
Pico on the other hand is another story - how CAN it make money?
Does ASC release data on the financial performance of its ski areas?

Moderators: SkiDork, spanky, Bubba
No, not on an individual basis.Pushgears wrote: Does ASC release data on the financial performance of its ski areas?
It's a good thing you didn't wrap up your finance class. In that case, we'd have to take issue with your professor.IceDevil wrote:Since I just wrapped up my marketing class I can tell you that Killiington is not a cash cow. K would need to to the Eastern skiing industry what Tide is to Laundry detergent.
It seems like K is simply a tool ASC is using to deal with competition. A very good product but unfortunately the money invested is simply to combat competition.
how do you know K is a cow if ASC financials are consolidated? i've always thought they were, but i'm not so sure now, especially after this sh*t snow year. i know my rental income is WAY down from the prior yearsKingsFourMan wrote:Even in the hands of pathetic ASC, k-mart is definitely a cash cow, no question about it, though ASC has steadily driven it into the ground since taking over. years of poor snowmaking/grooming, deferred maintenance, and other cost cutting measures by ASC like closing old Sunrise Mt, and operating fewer lifts, have resulted in a steady and steep decline in skier visits since.
K is still #1 in the east in "skier visits" but Okemo is a close #2 in will likely pass K very soon. Okemo is run like a swiss watch, and because of it, skier visits have soared, and real estate values there are at least 25% higher than they are at K. If Okemo can become the #1 resort in the east with that lame ass mountain, imagine what K could be in the hands of someone like the Muellers, Intrawest, Vail Assoc., etc.
i can't wait for the day when ASC finally shits themselves to death.
Well put, I think I agree 100% with that. I still can't believe they closed Sunrise. The idea about attending the lifts, paying ski patrol and cafeteria is lame in my mountain. Sometimes you have to operate some things at a loss for the greater good. What about putting a new lift in Ram's head that doesn't even go to the top. "Beginners coildn't handle the upper Mt. steeps" - Lame.Even in the hands of pathetic ASC, k-mart is definitely a cash cow, no question about it, though ASC has steadily driven it into the ground since taking over. years of poor snowmaking/grooming, deferred maintenance, and other cost cutting measures by ASC like closing old Sunrise Mt, and operating fewer lifts, have resulted in a steady and steep decline in skier visits since.
K is still #1 in the east in "skier visits" but Okemo is a close #2 in will likely pass K very soon. Okemo is run like a swiss watch, and because of it, skier visits have soared, and real estate values there are at least 25% higher than they are at K. If Okemo can become the #1 resort in the east with that lame ass mountain, imagine what K could be in the hands of someone like the Muellers, Intrawest, Vail Assoc., etc.
i can't wait for the day when ASC finally shits themselves to death.
I believe you are incorrect. Killington is the driving force behind ASC.IceDevil wrote:Since I just wrapped up my marketing class I can tell you that Killiington is not a cash cow. K would need to to the Eastern skiing industry what Tide is to Laundry detergent.
It seems like K is simply a tool ASC is using to deal with competition. A very good product but unfortunately the money invested is simply to combat competition.
From what I was told (could be wrong, of course) the reason they didn't go to the top with the Skyeship had to do with the peak restaurant not being able to handle it structurallynewpylong wrote:Not putting the skyeship into the top - I know the winds between Skye and K peak are big, but doesn't the upper and lower sections operate independently anyway??? Perhaps they knew in advance that they would be putting the K1 in... but still..
??? The peak restaurant is the old gondola terminal. Seems odd that it wouldn't be structurally capable.SkiDork wrote:From what I was told (could be wrong, of course) the reason they didn't go to the top with the Skyeship had to do with the peak restaurant not being able to handle it structurallynewpylong wrote:Not putting the skyeship into the top - I know the winds between Skye and K peak are big, but doesn't the upper and lower sections operate independently anyway??? Perhaps they knew in advance that they would be putting the K1 in... but still..