Killington Skier Visits?

Communicate with fellow Zoners

Moderators: SkiDork, spanky, Bubba

Geoff
Whipping Post
Posts: 9338
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 10:34
Location: Massholia

Post by Geoff »

Coydog wrote:
Geoff wrote: How many people do you run into who, when Killington comes up, say, "I haven't been there in years other than for October and May skiing. That place is a zoo." People who ski farther north in Vermont are pretty much united in that opinion. Much of the Boston market says the same thing and now goes to Sunday River. I'll bet a lot of the Connecticut market that now goes to Okemo says it.
That was one perception for some weekend skiers. "Kmart, no one skis there anymore because it’s too crowded."

However before ASC, Killington had skier visits in the 1 million range per season during the 80’s and they seemed to manage the mountain very effectively back then. It can be done.

And I disagree with the characterization that many or most pass holders don't care about early and late season skiing. I believe that was part of the great appeal of K. They might not all actually ski then, but it was part of the perceived advantage of purchasing a pass.

Kill the extended season and you kill pass revenue. I guess next season's pass sales will prove me right or wrong - we'll see.
I was there in the 1980's. I remember the 45 minute lift line at the K chair. I remember sitting on hay bails in the bar because they weren't allowed enough chairs for the square footage to seat all the people. We all skied Bear because that was the only part of the mountain with any kind of uphill capacity. The skiing surface in the Killington basin was really nice because they had really lousy uphill capacity. Killington of those years was doing 600K skier visits, not a million. It wasn't until the mid-1990's when they added the Skyeship, Superstar Quad, Canyon Quad, and flipped the Snowdon double into a quad that they could actually handle the big skier visits and got up to their claimed million skier visits as Preston Smith was preparing to unload Ski Ltd on Les Otten. Even then, the lift lines were huge and Killington was a total zoo on Saturdays.

Once again, I agree about the perceived value of a Killington season pass when it offers Halloween until June 1 skiing. When I was picking a mountain in the early 1980's, that was by far the dominant factor in picking Killington over other options. I'd had season passes at Stowe and midweek passes at Mad River so I knew there were other options that had a moderately longer drive time from the metro-Boston area. I think Killington is making a mistake by shortening the season. Only time will tell if they're right or we're right.

And to repeat myself, Preston Smith didn't discount anything in the 1980's. Killington was always a tough place to get a comp ticket. Ski shop employees couldn't get comps. You had to be a shop owner or shop manager. In the days before the internet, it was really difficult to find out about ski club voucher deals. Killington didn't sell many of those vouchers. That only exploded over the last decade as the information got out. If you were a flatland weekender, your choices were a season pass that broke even at 20 days or a full boat day ticket. Welcome back to the 1980's Killington pricing structure.
Image
SkiDork
Site Admin
Posts: 18288
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 01:02
Location: LI, NY / Killington, VT

Post by SkiDork »

Geoff wrote:I was there in the 1980's. I remember the 45 minute lift line at the K chair. I remember sitting on hay bails in the bar because they weren't allowed enough chairs for the square footage to seat all the people. We all skied Bear because that was the only part of the mountain with any kind of uphill capacity. The skiing surface in the Killington basin was really nice because they had really lousy uphill capacity. Killington of those years was doing 600K skier visits, not a million. It wasn't until the mid-1990's when they added the Skyeship, Superstar Quad, Canyon Quad, and flipped the Snowdon double into a quad that they could actually handle the big skier visits and got up to their claimed million skier visits as Preston Smith was preparing to unload Ski Ltd on Les Otten. Even then, the lift lines were huge and Killington was a total zoo on Saturdays.
How most of us long for those days though, regardless if we were there or not.... Why? Well for one thing, they didn't mow all the good bump runs...
Wait Till Next Year!!! Image

Iceman 10/11 Season

ImageImageImage
Geoff
Whipping Post
Posts: 9338
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 10:34
Location: Massholia

Post by Geoff »

Coydog wrote:Out of curiosity, other than the reduction in crowding and the newly painted lift towers, what did Powdr offer that increased your satisfaction over past seasons?
I don't care about painted lift towers. I happily ride the Southridge triple. When I go on vacations, I tend to pick resorts with old infrastructure since they have the best skiing surface.

To me, the reduction of the weekend mayhem was a huge improvement over the ASC discount mess.

I thought the quality control on the snowmaking was improved. ASC gave us a lot of death slides down snowmaking whales. It's still not perfect but it's better.

The short season sucks and I'm pissed about it. The other things they did were mildly annoying. Skiadkt captured some of them earlier in this thread. Everybody second guesses grooming and that's been going on at every ski resort for the last 50 years. There's no point in going there.

For me, the shortened season has me thinking about my options. I own property so it's a pain in the ass to move. If they did something incredibly stupid like chainsaw the tree skiing on Snowdon and install snowmaking on the natural snow trails, that would probably accellerate my decision process.
Image
User avatar
Stormchaser
Level 10K poster
Posts: 14087
Joined: Nov 4th, '04, 22:32
Location: Hot tub

Post by Stormchaser »

Geoff wrote:
Coydog wrote:Out of curiosity, other than the reduction in crowding and the newly painted lift towers, what did Powdr offer that increased your satisfaction over past seasons?
I don't care about painted lift towers. I happily ride the Southridge triple. When I go on vacations, I tend to pick resorts with old infrastructure since they have the best skiing surface.

To me, the reduction of the weekend mayhem was a huge improvement over the ASC discount mess.

I thought the quality control on the snowmaking was improved. ASC gave us a lot of death slides down snowmaking whales. It's still not perfect but it's better.

The short season sucks and I'm pissed about it. The other things they did were mildly annoying. Skiadkt captured some of them earlier in this thread. Everybody second guesses grooming and that's been going on at every ski resort for the last 50 years. There's no point in going there.

For me, the shortened season has me thinking about my options. I own property so it's a pain in the ass to move. If they did something incredibly stupid like chainsaw the tree skiing on Snowdon and install snowmaking on the natural snow trails, that would probably accellerate my decision process.
I'll forward this along to Skip so he can have Powdr get right on it.
ImageImageImageImage
Geoff
Whipping Post
Posts: 9338
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 10:34
Location: Massholia

Post by Geoff »

SkiDork wrote:
Geoff wrote:I was there in the 1980's. I remember the 45 minute lift line at the K chair. I remember sitting on hay bails in the bar because they weren't allowed enough chairs for the square footage to seat all the people. We all skied Bear because that was the only part of the mountain with any kind of uphill capacity. The skiing surface in the Killington basin was really nice because they had really lousy uphill capacity. Killington of those years was doing 600K skier visits, not a million. It wasn't until the mid-1990's when they added the Skyeship, Superstar Quad, Canyon Quad, and flipped the Snowdon double into a quad that they could actually handle the big skier visits and got up to their claimed million skier visits as Preston Smith was preparing to unload Ski Ltd on Les Otten. Even then, the lift lines were huge and Killington was a total zoo on Saturdays.
How most of us long for those days though, regardless if we were there or not.... Why? Well for one thing, they didn't mow all the good bump runs...
Of course they mowed the bump runs. OL has been 50% groomed most of the time for my 25+ years at Killington. The only difference is that they used to blow it edge to edge. People only remember the days when the bump runs were in good shape. Everyone forgets about when they were unskiable and Killington put the winch cats on them. Bear was the center of the universe then because it was the only part of the mountain with uphill capacity. With the Superstar quad, K1, and Canyon Quad, it moved back to KBL.

I long for those days because I was in my early 20's and I was invincible. I could close the bars and still smoke a joint in the parking lot while booting up and make first chair. I was in shape. I got laid every weekend. They were very good years.
Image
SkiDork
Site Admin
Posts: 18288
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 01:02
Location: LI, NY / Killington, VT

Post by SkiDork »

I stand corrected....
Wait Till Next Year!!! Image

Iceman 10/11 Season

ImageImageImage
Coydog
Guru Poster
Posts: 5966
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 12:23

Post by Coydog »

Geoff wrote:Killington of those years was doing 600K skier visits, not a million. It wasn't until the mid-1990's when they added the Skyeship, Superstar Quad, Canyon Quad, and flipped the Snowdon double into a quad that they could actually handle the big skier visits and got up to their claimed million skier visits as Preston Smith was preparing to unload Ski Ltd on Les Otten.

Code: Select all

S-K-I Visits in Millions

82/3 83/4 84/5 85/6 86/7

0.96 1.29 1.33 1.44 1.61
From Lorentz - this includes Killington and Mt. Snow (but not Pico). Mt. Snow skier visits ranged from 140,000 in 1977 (when S-K-I acquired them) to 543,308 in 1988.
Geoff wrote:
And to repeat myself, Preston Smith didn't discount anything in the 1980's.

Welcome back to the 1980's Killington pricing structure.
1980's pricing is fine if you are paying for a 1980's season length.
Geoff
Whipping Post
Posts: 9338
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 10:34
Location: Massholia

Post by Geoff »

Coydog wrote:
Geoff wrote:Killington of those years was doing 600K skier visits, not a million. It wasn't until the mid-1990's when they added the Skyeship, Superstar Quad, Canyon Quad, and flipped the Snowdon double into a quad that they could actually handle the big skier visits and got up to their claimed million skier visits as Preston Smith was preparing to unload Ski Ltd on Les Otten.

Code: Select all

S-K-I Visits in Millions

82/3 83/4 84/5 85/6 86/7

0.96 1.29 1.33 1.44 1.61
From Lorentz - this includes Killington and Mt. Snow (but not Pico). Mt. Snow skier visits ranged from 140,000 in 1977 (when S-K-I acquired them) to 543,308 in 1988.
Geoff wrote:
And to repeat myself, Preston Smith didn't discount anything in the 1980's.

Welcome back to the 1980's Killington pricing structure.
1980's pricing is fine if you are paying for a 1980's season length.
Just because you read something in a book doesn't mean it's true.

This is a very old rehash of it but it's pretty well accepted that Preston Smith inflated the hell out of his skier visit numbers to jack up the stock price of SKI. That was before they changed the SEC reporting laws so you'd get tossed in jail for doing that. I think we can all agree that they did far more skier visits than Killington does now. It's unclear if Killington ever saw a million skier visits. Just another superlative like the inflated trail count. It worked. Nobody knows if the POWDR way of doing things will work. Most of us have our doubts.

We all agree on season length.
Image
TwinsWillSki
Beginner On Rentals
Posts: 44
Joined: Nov 13th, '04, 16:57
Location: W. Newbury, MA

Post by TwinsWillSki »

As a former K. customer who jumped ship to SR this winter, I would like to make the following observations.

Boyne joined the eastern ski market this year, at the same time and similar fashion as POWDR. They both operate the mountain, but do not benefit from off-mountain activities. However, they appear to have taken much different approaches to the market.

Boyne like POWDR raised pass prices above ASC levels, though not as much. However, they did not change the product, except maybe more grooming. In fact, though not over, Boyne offered the longest ski season in the east. SR opened for one day on Oct. 30th, and then for good (top to bottom) on Nov. 10th, and stayed open through last Sun (April 27th). They even offered free skiing on the last day. That clearly wasn't a money maker, but it was a gesture of goodwill that is "tradition" at the SR. In fact, the season isn't over, as we can ski through next Sun. (May 4th) at the "Loaf". All this despite receiving only 211" of snow at SR this winter. Did Boyne lose money by staying open until May?

Another perk for the more expensive passes, were discounts at their western resorts, including Big Sky. (Though not widely used, I know a few people who took them up on their offer. Did K pass holders receive any discounts at Park City?) The general feeling around SR this winter was that the new owners appreciated our business.

SR also offered season-long kid's program, at a reasonable cost, for 4 and 5 year olds. (Run by friends of Mrs. G.) K doesn't offer a program for 4-yr olds; and 5 yr olds is only on Sat, and parents are "required to volunteer" 10-days to help out. I guess POWDR doesn't care about young families.

Without implementing the cost cutting measures that POWDR implemented, Boyne will also be installing a new $7.2 milllion lift this summer, and making other on-mountain improvements. So, closing early was not a prerequisite for installing a new lift.

I know it is still early in the change in ownership of the two ski areas, but clearly their are differnet management styles of the two ownership groups. Time will tell on who succeeds and who doesn't. But at first glance, both management groups have claimed successful first years, but Boyne has not "pissed off" a core group, the way POWDR clearly has.

Fortunately, we had the opportunity to choose between ME and VT. I realize that Maine is too far for the NY/NJ/CT crowd, but for those of us who live in the Boston area, we have a choice. At some point, we may move back to VT, but when we do, we will be skiing at Sugarbush.
skiingsnow
Guru Poster
Posts: 5131
Joined: Nov 20th, '06, 11:19
Location: Bridgewater, VT
Contact:

Post by skiingsnow »

Mister Moose wrote:Skiingsnow -
I can't take the scrolling anymore. This thread just put me over the edge. At 353 pixels wide, your avitar takes up a full third of the screen. Maybe your screen resolution is set differently on a 22" monitor, but over here I have to scroll every thread you post in, and lately that's every thread. Since the admins don't seem to care, reduce your avitar or go on ignore, as much as it pains me to do so.

Here's how you do it. Put the photo in your gallery. Find the page with the thumbnail of your avitar. Right click on the thumbnail. Go to properties. Copy and paste the URL presented there in your profile.
My avatar is only 240 wide. Try refreshing the page. Shortskis is 240 wide, and thats what he told me was ok.

Its been 240 for a couple days now, refresh and it should be fixed...


If not, give me a pm, and I'll make it even smaller, or make the sig pics smaller if needed...
.
Image
User avatar
Mister Moose
Level 10K poster
Posts: 11903
Joined: Jan 4th, '05, 18:23
Location: Waiting for the next one

Post by Mister Moose »

skiingsnow wrote:
My avatar is only 240 wide. Try refreshing the page. Shortskis is 240 wide, and thats what he told me was ok.

Its been 240 for a couple days now, refresh and it should be fixed...

If not, give me a pm, and I'll make it even smaller, or make the sig pics smaller if needed...
http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/hh29 ... -08018.jpg

Size 29822 bytes
Dimension: 353 x 249

I think 240 is too big....

Refresh??? you think I stare at one page all day?
Image
madvillain
Bumper
Posts: 536
Joined: Jan 5th, '08, 13:05
Location: The middle of nowhere - VT Tech; Randolph Center, VT

Post by madvillain »

skiingsnow wrote:
Mister Moose wrote:Skiingsnow -
I can't take the scrolling anymore. This thread just put me over the edge. At 353 pixels wide, your avitar takes up a full third of the screen. Maybe your screen resolution is set differently on a 22" monitor, but over here I have to scroll every thread you post in, and lately that's every thread. Since the admins don't seem to care, reduce your avitar or go on ignore, as much as it pains me to do so.

Here's how you do it. Put the photo in your gallery. Find the page with the thumbnail of your avitar. Right click on the thumbnail. Go to properties. Copy and paste the URL presented there in your profile.
My avatar is only 240 wide. Try refreshing the page. Shortskis is 240 wide, and thats what he told me was ok.

Its been 240 for a couple days now, refresh and it should be fixed...


If not, give me a pm, and I'll make it even smaller, or make the sig pics smaller if needed...
mine is 280...no one's ever bitched about it :roll:
"The sun is bright and the powder bitchin'!"
-Unknown Dude
:
::
:::
Image
Coydog
Guru Poster
Posts: 5966
Joined: Nov 5th, '04, 12:23

Post by Coydog »

Geoff wrote: This is a very old rehash of it but it's pretty well accepted that Preston Smith inflated the hell out of his skier visit numbers to jack up the stock price of SKI.
Ok, those are the numbers S-K-I Ltd published as a public company. However, I wouldn’t be surprised if they were inflated to some degree.

Maybe Powdr can create a viable, long term business with the Bear Creek low volume, high yield, mid-winter only customer, but I don’t see how you sustain a town and get a village built under that model. And the village is where the "diamond in the rough" opportunity lies.

In my opinion, Killington has had better and Killington deserves better.
BrockVond
Powderhound
Posts: 1559
Joined: Jan 3rd, '05, 14:27

Post by BrockVond »

JerseyGuy wrote:

Jesus, Skippy... let me be blunt: shut the hell up.)
Yeah, listen to the P-oke-bitch dictate. 9 posts today, JerseyFag. How about you shut the hell up, or get a job, or both.

(Now she'll spend four posts replying. Cripes!)
JerseyGuy
Postinator
Posts: 6461
Joined: Feb 20th, '05, 12:10

Post by JerseyGuy »

BrockVond wrote:
JerseyGuy wrote:

Jesus, Skippy... let me be blunt: shut the hell up.)
Yeah, listen to the P-oke-bitch dictate. 9 posts today, JerseyFag. How about you shut the hell up, or get a job, or both.

(Now she'll spend four posts replying. Cripes!)
Hey, everyone... look what imaginary persona just came crawling back on his virtual knees: BrockVond!

Say, Brock, weren't you relevant here, once? Or mildly interesting?

No? Not really? Sorry. My mistake.

Now go crawl back into your hole, or whichever alternate alias you're attempting to draw fire away from, for a few more weeks. We'll miss your sparkling wit and your overreliance on the word "fag".
"Default on aug 3rd just like clown lips said."
-- Racist Maddie, finally revealing himself as the hateful racist that he really is


"The rest of your post is something my pathetic little mind can't even remotely fathom."
-- Racist Maddie: uncut, uncensored, unedited and unhinged


"when is JG gonna figure out that since i OWN HIM, there is no need to respond to him"
-- tellitlikeheiwishesitwas, stumbling into a new way to handle being publicly called out for lying: a clumsy duck and weave with a dollop of self-delusion


"blah blah Okemo is awesome blah"
-- SkippyShill, in an accidental moment of misplaced clarity


"Go f*** yourself."
-- StreetSkippy, who be hatin' on tha haters
Post Reply