Sorry, but I've never bought anyone's self-reported snow totals. Pure marketing BS...
"Default on aug 3rd just like clown lips said." -- Racist Maddie, finally revealing himself as the hateful racist that he really is
"The rest of your post is something my pathetic little mind can't even remotely fathom." -- Racist Maddie: uncut, uncensored, unedited and unhinged
"when is JG gonna figure out that since i OWN HIM, there is no need to respond to him" -- tellitlikeheiwishesitwas, stumbling into a new way to handle being publicly called out for lying: a clumsy duck and weave with a dollop of self-delusion
"blah blah Okemo is awesome blah" -- SkippyShill, in an accidental moment of misplaced clarity
"Go f*** yourself." -- StreetSkippy, who be hatin' on tha haters
And yet, what does that get you? I haven't been overly impressed with the natural conditions. The reality is that 211 inches is most likely BS to begin with, but even if it were accurate what has it gotten us? I mean is an 18 inch storm total really 18 inches when it r*ins out in the middle or towards the end and either washes it away or make it cement? Look at Sugarloaf for instance they have 80 inch base depths in areas (yes I know snowmaking), but they have maybe recieved 150 inches so far......most likely closer to 125........not sure though.
JerseyGuy wrote:Sorry, but I've never bought anyone's self-reported snow totals. Pure marketing BS...
Actually, they've consistantly under reported snowfall this year.....12" reported usually means 1-1/2 ft+ in most places on the hill.
That said, we have had alot of r*in wiping out base. But it is deep out there right now, lots of stuff is covered.
"I'M YELLING BECAUSE YOU DID SOMETHING COOL!" - Humpty Dumpty
"Kzone should bill you for the bandwidth you waste writing novels to try and prove a point, but end up just looking like a deranged narcissistic fool." - Deadheadskier at madhatter
"The key is to not be lame, and know it, and not give a rat's @$$ what anybody thinks......that's real cool." - Highway Star http://goo.gl/xJxo34" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"I am one of the coolest people on the internet..." - Highway Star
"I have a tiny penis...." - C-Rex
XtremeJibber2001 - THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA HAS YOU COMPLETELY HYPNOTIZED. PLEASE WAKE UP AND LEARN HOW TO FILTER REALITY FROM BS NARRATIVES.
"Your life is only interesting when you capture the best, fakest, most curated split second version." - Team Robot regarding Instagram posters
I have no issues with what they report for totals. Been pretty accurate. It will have to be one sucktacular 2nd half for me to win the snowfall contest. I hope I lose big!
Gutts wrote:And yet, what does that get you? I haven't been overly impressed with the natural conditions. The reality is that 211 inches is most likely BS to begin with, but even if it were accurate what has it gotten us? I mean is an 18 inch storm total really 18 inches when it r*ins out in the middle or towards the end and either washes it away or make it cement? Look at Sugarloaf for instance they have 80 inch base depths in areas (yes I know snowmaking), but they have maybe recieved 150 inches so far......most likely closer to 125........not sure though.
ur missin the point of the thread. 211" has been pretty accurate too, just so u know. its gotten us a pretty solid base and its only the start of february. the mountain is 100% open. an 18" storm is 18". although we lost a ton of snow around xmas, i certainly will never forget those 4 days before that. that snow was lighter than the 40"+ that i just skied in utah. btw, ur glass is half empty. get a new one.
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man."