of MA

Post by chfriend »

skiingsnow wrote:Again, making an overall profit from the season, doesn't make the early and late skiing profitable. You can make $15 M Nov10 - April10, and then lose $1 M early Oct opening to Mid November, and from Mid April through closing in mid/late May or even early/mid June.
...kersnippity

You really are a moron aren't you? You just don't get it, and apparently never will.
skiingsnow
Guru Poster
Posts: 5131
Joined: Nov 20th, '06, 11:19
Location: Bridgewater, VT
Contact:

Post by skiingsnow »

chfriend wrote:
skiingsnow wrote:Again, making an overall profit from the season, doesn't make the early and late skiing profitable. You can make $15 M Nov10 - April10, and then lose $1 M early Oct opening to Mid November, and from Mid April through closing in mid/late May or even early/mid June.
...kersnippity

You really are a moron aren't you? You just don't get it, and apparently never will.
I am a moron. So please do explain something to me. If we are trying to biuld the interconnect, replace old lifts, realign existing lifts, move under utilized lifts to where they can be utilized, open up more terrain, and buy better snowmaking equipement, and better grooming equipement, all the while maintaining all existing facilities, and making upgrades to some facilities, and replacing others alltogether,

Why should K take actions that will lose thousands upon thousands of dollars, with the above plan?



I want a longer season!! Dont know how many times I have to say that, I am not against a long season! I am for it! But not at the cost of delaying or cancelling any of the above projects.
.
Image
Post Reply