So you're just going to ignore Heller? What do you think "Keep and bear" means? Keep 4 towns away in an armory? Can you both keep and bear if you are not in possession?easyrider16 wrote: ↑Jun 23rd, '22, 13:10
The issue I take with that view we discussed earlier - I don't think the 2nd amendment should be applied to the states, and I don't think it was meant to guarantee a personal right as it was written.
You either agree that this is a federation of independent States, bound under the constitution, or you don't. Some folks playing favorites doesn't invalidate that foundational structure.easyrider16 wrote: ↑Jun 23rd, '22, 13:10As far as the federalism argument, that always seems like a pretext to me. The only time a person seems to care about "state's rights" is when it gets them the outcome they want. But somehow that principle gets discarded whenever it doesn't favor the desired outcome.
A good example is health care. We should have 50 versions of health care legislation, and each state can find their own best mix. Some will do better than others, but this allows for better experimentation, evolution and adaption, as opposed to a Federal mandate full of bureaucratic bungling on a national scale. This might even be seen as a possible future decision should Roe V Wade get struck down. If abortion is the province of the states, why isn't all health care?