skiingsnow wrote:Exactly! So no one should of had the expectation that they were going to be there! Thats what I was trying to say. . . These people have lives too, and because they didn't take hours out of their lives, to spend listening to people in the middle of the night, doesn't mean they dont care, or were avoiding anything, maybe they were avoiding it, but no one should have thought they were obligated to be there, unless they had said they would be there, at the last meeting, or the board told people before yesterdays meeting that Chris and Steve had specifically told the board they would be there.BadDog wrote:Uh, no. Meeting agendas, including inivtaions, are not necessarily "set" at a previous meeting.skiingsnow wrote:That being said, who said that they were going to be there? The board told you they had invited them, once you had gotten to the meeting? And they told you that they were coming? An then they didn't? If any of these then they had no obligation to be there. If people were told the previous meeting that they would definetly be there, and then they didn't show, then that would be skipping the meeting.
Huh? Could you try that again in English?
What's with you? You can't possibly defend EVERYTHING these guys do or don't do, can you?